Unlocking Privacy in Healthcare: The Impact of Explanations on Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure to Conversational Technologies

IF 10.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Operations Management Pub Date : 2026-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1002/joom.70026
Hashai Papneja, Sarv Devaraj
{"title":"Unlocking Privacy in Healthcare: The Impact of Explanations on Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure to Conversational Technologies","authors":"Hashai Papneja,&nbsp;Sarv Devaraj","doi":"10.1002/joom.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While artificial intelligence (AI)-based conversational technologies offer exciting prospects in healthcare, the lack of transparency and elevated privacy concerns in using such technologies remain a challenge and make much-needed information difficult to obtain while administering patient care. Approaches that emphasize transparency and interpretability of AI systems provide a promising avenue to address these concerns. In this study, we explore the role of transparency-enhancing explanations as a way for caregivers to elicit truthful disclosure of otherwise private information from patients. Specifically, we explore how automated explanations provisioned by conversational technologies can help reduce the user's privacy concerns and bring about self-disclosure, thus helping to improve key outcomes such as accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Through an online experiment with 556 participants in a healthcare context, we uncover the mediating effects of two critical factors, informational justice and perceived relevance, on privacy concerns. We find that explanations foster perceptions of informational justice and perceived relevance in the user, which help reduce privacy concerns and bring about self-disclosure. The study's findings have implications for researchers as well as practitioners who leverage conversational technologies in healthcare and other service contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 2","pages":"316-351"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI)-based conversational technologies offer exciting prospects in healthcare, the lack of transparency and elevated privacy concerns in using such technologies remain a challenge and make much-needed information difficult to obtain while administering patient care. Approaches that emphasize transparency and interpretability of AI systems provide a promising avenue to address these concerns. In this study, we explore the role of transparency-enhancing explanations as a way for caregivers to elicit truthful disclosure of otherwise private information from patients. Specifically, we explore how automated explanations provisioned by conversational technologies can help reduce the user's privacy concerns and bring about self-disclosure, thus helping to improve key outcomes such as accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Through an online experiment with 556 participants in a healthcare context, we uncover the mediating effects of two critical factors, informational justice and perceived relevance, on privacy concerns. We find that explanations foster perceptions of informational justice and perceived relevance in the user, which help reduce privacy concerns and bring about self-disclosure. The study's findings have implications for researchers as well as practitioners who leverage conversational technologies in healthcare and other service contexts.

Abstract Image

解锁医疗保健中的隐私:对隐私问题和自我披露的解释对会话技术的影响
虽然基于人工智能(AI)的会话技术在医疗保健领域提供了令人兴奋的前景,但在使用这些技术时缺乏透明度和隐私问题仍然是一个挑战,并且在管理患者护理时难以获得急需的信息。强调人工智能系统的透明度和可解释性的方法为解决这些问题提供了一个有希望的途径。在本研究中,我们探讨了透明度增强解释的作用,作为一种方式,为护理人员引出真实的披露,否则私人信息从患者。具体来说,我们探讨了由会话技术提供的自动解释如何帮助减少用户对隐私的担忧并带来自我披露,从而有助于提高关键结果,如准确的诊断和有效的治疗。通过在医疗保健环境中对556名参与者进行的在线实验,我们发现了信息公正和感知相关性这两个关键因素对隐私问题的中介作用。我们发现,解释促进了用户对信息公正和感知相关性的感知,这有助于减少隐私担忧并带来自我披露。该研究的发现对研究人员以及在医疗保健和其他服务环境中利用会话技术的从业者具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书