EIGENSINN AND DOMINATION IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL SOCIETIES

IF 0.9 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
History and Theory Pub Date : 2026-02-23 Epub Date: 2025-12-12 DOI:10.1111/hith.70021
Alf Lüdtke, Alexandra Oeser
{"title":"EIGENSINN AND DOMINATION IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL SOCIETIES","authors":"Alf Lüdtke,&nbsp;Alexandra Oeser","doi":"10.1111/hith.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is a posthumously published text that was written by Alf Lüdtke and Alexandra Oeser but was left unfinished when Lüdtke died in February 2019. It examines two central notions—and their articulations—that Lüdtke and Oeser use differently in their work: domination and <i>Eigensinn</i>. On domination, it focuses on perspectives of Max Weber's work and different translations in English and French that have led to distinct receptions of the notion of domination in these languages. While locating the notion of <i>Eigensinn</i> back in its 1980s academic context, this article reconceptualizes <i>Eigensinn</i> as a blind spot of Weber's definition of domination that addresses the question of <i>how</i> people produce a “will to obey,” which Weber's work does not tackle. The article also debates the possibilities of using the notion of <i>Eigensinn</i> for liberal and illiberal societies. Oeser has written an introduction to guide the reader through the text and to recall the conditions surrounding its production.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 1","pages":"32-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hith.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a posthumously published text that was written by Alf Lüdtke and Alexandra Oeser but was left unfinished when Lüdtke died in February 2019. It examines two central notions—and their articulations—that Lüdtke and Oeser use differently in their work: domination and Eigensinn. On domination, it focuses on perspectives of Max Weber's work and different translations in English and French that have led to distinct receptions of the notion of domination in these languages. While locating the notion of Eigensinn back in its 1980s academic context, this article reconceptualizes Eigensinn as a blind spot of Weber's definition of domination that addresses the question of how people produce a “will to obey,” which Weber's work does not tackle. The article also debates the possibilities of using the notion of Eigensinn for liberal and illiberal societies. Oeser has written an introduction to guide the reader through the text and to recall the conditions surrounding its production.

自由与非自由社会中的特征罪与统治
这篇文章是由Alf l dtke和Alexandra Oeser撰写的遗作,但在l dtke于2019年2月去世时尚未完成。它考察了两个中心概念——支配和本征正弦,这两个概念在 dtke和Oeser的研究中使用的方式不同。在统治方面,它侧重于马克思·韦伯作品的观点以及英法两种不同的翻译,这些翻译导致了两种语言对统治概念的不同接受。这篇文章将特征sinn的概念定位在其1980年代的学术背景中,将特征sinn重新定义为韦伯统治定义的盲点,该定义解决了人们如何产生“服从意志”的问题,而韦伯的工作并没有解决这个问题。本文还讨论了在自由和非自由社会中使用本征正弦概念的可能性。Oeser写了一篇导论,引导读者通过文本,并回忆其生产周围的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Theory
History and Theory Multiple-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书