The Brittle Ring Test: A Simple and Reliable Method for Evaluating the Fracture Strength of Technical Ceramics—Theoretical and Experimental Investigations

Achim Rübling, Pascal Hölzel, Alexander Pilder, Laura Hönisch, Moritz Schrodberger, Marcel Kleyla, Martin Bartecki, Katja Süchting-Rose, Hannes Kühl
{"title":"The Brittle Ring Test: A Simple and Reliable Method for Evaluating the Fracture Strength of Technical Ceramics—Theoretical and Experimental Investigations","authors":"Achim Rübling,&nbsp;Pascal Hölzel,&nbsp;Alexander Pilder,&nbsp;Laura Hönisch,&nbsp;Moritz Schrodberger,&nbsp;Marcel Kleyla,&nbsp;Martin Bartecki,&nbsp;Katja Süchting-Rose,&nbsp;Hannes Kühl","doi":"10.1002/ces2.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In contrast to the three- and four-point method as well as the C-ring tests, the brittle ring test, where ceramic rings are tested under diametral compression, is a simple and time-saving method for measuring the fracture strength of technical ceramics, as the ceramic samples can be measured as fired without time-consuming hard machining. The authors evaluate the various formulas that have been established over the past 100 years for determining the fracture strength of ring-shaped samples and present an adapted formula that is by far best suited for calculating the strength in comparison to the other formulas. This is illustrated using the example of uniaxially dry-pressed alumina specimens with different ring geometries. If certain conditions are observed, such as a suitable ratio of inner to outer radius and a ring height that is not too large, the brittle ring method is ideal for determining valid strength values of technical ceramics without a great deal of preparation work.</p>","PeriodicalId":13948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ceramic Engineering & Science","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ces2.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ceramic Engineering & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ces2.70047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast to the three- and four-point method as well as the C-ring tests, the brittle ring test, where ceramic rings are tested under diametral compression, is a simple and time-saving method for measuring the fracture strength of technical ceramics, as the ceramic samples can be measured as fired without time-consuming hard machining. The authors evaluate the various formulas that have been established over the past 100 years for determining the fracture strength of ring-shaped samples and present an adapted formula that is by far best suited for calculating the strength in comparison to the other formulas. This is illustrated using the example of uniaxially dry-pressed alumina specimens with different ring geometries. If certain conditions are observed, such as a suitable ratio of inner to outer radius and a ring height that is not too large, the brittle ring method is ideal for determining valid strength values of technical ceramics without a great deal of preparation work.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脆环试验:一种简单可靠的评价工业陶瓷断裂强度的方法——理论与实验研究
与三点法和四点法以及c环试验相比,脆性环试验是一种测量工业陶瓷断裂强度的简单而省时的方法,因为陶瓷样品可以在烧制时测量,而无需耗时的硬加工。脆性环试验是在直径压缩下测试陶瓷环。作者评估了在过去100年中建立的各种公式,用于确定环形样品的断裂强度,并提出了一个与其他公式相比迄今为止最适合计算强度的适应性公式。这是用具有不同环形几何形状的单轴干压氧化铝试样的例子来说明的。如果观察到一定的条件,如合适的内外半径比和环高度不太大,则脆环法是确定工业陶瓷有效强度值的理想方法,无需大量的准备工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书