Testing the Safe-Haven Properties of Green Bonds, Gold, and Bitcoin for Traditional Bonds: A Wavelet Quantile Correlation Approach

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Australian Economic Papers Pub Date : 2026-03-02 Epub Date: 2025-09-14 DOI:10.1111/1467-8454.70007
Chi-Wei Su, Yu-Mei Ding, Kai-Hua Wang, Xiao-Qing Wang
{"title":"Testing the Safe-Haven Properties of Green Bonds, Gold, and Bitcoin for Traditional Bonds: A Wavelet Quantile Correlation Approach","authors":"Chi-Wei Su,&nbsp;Yu-Mei Ding,&nbsp;Kai-Hua Wang,&nbsp;Xiao-Qing Wang","doi":"10.1111/1467-8454.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this paper, the safe-haven attributes of green bonds, gold, and bitcoin are compared to those of traditional bonds under various time periods and quantiles by using the WQC methodology. The results indicate that green bonds exhibited a stable safe-haven function at longer time horizons during the full sample period, whereas other assets did not have safe-haven features. During the COVID-19 pandemic, bitcoin exhibited safe-haven attributes at all time horizons, whereas gold demonstrated these characteristics over the short and medium terms. In the sample period during the Russia–Ukraine war, green bonds had strong safe-haven properties at shorter and middle time horizons, whereas bitcoin had these properties at longer time spans. In this paper, a multivariate network framework that includes green bonds, gold, and bitcoin is constructed, and the theoretical foundations that influence the safe-haven attributes of assets are detailed. In addition, this study clearly presents the safe-haven effects of assets under various sample periods, time horizons, and quantiles, thereby bridging the gap of existing studies that ignore time frequency. Thus, this paper provides advice for investors, regulators, and policy-makers, such as choosing portfolios on the basis of asset characteristics, monitoring asset disclosure, and encouraging the trading of safe-haven assets.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46169,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Papers","volume":"65 1","pages":"16-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8454.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the safe-haven attributes of green bonds, gold, and bitcoin are compared to those of traditional bonds under various time periods and quantiles by using the WQC methodology. The results indicate that green bonds exhibited a stable safe-haven function at longer time horizons during the full sample period, whereas other assets did not have safe-haven features. During the COVID-19 pandemic, bitcoin exhibited safe-haven attributes at all time horizons, whereas gold demonstrated these characteristics over the short and medium terms. In the sample period during the Russia–Ukraine war, green bonds had strong safe-haven properties at shorter and middle time horizons, whereas bitcoin had these properties at longer time spans. In this paper, a multivariate network framework that includes green bonds, gold, and bitcoin is constructed, and the theoretical foundations that influence the safe-haven attributes of assets are detailed. In addition, this study clearly presents the safe-haven effects of assets under various sample periods, time horizons, and quantiles, thereby bridging the gap of existing studies that ignore time frequency. Thus, this paper provides advice for investors, regulators, and policy-makers, such as choosing portfolios on the basis of asset characteristics, monitoring asset disclosure, and encouraging the trading of safe-haven assets.

检验绿色债券、黄金和比特币对传统债券的避险特性:小波分位数相关方法
本文采用WQC方法,将绿色债券、黄金和比特币的避险属性与传统债券在不同时间段和分位数下的避险属性进行了比较。结果表明,在整个样本期内,绿色债券在更长的时间范围内表现出稳定的避险功能,而其他资产则不具备避险功能。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,比特币在所有时间范围内都表现出避险属性,而黄金在中短期内表现出这些特征。在俄罗斯-乌克兰战争期间的样本期间,绿色债券在较短和中期的时间范围内具有很强的避险属性,而比特币在较长时间范围内具有这些属性。本文构建了包括绿色债券、黄金、比特币在内的多元网络框架,详细阐述了影响资产避险属性的理论基础。此外,本研究清晰地呈现了资产在不同样本时期、时间范围和分位数下的避险效应,弥补了现有研究忽略时间频率的不足。因此,本文为投资者、监管机构和政策制定者提供了根据资产特征选择投资组合、监控资产披露、鼓励避险资产交易等建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Australian Economic Papers publishes innovative and thought provoking contributions that extend the frontiers of the subject, written by leading international economists in theoretical, empirical and policy economics. Australian Economic Papers is a forum for debate between theorists, econometricians and policy analysts and covers an exceptionally wide range of topics on all the major fields of economics as well as: theoretical and empirical industrial organisation, theoretical and empirical labour economics and, macro and micro policy analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书