Mechanisms and mitigation effects of oblique seam linings in fault-crossing tunnels: combined experimental and numerical evidence under normal faulting

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Qi Wang, Yan Zhao, Yiying Chen, Ping Geng, Dingwei He, Guoliang Li, Jing Zhang, Huoming Shen
{"title":"Mechanisms and mitigation effects of oblique seam linings in fault-crossing tunnels: combined experimental and numerical evidence under normal faulting","authors":"Qi Wang,&nbsp;Yan Zhao,&nbsp;Yiying Chen,&nbsp;Ping Geng,&nbsp;Dingwei He,&nbsp;Guoliang Li,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Huoming Shen","doi":"10.1007/s11440-026-02954-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To evaluate the influence of sectional seam configurations (normal vs. oblique) on the fault-crossing performance of tunnels, this study integrates 1:40 scale model tests with three-dimensional elasto-plastic finite element simulations. The mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of tunnels subjected to normal fault dislocation were comprehensively examined through deformation patterns, contact earth pressure, strain distribution, internal force characteristics, and failure modes. Experimental results indicate that tunnels with normal seams undergo severe longitudinal tensile-flexural failure and shear-induced spalling near the fault rupture surface, accompanied by dense cracking. In contrast, oblique seam tunnels demonstrate enhanced structural flexibility, reduced crack density, and absence of large-scale spalling, reflecting improved adaptability to fault displacement. Peak longitudinal strain was reduced by up to 80% at the crown exterior and 13% at the invert exterior, while earth pressure at the crown and invert decreased by 70 and 20%, respectively. To validate these findings, numerical simulations employing the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model were conducted. The results exhibited consistent damage evolution trends, with oblique seams effectively redistributing tensile stress and mitigating compressive damage. Furthermore, global damage indices quantitatively confirmed the superior fortification performance of oblique seam linings. This integrated experimental–numerical approach offers robust evidence and a scientific basis for the seismic design and resilience enhancement of tunnels intersecting normal faults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"21 2","pages":"1119 - 1146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-026-02954-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of sectional seam configurations (normal vs. oblique) on the fault-crossing performance of tunnels, this study integrates 1:40 scale model tests with three-dimensional elasto-plastic finite element simulations. The mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of tunnels subjected to normal fault dislocation were comprehensively examined through deformation patterns, contact earth pressure, strain distribution, internal force characteristics, and failure modes. Experimental results indicate that tunnels with normal seams undergo severe longitudinal tensile-flexural failure and shear-induced spalling near the fault rupture surface, accompanied by dense cracking. In contrast, oblique seam tunnels demonstrate enhanced structural flexibility, reduced crack density, and absence of large-scale spalling, reflecting improved adaptability to fault displacement. Peak longitudinal strain was reduced by up to 80% at the crown exterior and 13% at the invert exterior, while earth pressure at the crown and invert decreased by 70 and 20%, respectively. To validate these findings, numerical simulations employing the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model were conducted. The results exhibited consistent damage evolution trends, with oblique seams effectively redistributing tensile stress and mitigating compressive damage. Furthermore, global damage indices quantitatively confirmed the superior fortification performance of oblique seam linings. This integrated experimental–numerical approach offers robust evidence and a scientific basis for the seismic design and resilience enhancement of tunnels intersecting normal faults.

跨断隧道斜斜煤层衬砌的机理及缓解效果:正断层作用下的实验与数值结合证据
为了评估断面煤层形态(正、斜)对隧道断层穿越性能的影响,本研究将1:40比例模型试验与三维弹塑性有限元模拟相结合。通过变形模式、接触土压力、应变分布、内力特征和破坏模式,全面研究了正断层位错作用下隧道的力学行为和破坏机制。试验结果表明,正常煤层隧道在断层破裂面附近发生严重的纵向拉弯破坏和剪切剥落,并伴有密集开裂。斜缝隧道结构柔韧性增强,裂缝密度减小,无大面积剥落,对断层位移的适应性增强。结果表明,拱顶外侧的纵向应变峰值降低了80%,仰拱外侧的纵向应变峰值降低了13%,而拱顶和仰拱处的土压力分别降低了70%和20%。为了验证这些发现,采用混凝土损伤塑性(CDP)模型进行了数值模拟。结果表明,斜缝损伤演化趋势一致,斜缝有效地重新分配拉应力,减轻压缩损伤。整体损伤指标定量证实了斜缝衬砌具有较好的加固性能。该方法为与正断层相交的隧道抗震设计和提高回弹能力提供了有力的依据和科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书