Strategic Sustainability Initiatives and the Circular Economy: Insights From Firm-Level Targets, Board Dynamics, Stakeholder Pressure, and Digital Transformation

IF 4.2 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility Pub Date : 2026-03-23 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1111/beer.12818
Abednego Osei, Andrew Osei Agyemang, Joana Cobbinah
{"title":"Strategic Sustainability Initiatives and the Circular Economy: Insights From Firm-Level Targets, Board Dynamics, Stakeholder Pressure, and Digital Transformation","authors":"Abednego Osei,&nbsp;Andrew Osei Agyemang,&nbsp;Joana Cobbinah","doi":"10.1111/beer.12818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study contributes to the literature on sustainability, innovation, and corporate governance by advancing the understanding of the circular economy (CE) through an analysis of firm-level sustainability targets, board dynamics, stakeholder pressure, and digital transformation within firms in the MENA region. Drawing on resource-based, stakeholder, and innovation theories, we developed models linking sustainability targets and board dynamics to CE performance, with stakeholder pressure as a mediator and digital transformation as a moderator. We tested these hypotheses using data from 647 publicly listed manufacturing companies in the MENA region, spanning 2010–2022. By employing robust econometric techniques, we found strong evidence that embedding sustainability incentives in executive compensation and implementing structured sustainability initiatives significantly enhance CE performance. Additionally, effective boardroom characteristics positively influence CE adoption, while stakeholder pressure mediates the relationship between sustainability targets, board dynamics, and CE performance. Similarly, digital transformation reinforces sustainability governance, strengthening the role of board dynamics and sustainability targets in driving CE adoption. Finally, our findings highlight regional and performance-based differences in how MENA firms implement sustainability targets and board dynamics to influence CE outcomes. The results remain consistent after multiple robustness tests, including rolling window analysis, sensitivity analysis, and endogeneity tests. The findings emphasize the need for incentive-driven policies that integrate CE principles into corporate governance, promote sustainability-linked executive compensation, enhance board diversity, and support digital transformation initiatives. Policymakers should also standardize CE reporting frameworks to align with global sustainability commitments, ensuring transparency, accountability, and long-term sustainability adoption.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"35 2","pages":"764-789"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study contributes to the literature on sustainability, innovation, and corporate governance by advancing the understanding of the circular economy (CE) through an analysis of firm-level sustainability targets, board dynamics, stakeholder pressure, and digital transformation within firms in the MENA region. Drawing on resource-based, stakeholder, and innovation theories, we developed models linking sustainability targets and board dynamics to CE performance, with stakeholder pressure as a mediator and digital transformation as a moderator. We tested these hypotheses using data from 647 publicly listed manufacturing companies in the MENA region, spanning 2010–2022. By employing robust econometric techniques, we found strong evidence that embedding sustainability incentives in executive compensation and implementing structured sustainability initiatives significantly enhance CE performance. Additionally, effective boardroom characteristics positively influence CE adoption, while stakeholder pressure mediates the relationship between sustainability targets, board dynamics, and CE performance. Similarly, digital transformation reinforces sustainability governance, strengthening the role of board dynamics and sustainability targets in driving CE adoption. Finally, our findings highlight regional and performance-based differences in how MENA firms implement sustainability targets and board dynamics to influence CE outcomes. The results remain consistent after multiple robustness tests, including rolling window analysis, sensitivity analysis, and endogeneity tests. The findings emphasize the need for incentive-driven policies that integrate CE principles into corporate governance, promote sustainability-linked executive compensation, enhance board diversity, and support digital transformation initiatives. Policymakers should also standardize CE reporting frameworks to align with global sustainability commitments, ensuring transparency, accountability, and long-term sustainability adoption.

战略可持续发展倡议和循环经济:来自公司层面目标、董事会动态、利益相关者压力和数字化转型的见解
本研究通过分析中东和北非地区公司层面的可持续发展目标、董事会动态、利益相关者压力和数字化转型,促进了对循环经济(CE)的理解,从而为可持续发展、创新和公司治理方面的文献做出了贡献。利用资源基础理论、利益相关者理论和创新理论,我们开发了将可持续发展目标和董事会动态与环境绩效联系起来的模型,其中利益相关者压力是中介,数字化转型是调节因素。我们使用2010-2022年间中东和北非地区647家上市制造业公司的数据对这些假设进行了检验。通过采用稳健的计量经济学技术,我们发现强有力的证据表明,在高管薪酬中嵌入可持续发展激励措施,并实施结构化的可持续发展举措,显著提高了企业绩效。此外,有效的董事会特征正向影响可持续发展目标、董事会动态和环保绩效之间的关系,而利益相关者压力则起到中介作用。同样,数字化转型加强了可持续性治理,加强了董事会动态和可持续发展目标在推动环保企业采用方面的作用。最后,我们的研究结果强调了中东和北非地区公司在实施可持续发展目标和董事会动态以影响CE结果方面的区域差异和基于绩效的差异。经过多次稳健性检验,包括滚动窗分析、敏感性分析和内生性检验,结果保持一致。研究结果强调,有必要制定激励驱动型政策,将环保原则纳入公司治理,促进与可持续发展挂钩的高管薪酬,增强董事会多样性,并支持数字化转型举措。政策制定者还应使环境污染报告框架标准化,以与全球可持续发展承诺保持一致,确保透明度、问责制和长期可持续发展的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书