Effect of Salt Addition in Porcine Plasma Protein-based Bioplastics as a Strategy To Obtain Superabsorbent Materials

IF 5 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Stefano Liotino, Stefania Cometa, Manuel Félix, Antonio Guerrero, Carlos Bengoechea, Elvira De Giglio
{"title":"Effect of Salt Addition in Porcine Plasma Protein-based Bioplastics as a Strategy To Obtain Superabsorbent Materials","authors":"Stefano Liotino,&nbsp;Stefania Cometa,&nbsp;Manuel Félix,&nbsp;Antonio Guerrero,&nbsp;Carlos Bengoechea,&nbsp;Elvira De Giglio","doi":"10.1007/s10924-025-03718-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, there has been a growing interest in high-porosity materials, such as polyurethane foams, used alone or in combination with other polymers, for applications in various fields, including hygienic-sanitary, biomedical, agricultural, and food packaging. To replace non-biodegradable plastic materials with new-generation bioplastics that meet consumer expectations in terms of both performance and eco-sustainability, this work developed and tested porous composite materials based on porcine plasma protein (PPP), a biowaste from the meat industry. The bioplastics were obtained by blending PPP with a plasticizer (i.e., glycerol), keeping a PPP/glycerol ratio equal to 1, and then injection moulding was employed using two different mould temperatures (60 and 120 °C). In particular, the impact of using three different salts (i.e., ammonium bicarbonate, sodium bicarbonate, and sodium carbonate) at 5 w/w% content on the absorption performances of the bioplastics was evaluated. Chemical-physical characterizations, mechanical and rheological analyses, as well as liquid absorption tests (in different media and/or conditions) on all the obtained bioplastics were carried out. The bioplastic including sodium carbonate moulded at 60 °C gave the best material in terms of water uptake values at 24 h (3000 ± 200%), reaching similar values to those of a commercially available foam employed in female hygienic napkins (2800 ± 100%). Water uptake values ranging from 400 to 2250% were obtained for the rest of the PPP-based systems. In saline solution, tests carried out following the official protocols supplied encouraging results (i.e., FSC = 10.6 ± 0.4 g/g, CRC = 2.8 ± 0.7 g/g, AUL = 3.0 ± 0.1 g/g, and rewet = 0.86 ± 0.06 g), although there is still a gap between commercially available products and proposed bioplastics in terms of CRC and AUL. SEM evaluation confirmed this similarity as this system displayed a complex microstructure, characterized by a porous and interconnected structure. Therefore, the obtained results represent a significant step towards creating eco-friendly superabsorbent materials that meet industrial requirements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Polymers and the Environment","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Polymers and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10924-025-03718-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in high-porosity materials, such as polyurethane foams, used alone or in combination with other polymers, for applications in various fields, including hygienic-sanitary, biomedical, agricultural, and food packaging. To replace non-biodegradable plastic materials with new-generation bioplastics that meet consumer expectations in terms of both performance and eco-sustainability, this work developed and tested porous composite materials based on porcine plasma protein (PPP), a biowaste from the meat industry. The bioplastics were obtained by blending PPP with a plasticizer (i.e., glycerol), keeping a PPP/glycerol ratio equal to 1, and then injection moulding was employed using two different mould temperatures (60 and 120 °C). In particular, the impact of using three different salts (i.e., ammonium bicarbonate, sodium bicarbonate, and sodium carbonate) at 5 w/w% content on the absorption performances of the bioplastics was evaluated. Chemical-physical characterizations, mechanical and rheological analyses, as well as liquid absorption tests (in different media and/or conditions) on all the obtained bioplastics were carried out. The bioplastic including sodium carbonate moulded at 60 °C gave the best material in terms of water uptake values at 24 h (3000 ± 200%), reaching similar values to those of a commercially available foam employed in female hygienic napkins (2800 ± 100%). Water uptake values ranging from 400 to 2250% were obtained for the rest of the PPP-based systems. In saline solution, tests carried out following the official protocols supplied encouraging results (i.e., FSC = 10.6 ± 0.4 g/g, CRC = 2.8 ± 0.7 g/g, AUL = 3.0 ± 0.1 g/g, and rewet = 0.86 ± 0.06 g), although there is still a gap between commercially available products and proposed bioplastics in terms of CRC and AUL. SEM evaluation confirmed this similarity as this system displayed a complex microstructure, characterized by a porous and interconnected structure. Therefore, the obtained results represent a significant step towards creating eco-friendly superabsorbent materials that meet industrial requirements.

添加盐对猪血浆蛋白基生物塑料获得高吸水性材料的影响
近年来,人们对高孔隙率材料越来越感兴趣,如聚氨酯泡沫,单独使用或与其他聚合物结合使用,用于各种领域,包括卫生,生物医学,农业和食品包装。为了用新一代生物塑料取代不可生物降解的塑料材料,以满足消费者在性能和生态可持续性方面的期望,这项工作开发并测试了基于猪血浆蛋白(PPP)的多孔复合材料,这是一种来自肉类行业的生物废物。通过将PPP与增塑剂(即甘油)混合,保持PPP/甘油的比例等于1,获得生物塑料,然后在两种不同的模具温度(60和120℃)下进行注射成型。特别地,评估了使用5 w/w%含量的三种不同的盐(即碳酸氢铵、碳酸氢钠和碳酸钠)对生物塑料吸收性能的影响。对所有获得的生物塑料进行了化学物理表征、机械和流变分析以及液体吸收测试(在不同介质和/或条件下)。含碳酸钠的生物塑料在60°C下成型,在24小时的吸水值(3000±200%)方面提供了最好的材料,达到与商业上用于女性卫生巾的泡沫相似的值(2800±100%)。其余以ppp为基础的系统的吸水值在400 - 2250%之间。在盐水溶液中,按照官方方案进行的测试提供了令人鼓舞的结果(即,FSC = 10.6±0.4 g/g, CRC = 2.8±0.7 g/g, AUL = 3.0±0.1 g/g, rewet = 0.86±0.06 g),尽管在CRC和AUL方面,商业产品与拟议的生物塑料之间仍存在差距。SEM评价证实了这种相似性,因为该体系显示出复杂的微观结构,其特征是多孔和相互连接的结构。因此,获得的结果代表了朝着创造符合工业要求的环保高吸水性材料迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Polymers and the Environment
Journal of Polymers and the Environment 工程技术-高分子科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Polymers and the Environment fills the need for an international forum in this diverse and rapidly expanding field. The journal serves a crucial role for the publication of information from a wide range of disciplines and is a central outlet for the publication of high-quality peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and short communications. The journal is intentionally interdisciplinary in regard to contributions and covers the following subjects - polymers, environmentally degradable polymers, and degradation pathways: biological, photochemical, oxidative and hydrolytic; new environmental materials: derived by chemical and biosynthetic routes; environmental blends and composites; developments in processing and reactive processing of environmental polymers; characterization of environmental materials: mechanical, physical, thermal, rheological, morphological, and others; recyclable polymers and plastics recycling environmental testing: in-laboratory simulations, outdoor exposures, and standardization of methodologies; environmental fate: end products and intermediates of biodegradation; microbiology and enzymology of polymer biodegradation; solid-waste management and public legislation specific to environmental polymers; and other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书