Guns and Roses: Hard Power, Soft Power and Economic Growth

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change Pub Date : 2026-03-02 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1111/ecot.70019
Serhan Cevik, Tales Padilha
{"title":"Guns and Roses: Hard Power, Soft Power and Economic Growth","authors":"Serhan Cevik,&nbsp;Tales Padilha","doi":"10.1111/ecot.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Growth remains the holy grail of economics. Although our understanding of long-term growth dynamics has advanced considerably, the question of why some countries grow faster than others continues to be a critical area of empirical inquiry. This paper represents the first comprehensive attempt in literature to examine the relationship between hard power, soft power and economic growth across a broad panel of countries. Although previous research has explored the connection between military power and economic growth, the findings regarding this relationship remain inconclusive. Additionally, there is a notable gap in literature concerning the economic effects of soft power. To address this gap, we utilise the multidimensional Global Soft Power Index (GSPI) developed by Cevik and Padilha and apply a range of econometric methodologies to ensure a robust and granular analysis. Our findings indicate that soft power, as measured by the GSPI, exerts a statistically significant and positive impact on long-term economic growth. In contrast, military spending appears to have no significant effect and is negatively correlated with growth. Importantly, the economic influence of soft power is more pronounced in developing countries than in advanced economies. Disaggregating the GSPI reveals that certain dimensions—Commercial Prowess, Culture, Digital Footprint and Global Reach—have a stronger effect on growth than others, such as Education and Institutions, likely reflecting the slower-moving nature of the latter components. Overall, the results highlight the critical role of soft power in shaping growth trajectories, particularly in contexts where traditional growth drivers are less entrenched.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"34 2","pages":"411-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growth remains the holy grail of economics. Although our understanding of long-term growth dynamics has advanced considerably, the question of why some countries grow faster than others continues to be a critical area of empirical inquiry. This paper represents the first comprehensive attempt in literature to examine the relationship between hard power, soft power and economic growth across a broad panel of countries. Although previous research has explored the connection between military power and economic growth, the findings regarding this relationship remain inconclusive. Additionally, there is a notable gap in literature concerning the economic effects of soft power. To address this gap, we utilise the multidimensional Global Soft Power Index (GSPI) developed by Cevik and Padilha and apply a range of econometric methodologies to ensure a robust and granular analysis. Our findings indicate that soft power, as measured by the GSPI, exerts a statistically significant and positive impact on long-term economic growth. In contrast, military spending appears to have no significant effect and is negatively correlated with growth. Importantly, the economic influence of soft power is more pronounced in developing countries than in advanced economies. Disaggregating the GSPI reveals that certain dimensions—Commercial Prowess, Culture, Digital Footprint and Global Reach—have a stronger effect on growth than others, such as Education and Institutions, likely reflecting the slower-moving nature of the latter components. Overall, the results highlight the critical role of soft power in shaping growth trajectories, particularly in contexts where traditional growth drivers are less entrenched.

枪与玫瑰:硬实力、软实力与经济增长
增长仍然是经济学的圣杯。尽管我们对长期增长动态的理解有了很大的进步,但为什么一些国家比其他国家增长得更快的问题仍然是实证研究的一个关键领域。本文代表了文献中第一次全面的尝试,通过广泛的国家面板来研究硬实力、软实力和经济增长之间的关系。虽然以前的研究已经探讨了军事实力和经济增长之间的联系,但关于这种关系的发现仍然没有定论。此外,关于软实力的经济效应的文献也存在明显的空白。为了解决这一差距,我们利用了由Cevik和Padilha开发的多维全球软实力指数(GSPI),并应用了一系列计量经济学方法来确保稳健和细致的分析。研究结果表明,以GSPI衡量的软实力对长期经济增长具有统计学显著的正向影响。相比之下,军费开支似乎没有显著影响,而且与经济增长呈负相关。重要的是,软实力的经济影响在发展中国家比在发达经济体更为明显。对GSPI进行分解后发现,某些维度——商业实力、文化、数字足迹和全球影响力——对增长的影响比其他维度(如教育和机构)更大,这可能反映了后者组成部分的缓慢变化本质。总体而言,研究结果突出了软实力在塑造增长轨迹方面的关键作用,特别是在传统增长动力不那么根深蒂固的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书