The Double-Edged Sword of Servant Leadership: Motivational Climates, Helping Behavior, and Financial Performance

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2026-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1002/job.70031
Therese Egeland, Alexander Madsen Sandvik, Vidar Schei, Claudia Buengeler
{"title":"The Double-Edged Sword of Servant Leadership: Motivational Climates, Helping Behavior, and Financial Performance","authors":"Therese Egeland,&nbsp;Alexander Madsen Sandvik,&nbsp;Vidar Schei,&nbsp;Claudia Buengeler","doi":"10.1002/job.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on the effects of servant leadership on firm success has yielded inconsistent results. Connecting servant leadership theory to achievement goal theory, we theorize that servant leadership exerts both beneficial and detrimental effects on firms by shaping two distinct motivational climates: mastery climate and performance climate. These climates, in turn, serve as mechanisms linking servant leadership to two complementary dimensions of firm success: relational outcomes (firm helping behavior) and performance outcomes (financial performance). We tested these assertions using a two-study design comprising an experimental study with 99 simulated firms working for a fictitious leader (Study 1) and a multisource, time-lagged field study of 120 small firms and their leaders (Study 2). Study 1 demonstrated that servant leadership strengthens firm mastery climate and weakens firm performance climate relative to a control condition (directive leadership). Study 2 revealed that servant leadership was positively related to firm helping behavior mediated by firm mastery climate but negatively related to firm financial performance mediated by firm performance climate. This negative indirect relationship was moderated by autonomy in the firm, which weakened the positive effect of firm performance climate on firm financial performance. Our findings clarify both the benefits and pitfalls of servant leadership for firms, highlighting that its relational advantages may come at the expense of financial outcomes under certain conditions. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of when and how servant leadership is advantageous for organizational success.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"47 3","pages":"497-517"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the effects of servant leadership on firm success has yielded inconsistent results. Connecting servant leadership theory to achievement goal theory, we theorize that servant leadership exerts both beneficial and detrimental effects on firms by shaping two distinct motivational climates: mastery climate and performance climate. These climates, in turn, serve as mechanisms linking servant leadership to two complementary dimensions of firm success: relational outcomes (firm helping behavior) and performance outcomes (financial performance). We tested these assertions using a two-study design comprising an experimental study with 99 simulated firms working for a fictitious leader (Study 1) and a multisource, time-lagged field study of 120 small firms and their leaders (Study 2). Study 1 demonstrated that servant leadership strengthens firm mastery climate and weakens firm performance climate relative to a control condition (directive leadership). Study 2 revealed that servant leadership was positively related to firm helping behavior mediated by firm mastery climate but negatively related to firm financial performance mediated by firm performance climate. This negative indirect relationship was moderated by autonomy in the firm, which weakened the positive effect of firm performance climate on firm financial performance. Our findings clarify both the benefits and pitfalls of servant leadership for firms, highlighting that its relational advantages may come at the expense of financial outcomes under certain conditions. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of when and how servant leadership is advantageous for organizational success.

Abstract Image

仆人式领导的双刃剑:激励氛围、帮助行为和财务绩效
关于服务型领导对企业成功影响的研究得出了不一致的结果。将服务型领导理论与成就目标理论相结合,我们认为服务型领导通过塑造两种不同的激励气候:掌握气候和绩效气候,对企业产生有益和有害的影响。这些氛围反过来又作为一种机制,将服务型领导与企业成功的两个互补维度联系起来:关系结果(企业帮助行为)和绩效结果(财务绩效)。我们使用两项研究设计来检验这些断言,其中包括一项实验研究,其中99家模拟公司为一个虚构的领导者工作(研究1),以及对120家小公司及其领导者进行多源、时间滞后的实地研究(研究2)。研究1表明,相对于一种控制条件(指令性领导),服务型领导强化了企业掌握氛围,削弱了企业绩效氛围。研究2发现,服务型领导与企业掌握气候介导的企业帮助行为正相关,与企业绩效气候介导的企业财务绩效负相关。这种负向的间接关系被公司的自主性所调节,这削弱了公司绩效气候对公司财务绩效的积极影响。我们的研究结果阐明了服务型领导对企业的好处和缺陷,强调了在某些条件下,服务型领导的关系优势可能以牺牲财务结果为代价。这项研究有助于更细致地理解仆人式领导何时以及如何有利于组织成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书