Nondenominational Protestants: Do They More Closely Resemble Mainline, Evangelical, or Black Protestants in RELTRAD?

IF 2.3 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Pub Date : 2026-03-09 Epub Date: 2025-12-09 DOI:10.1111/jssr.70011
Jason E. Shelton
{"title":"Nondenominational Protestants: Do They More Closely Resemble Mainline, Evangelical, or Black Protestants in RELTRAD?","authors":"Jason E. Shelton","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to determine whether different groups of nondenominational Protestants more closely resemble one of the three most widely recognized denominational families within American Protestantism: Mainline Protestants, Evangelical Protestants, and Black Protestants. Steensland et al.’s and Gaghan and Eagle's RELTRAD coding schemes are modified to include contested categories of nondenoms that are disaggregated by race and church attendance. Findings from the 2000–2022 General Social Surveys indicate that the coding schemes capture similar variation between Black nondenoms and members of historically Black Protestant denominational families. However, non-Black nondenoms who attend less than once a <i>year</i> significantly differ from followers of historically Mainline Protestant denominations, and non-Black nondenoms who attend more than once per <i>month</i> report more conservative religious sensibilities as well as political and social attitudes than members of historically Evangelical Protestant traditions. Such findings attest to both strengths and limitations within the RELTRAD taxonomies under analysis. Consequently, further research is needed to inform durable decisions regarding the treatment of data for non-Black nondenoms in RELTRAD. Suggestions for improvement are offered—including what now appears to be arbitrary cut-off points used to distinguish between nondenominational Protestants—in helping scholars produce more accurate statistical estimates for Protestants who do not affiliate with established traditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 1","pages":"123-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.70011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether different groups of nondenominational Protestants more closely resemble one of the three most widely recognized denominational families within American Protestantism: Mainline Protestants, Evangelical Protestants, and Black Protestants. Steensland et al.’s and Gaghan and Eagle's RELTRAD coding schemes are modified to include contested categories of nondenoms that are disaggregated by race and church attendance. Findings from the 2000–2022 General Social Surveys indicate that the coding schemes capture similar variation between Black nondenoms and members of historically Black Protestant denominational families. However, non-Black nondenoms who attend less than once a year significantly differ from followers of historically Mainline Protestant denominations, and non-Black nondenoms who attend more than once per month report more conservative religious sensibilities as well as political and social attitudes than members of historically Evangelical Protestant traditions. Such findings attest to both strengths and limitations within the RELTRAD taxonomies under analysis. Consequently, further research is needed to inform durable decisions regarding the treatment of data for non-Black nondenoms in RELTRAD. Suggestions for improvement are offered—including what now appears to be arbitrary cut-off points used to distinguish between nondenominational Protestants—in helping scholars produce more accurate statistical estimates for Protestants who do not affiliate with established traditions.

非教派新教徒:他们是否更接近主流、福音派或黑人新教徒?
本研究旨在确定不同的非宗派新教徒群体是否更接近美国新教中最广泛认可的三个宗派家庭之一:主流新教徒、福音派新教徒和黑人新教徒。Steensland等人,Gaghan和Eagle的RELTRAD编码方案被修改,以包括按种族和教堂出席率分类的有争议的非denoms类别。2000-2022年综合社会调查的结果表明,编码方案在黑人非教徒和历史上的黑人新教教派家庭成员之间捕捉到了类似的差异。然而,每年参加少于一次的非黑人不信教者与历史上主流新教教派的追随者显著不同,而每月参加一次以上的非黑人不信教者比历史上福音派新教传统的成员表现出更保守的宗教敏感性以及政治和社会态度。这些发现证明了所分析的RELTRAD分类法的优势和局限性。因此,需要进一步的研究来为RELTRAD中关于非黑人非denoms数据处理的持久决策提供信息。他们提出了一些改进的建议——包括现在看来是用来区分非宗派新教徒的武断的分界点——以帮助学者们对那些不隶属于既定传统的新教徒做出更准确的统计估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews on the social scientific study of religion. Published articles are representative of the best current theoretical and methodological treatments of religion. Substantive areas include both micro-level analysis of religious organizations, institutions, and social change. While many articles published in the journal are sociological, the journal also publishes the work of psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and economists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书