Investigation of Inducer Geometry Variations on Centrifugal Pump Hydraulic Performance: Numerical Approach

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Davoud Pourabdollah, Peyman Sobhani, Amir F. Najafi
{"title":"Investigation of Inducer Geometry Variations on Centrifugal Pump Hydraulic Performance: Numerical Approach","authors":"Davoud Pourabdollah,&nbsp;Peyman Sobhani,&nbsp;Amir F. Najafi","doi":"10.1002/fld.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Efficient suction performance and cavitation resistance are critical challenges in high-speed, low-pressure centrifugal pumps, and inducers, which are helical axial-flow components positioned upstream of pump impellers, play a pivotal role in addressing these challenges. This study evaluates the influence of inducer geometric parameters on impeller inlet pressure to identify configurations that enhance suction performance and reduce cavitation risk in centrifugal pumps. Experimentally validated three-dimensional numerical simulations were conducted to investigate the effects of hub-to-tip diameter ratio, blade angle, and blade number, which were systematically varied to examine their impact on pressure recovery and flow stability. Results show that decreasing the hub-to-tip ratio from 0.59 to 0.33 increased the average static pressure ratio at the impeller inlet from 1.12 to 1.38, corresponding to a 14%–23% improvement in suction performance. Increasing the blade angle from 15° to 30° enhanced local inlet pressure by 6%–30%, raising the pressure ratio from 1.10 to 1.43, while increasing the blade number from 2 to 4 yielded a 17%–23% pressure rise, with the pressure ratio increasing from 1.18 to 1.40. The optimal configuration with a hub-to-tip ratio of 0.33, blade angle of 30°, and four blades reduced the low-pressure region near the hub by approximately 28%, indicating improved cavitation resistance. Flow visualization using meridional streamlines and static pressure contours confirmed smoother acceleration and reduced recirculation for the optimized design. These findings provide quantitative insights into inducer geometry optimization and offer guidance for enhancing suction capability and designing high-performance centrifugal pumps.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"98 4","pages":"529-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient suction performance and cavitation resistance are critical challenges in high-speed, low-pressure centrifugal pumps, and inducers, which are helical axial-flow components positioned upstream of pump impellers, play a pivotal role in addressing these challenges. This study evaluates the influence of inducer geometric parameters on impeller inlet pressure to identify configurations that enhance suction performance and reduce cavitation risk in centrifugal pumps. Experimentally validated three-dimensional numerical simulations were conducted to investigate the effects of hub-to-tip diameter ratio, blade angle, and blade number, which were systematically varied to examine their impact on pressure recovery and flow stability. Results show that decreasing the hub-to-tip ratio from 0.59 to 0.33 increased the average static pressure ratio at the impeller inlet from 1.12 to 1.38, corresponding to a 14%–23% improvement in suction performance. Increasing the blade angle from 15° to 30° enhanced local inlet pressure by 6%–30%, raising the pressure ratio from 1.10 to 1.43, while increasing the blade number from 2 to 4 yielded a 17%–23% pressure rise, with the pressure ratio increasing from 1.18 to 1.40. The optimal configuration with a hub-to-tip ratio of 0.33, blade angle of 30°, and four blades reduced the low-pressure region near the hub by approximately 28%, indicating improved cavitation resistance. Flow visualization using meridional streamlines and static pressure contours confirmed smoother acceleration and reduced recirculation for the optimized design. These findings provide quantitative insights into inducer geometry optimization and offer guidance for enhancing suction capability and designing high-performance centrifugal pumps.

诱导体几何变化对离心泵水力性能的影响研究:数值方法
高效的吸入性能和抗空化是高速低压离心泵面临的关键挑战,而诱导器是位于泵叶轮上游的螺旋轴流部件,在解决这些挑战方面起着关键作用。本研究评估了诱导体几何参数对叶轮进口压力的影响,以确定提高离心泵吸入性能和降低空化风险的配置。通过实验验证的三维数值模拟,研究了轮毂与叶尖直径比、叶片角度和叶片数量的变化对压力恢复和流动稳定性的影响。结果表明:将叶轮进口平均静压比从0.59降低到0.33,叶轮进口平均静压比从1.12提高到1.38,吸力性能提高14% ~ 23%;当叶片角从15°增加到30°时,局部进口压力提高了6% ~ 30%,压比从1.10提高到1.43,而叶片数从2片增加到4片时,压力提高了17% ~ 23%,压比从1.18增加到1.40。轮尖比为0.33,叶片角为30°,4片叶片的优化配置使轮毂附近的低压区域减少了约28%,表明抗空化能力得到了提高。利用子午流线和静压轮廓的流动可视化证实了优化设计的平滑加速和减少再循环。这些发现为诱导体几何优化提供了定量的见解,并为提高吸力和设计高性能离心泵提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书