History and the Will to Power: Foucault and Nietzsche on Genealogy

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2026-03-18 Epub Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1111/ejop.70010
Anthony Garruzzo
{"title":"History and the Will to Power: Foucault and Nietzsche on Genealogy","authors":"Anthony Garruzzo","doi":"10.1111/ejop.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in genealogy among social and political philosophers. I argue, however, that this growing literature has tended to obscure what distinguishes genealogy as an approach to the interpretation of history. Any normative evaluation of something that appeals to an account of its origins has come to be called a “genealogy,” even if this account is explicitly hypothetical or unabashedly teleological. But a genealogy, according to Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault, is not merely an account of origins: it is an account of the <i>contingent</i> origins of the <i>integration</i> of an institution, practice, or concept within a regime of <i>power</i> and <i>control</i>. In other words, genealogy investigates an institution, practice, or concept through the lens of what Nietzsche calls “the will to power.” This paper aims to reconstruct the conception of the will to power Foucault inherits from Nietzsche in a way that explains why investigations into struggles for power from the past can provide insight into the strategies used for exercising and maintaining power in the present. The critical contribution of genealogy, I argue, is not normative insight but <i>tactical knowledge</i>: to oppose something successfully, first you must <i>know your enemy</i>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46958,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"34 1","pages":"191-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.70010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in genealogy among social and political philosophers. I argue, however, that this growing literature has tended to obscure what distinguishes genealogy as an approach to the interpretation of history. Any normative evaluation of something that appeals to an account of its origins has come to be called a “genealogy,” even if this account is explicitly hypothetical or unabashedly teleological. But a genealogy, according to Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault, is not merely an account of origins: it is an account of the contingent origins of the integration of an institution, practice, or concept within a regime of power and control. In other words, genealogy investigates an institution, practice, or concept through the lens of what Nietzsche calls “the will to power.” This paper aims to reconstruct the conception of the will to power Foucault inherits from Nietzsche in a way that explains why investigations into struggles for power from the past can provide insight into the strategies used for exercising and maintaining power in the present. The critical contribution of genealogy, I argue, is not normative insight but tactical knowledge: to oppose something successfully, first you must know your enemy.

历史与权力意志:福柯与尼采的宗谱论
近年来,社会和政治哲学家对系谱学的兴趣有所复兴。然而,我认为,这种不断增长的文学倾向于模糊家谱作为一种解释历史的方法的区别。任何对事物的规范性评价,只要诉诸于对其起源的描述,就被称为“系谱学”,即使这种描述是明确假设的,或者是毫不掩饰的目的论。但是,根据弗里德里希·尼采和米歇尔·福柯的观点,家谱不仅仅是对起源的描述:它是对权力和控制体制内的制度、实践或概念整合的偶然起源的描述。换句话说,系谱学通过尼采所说的“权力意志”来研究一个制度、实践或概念。本文旨在重建福柯从尼采那里继承的权力意志的概念,以某种方式解释为什么对过去的权力斗争的调查可以提供对当前行使和维持权力的策略的洞察。我认为,系谱学的关键贡献不是规范性的洞察力,而是战术知识:要成功地反对某件事,首先你必须了解你的敌人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: ''Founded by Mark Sacks in 1993, the European Journal of Philosophy has come to occupy a distinctive and highly valued place amongst the philosophical journals. The aim of EJP has been to bring together the best work from those working within the "analytic" and "continental" traditions, and to encourage connections between them, without diluting their respective priorities and concerns. This has enabled EJP to publish a wide range of material of the highest standard from philosophers across the world, reflecting the best thinking from a variety of philosophical perspectives, in a way that is accessible to all of them.''
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书