Saifullah Arabzai, Mehtab Ahmad, Md Sajid, Kong Fah Tee
{"title":"Advanced damping devices for tall buildings under seismic and wind loads: A state-of-the-art review","authors":"Saifullah Arabzai, Mehtab Ahmad, Md Sajid, Kong Fah Tee","doi":"10.1007/s44150-026-00192-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Rapid urbanization has produced taller, more slender buildings that are increasingly vulnerable to wind and earthquake-induced vibrations. This review synthesizes advances in passive, semi-active, and hybrid damping technologies for tall building applications, with emphasis on tuned mass dampers (TMDs), multiple TMDs (MTMDs), tuned liquid dampers (TLDs), inerter-based devices (e.g., TMDI/TMDFI), viscous and viscoelastic dampers, and magnetorheological (MR) systems. A systematic search (2000–2025; Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar) and staged screening were used to extract device principles, optimization strategies, placement and configuration practices, and comparative performance under seismic versus wind actions. Unlike existing review studies that typically focus on individual device classes or single hazard scenarios, this review provides an integrated, multi-hazard comparison across a broad spectrum of damping technologies. Comparative evaluation is conducted using consistently reported performance criteria, including inter-story drift, acceleration and displacement reduction, robustness to detuning, and practical implementation considerations. The reviewed literature generally reports acceleration and displacement reductions in the range of 40–60% for well-tuned passive systems, depending on hazard type, tuning strategy, and structural configuration and inter-story drifts by up to 65%, while MTMDs and inerter-based variants broaden control bandwidth and improve detuning robustness with smaller physical masses. Viscous dampers excel under short-duration, high-velocity seismic demands, whereas viscoelastic devices perform more effectively for long-duration wind-induced serviceability, with hybrid systems leveraging the advantages of both. Semi-active solutions, such as MR dampers and smart variable-stiffness TMDs, enable adaptive retuning with low power demand, improving reliability under changing structural properties, soil structure interaction, and multi-hazard conditions. The main contribution of this review lies in synthesizing reported performance trends, optimization strategies, and implementation considerations across damping device families and hazard types, providing practice-ready guidance for tall building vibration control. Identified research gaps include probabilistic and uncertainty-aware design, stroke-constrained optimization, long-term monitoring and digital twin integration, and standardized multi-hazard verification protocols, outlining future directions for resilient and economical vibration mitigation in tall buildings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-026-00192-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid urbanization has produced taller, more slender buildings that are increasingly vulnerable to wind and earthquake-induced vibrations. This review synthesizes advances in passive, semi-active, and hybrid damping technologies for tall building applications, with emphasis on tuned mass dampers (TMDs), multiple TMDs (MTMDs), tuned liquid dampers (TLDs), inerter-based devices (e.g., TMDI/TMDFI), viscous and viscoelastic dampers, and magnetorheological (MR) systems. A systematic search (2000–2025; Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar) and staged screening were used to extract device principles, optimization strategies, placement and configuration practices, and comparative performance under seismic versus wind actions. Unlike existing review studies that typically focus on individual device classes or single hazard scenarios, this review provides an integrated, multi-hazard comparison across a broad spectrum of damping technologies. Comparative evaluation is conducted using consistently reported performance criteria, including inter-story drift, acceleration and displacement reduction, robustness to detuning, and practical implementation considerations. The reviewed literature generally reports acceleration and displacement reductions in the range of 40–60% for well-tuned passive systems, depending on hazard type, tuning strategy, and structural configuration and inter-story drifts by up to 65%, while MTMDs and inerter-based variants broaden control bandwidth and improve detuning robustness with smaller physical masses. Viscous dampers excel under short-duration, high-velocity seismic demands, whereas viscoelastic devices perform more effectively for long-duration wind-induced serviceability, with hybrid systems leveraging the advantages of both. Semi-active solutions, such as MR dampers and smart variable-stiffness TMDs, enable adaptive retuning with low power demand, improving reliability under changing structural properties, soil structure interaction, and multi-hazard conditions. The main contribution of this review lies in synthesizing reported performance trends, optimization strategies, and implementation considerations across damping device families and hazard types, providing practice-ready guidance for tall building vibration control. Identified research gaps include probabilistic and uncertainty-aware design, stroke-constrained optimization, long-term monitoring and digital twin integration, and standardized multi-hazard verification protocols, outlining future directions for resilient and economical vibration mitigation in tall buildings.
快速的城市化产生了更高、更细的建筑,这些建筑越来越容易受到风和地震引起的振动的影响。本文综述了高层建筑应用中被动、半主动和混合阻尼技术的进展,重点介绍了调谐质量阻尼器(TMDs)、多调谐质量阻尼器(MTMDs)、调谐液体阻尼器(tld)、基于interter的装置(如TMDI/TMDFI)、粘性和粘弹性阻尼器以及磁流变(MR)系统。系统搜索(2000-2025;Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect,谷歌Scholar)和分阶段筛选用于提取设备原理,优化策略,放置和配置实践,以及在地震和风力作用下的比较性能。与现有的综述研究不同,这些综述通常侧重于单个设备类别或单一危险情况,而本综述提供了广泛的阻尼技术的综合、多危险比较。使用一致报告的性能标准进行比较评估,包括层间漂移、加速度和位移减少、失谐鲁棒性和实际实施考虑。所回顾的文献通常报道,根据危险类型、调谐策略和结构配置,经过良好调谐的被动系统的加速度和位移减少幅度在40-60%之间,层间漂移可达65%,而mtmd和基于internet的变体拓宽了控制带宽,并在较小的物理质量下提高了失谐鲁棒性。粘性阻尼器在短时间、高速的地震需求下表现出色,而粘弹性阻尼器在长时间的风力作用下表现更有效,混合系统利用了两者的优势。半主动解决方案,如MR阻尼器和智能变刚度tmd,可以在低功率需求下实现自适应返回,提高结构特性变化、土壤结构相互作用和多灾害条件下的可靠性。本综述的主要贡献在于综合了已报道的性能趋势、优化策略以及跨阻尼装置系列和危害类型的实施考虑,为高层建筑振动控制提供了实践指导。确定的研究差距包括概率和不确定性感知设计、行程约束优化、长期监测和数字孪生集成,以及标准化的多危害验证协议,概述了高层建筑弹性和经济振动缓解的未来方向。