PREAMBULAR HISTORY: THE VIEW OF THE PAST IN KEY HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS

IF 0.9 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
History and Theory Pub Date : 2026-02-23 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1111/hith.70000
Antoon De Baets
{"title":"PREAMBULAR HISTORY: THE VIEW OF THE PAST IN KEY HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS","authors":"Antoon De Baets","doi":"10.1111/hith.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article claims that the preambles of foundational human rights instruments, taken together, articulate a consistent view of the past. This view is firmly rooted in historical processes, embedded in metaphysical truths, and enacted in service of the future. Part 1 assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the “preambular approach to history” and selects four instruments from a group of twenty-two: the United Nations Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Genocide Convention, and the International Criminal Court Statute. Part 2 reconstructs the discussions during which the historical recitals in the preambles of these instruments emerged. Part 3 analyzes these findings. In writing the historical recitals, the drafters of these key instruments opted for either the approach of the contemporary historian (the “recent history approach”) or the approach of the philosopher of history (“the holistic approach”). Both approaches are explained and compared. The conclusion contains a thought experiment in which the human rights view of the past embedded in these historical recitals is articulated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 1","pages":"3-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hith.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article claims that the preambles of foundational human rights instruments, taken together, articulate a consistent view of the past. This view is firmly rooted in historical processes, embedded in metaphysical truths, and enacted in service of the future. Part 1 assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the “preambular approach to history” and selects four instruments from a group of twenty-two: the United Nations Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Genocide Convention, and the International Criminal Court Statute. Part 2 reconstructs the discussions during which the historical recitals in the preambles of these instruments emerged. Part 3 analyzes these findings. In writing the historical recitals, the drafters of these key instruments opted for either the approach of the contemporary historian (the “recent history approach”) or the approach of the philosopher of history (“the holistic approach”). Both approaches are explained and compared. The conclusion contains a thought experiment in which the human rights view of the past embedded in these historical recitals is articulated.

序言部分历史:主要人权文书对过去的看法
这篇文章声称,各项基本人权文书的序言合在一起阐明了对过去的一贯看法。这种观点牢牢扎根于历史进程中,嵌入于形而上学的真理中,并为未来服务。第一部分评估了“序言式历史研究方法”的优缺点,并从22份文书中选择了四份:《联合国宪章》、《世界人权宣言》、《灭绝种族罪公约》和国际刑事法院规约。第二部分重建了这些文书序言中出现的历史回顾的讨论过程。第3部分分析了这些发现。在撰写历史评论时,这些关键文书的起草者要么选择了当代历史学家的方法(“近代史方法”),要么选择了历史哲学家的方法(“整体方法”)。对这两种方法进行了解释和比较。结论部分包含了一个思想实验,在这个思想实验中,这些历史叙述阐述了对过去的人权观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Theory
History and Theory Multiple-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书