{"title":"Cugoano on Responsibility and Oppression","authors":"Iziah C Topete","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article contributes to the growing literature on the West African Quobna Ottobah Cugoano by reconstructing his concept of responsibility from <i>Thoughts and Sentiments on the Evil and Wicked Traffic of the Slavery and Commerce of the Human Species</i>, first published in London in July 1787. In this text, Cugoano drew the thesis that every individual in the British empire was responsible for the oppression of Africans. Objections to the plausibility of his claim are raised. By contextualizing the argument in eighteenth-century abolitionist thought, I clarify that his thesis is not grounded in causation but in judgment. I develop a <i>passive judgment</i> principle that animates his argument: to judge oppression <i>qua</i> oppression without intervening is to be complicit in it. He applies this principle to different instances, particularly the case of slavery's legal toleration in the British empire.</p>","PeriodicalId":46958,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"34 1","pages":"17-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.13084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article contributes to the growing literature on the West African Quobna Ottobah Cugoano by reconstructing his concept of responsibility from Thoughts and Sentiments on the Evil and Wicked Traffic of the Slavery and Commerce of the Human Species, first published in London in July 1787. In this text, Cugoano drew the thesis that every individual in the British empire was responsible for the oppression of Africans. Objections to the plausibility of his claim are raised. By contextualizing the argument in eighteenth-century abolitionist thought, I clarify that his thesis is not grounded in causation but in judgment. I develop a passive judgment principle that animates his argument: to judge oppression qua oppression without intervening is to be complicit in it. He applies this principle to different instances, particularly the case of slavery's legal toleration in the British empire.
期刊介绍:
''Founded by Mark Sacks in 1993, the European Journal of Philosophy has come to occupy a distinctive and highly valued place amongst the philosophical journals. The aim of EJP has been to bring together the best work from those working within the "analytic" and "continental" traditions, and to encourage connections between them, without diluting their respective priorities and concerns. This has enabled EJP to publish a wide range of material of the highest standard from philosophers across the world, reflecting the best thinking from a variety of philosophical perspectives, in a way that is accessible to all of them.''