Common and Disease-Specific EEG Microstate Alterations Across Alzheimer′s Disease, Parkinson′s Disease, Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia, and Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Disease Comparison

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shiyang Lv, Xiangying Ran, Huijing Xiang, Nian Wang, Zhengrong Zhou, Lei Chen
{"title":"Common and Disease-Specific EEG Microstate Alterations Across Alzheimer′s Disease, Parkinson′s Disease, Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia, and Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Disease Comparison","authors":"Shiyang Lv,&nbsp;Xiangying Ran,&nbsp;Huijing Xiang,&nbsp;Nian Wang,&nbsp;Zhengrong Zhou,&nbsp;Lei Chen","doi":"10.1155/ane/7974554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Alzheimer′s disease (AD), Parkinson′s disease (PD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), and multiple sclerosis (MS) are common neurological disorders that disrupt brain networks and impair cognition and emotion. EEG microstates, as spatiotemporal markers of brain activity, have attracted increasing attention. They capture rapid large-scale brain dynamics on the millisecond timescale, offering a novel way to explore shared and distinct features across neurological disorders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 123 participants were included in this study, 35 with AD, 18 with bvFTD, 16 with PD, 22 with MS, and 32 healthy controls (HCs). High-density EEG signals were recorded during eyes-closed resting state. EEG microstate analysis was performed to extract duration, occurrence, and coverage for each microstate class. Group differences were examined using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests, as appropriate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with HC, patients with AD showed increased duration, occurrence, and coverage of Microstate C, and reduced occurrence and coverage of Microstate D. In PD, the duration of Microstate A was significantly reduced, whereas the occurrence and coverage of Microstate C were significantly elevated. The MS group showed partial differences relative to AD and PD, whereas no significant alterations were observed in bvFTD. Overall, Microstates C and D showed potential as cross-diagnostic electrophysiological biomarkers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study identified disorder-specific microstate alterations, with the most prominent differences in Microstates C and D. Notably, the divergence in Microstate D between AD and PD may reflect distinct mechanisms of network disruption. These findings provide new insights into the network-level pathophysiology of neurological disorders and highlight the promise of EEG microstates as transdiagnostic biomarkers for characterizing large-scale functional impairments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/7974554","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/7974554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer′s disease (AD), Parkinson′s disease (PD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), and multiple sclerosis (MS) are common neurological disorders that disrupt brain networks and impair cognition and emotion. EEG microstates, as spatiotemporal markers of brain activity, have attracted increasing attention. They capture rapid large-scale brain dynamics on the millisecond timescale, offering a novel way to explore shared and distinct features across neurological disorders.

Methods

A total of 123 participants were included in this study, 35 with AD, 18 with bvFTD, 16 with PD, 22 with MS, and 32 healthy controls (HCs). High-density EEG signals were recorded during eyes-closed resting state. EEG microstate analysis was performed to extract duration, occurrence, and coverage for each microstate class. Group differences were examined using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests, as appropriate.

Results

Compared with HC, patients with AD showed increased duration, occurrence, and coverage of Microstate C, and reduced occurrence and coverage of Microstate D. In PD, the duration of Microstate A was significantly reduced, whereas the occurrence and coverage of Microstate C were significantly elevated. The MS group showed partial differences relative to AD and PD, whereas no significant alterations were observed in bvFTD. Overall, Microstates C and D showed potential as cross-diagnostic electrophysiological biomarkers.

Conclusion

This study identified disorder-specific microstate alterations, with the most prominent differences in Microstates C and D. Notably, the divergence in Microstate D between AD and PD may reflect distinct mechanisms of network disruption. These findings provide new insights into the network-level pathophysiology of neurological disorders and highlight the promise of EEG microstates as transdiagnostic biomarkers for characterizing large-scale functional impairments.

Abstract Image

阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病、行为变异额颞叶痴呆和多发性硬化症的常见和疾病特异性脑电图微状态改变:一项跨疾病比较
阿尔茨海默病(AD)、帕金森病(PD)、行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)和多发性硬化症(MS)是常见的神经系统疾病,它们会破坏大脑网络,损害认知和情感。脑电微态作为脑活动的时空标记物,越来越受到人们的关注。他们在毫秒时间尺度上捕捉到快速大规模的大脑动态,为探索神经系统疾病的共同和独特特征提供了一种新颖的方法。方法共纳入123例受试者,其中AD患者35例,bvFTD患者18例,PD患者16例,MS患者22例,健康对照32例。闭眼静息状态下记录高密度脑电图信号。进行脑电图微状态分析,提取每个微状态类别的持续时间、发生率和覆盖率。组间差异采用单因素方差分析或Kruskal-Wallis检验(视情况而定)。结果与HC相比,AD患者微状态C的持续时间、发生率和覆盖率增加,而微状态d的发生率和覆盖率降低。PD中,微状态A的持续时间显著减少,而微状态C的发生率和覆盖率显著升高。MS组相对于AD和PD表现出部分差异,而bvFTD没有明显改变。总体而言,微状态C和D显示出作为交叉诊断电生理生物标志物的潜力。本研究发现了疾病特异性的微状态改变,其中微状态C和D的差异最为显著。值得注意的是,AD和PD之间微状态D的差异可能反映了不同的网络破坏机制。这些发现为神经系统疾病的网络水平病理生理学提供了新的见解,并强调了脑电图微状态作为表征大规模功能障碍的跨诊断生物标志物的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书