Chemistry experiences that matter: understanding self-identified influential experiences at different academic stages

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Devin Pontigon and Vicente Talanquer
{"title":"Chemistry experiences that matter: understanding self-identified influential experiences at different academic stages","authors":"Devin Pontigon and Vicente Talanquer","doi":"10.1039/D5RP00465A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This exploratory qualitative study examines the chemistry-related experiences that individuals at different academic stages describe as influential to their current academic and professional positioning within chemistry. Rather than eliciting predefined categories of experiences, participants were invited to share the moments, interactions, and contexts they deemed important, which were primarily situated within chemistry-related settings. Using these participant-selected narratives as the primary data source, transcripts were analyzed with a coding framework that characterized each experience by affective tone (positive, negative, neutral), role positioning (being a student or being a professional), and emergent experience type (curricular, co-curricular, extracurricular). Analysis revealed patterned differences in how participants described influential chemistry experiences across contexts, affective framings, and role positioning. Curricular experiences were more prominently described using frustration, challenge, or neutrality and were often framed through a student role, whereas co-curricular experiences, such as research and internships, were associated with mixed affective tones of uncertainty and empowerment and relatively more professional positioning. Extracurricular experiences were primarily described as sites of social connection and emotional support, particularly in early undergraduate stages, supporting persistence within coursework rather than disciplinary contribution. Taken together, these analyses trace how affective, contextual, and positional dimensions come together in the chemistry experiences participants interpreted as significant. By comparing participants within different academic stages, the study examines how chemistry-related experiences are framed as influential and highlight the importance of designing learning environments that account for differences in how participants engage with, frame, and prioritize chemistry-related experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 2","pages":" 864-880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/rp/d5rp00465a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/rp/d5rp00465a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory qualitative study examines the chemistry-related experiences that individuals at different academic stages describe as influential to their current academic and professional positioning within chemistry. Rather than eliciting predefined categories of experiences, participants were invited to share the moments, interactions, and contexts they deemed important, which were primarily situated within chemistry-related settings. Using these participant-selected narratives as the primary data source, transcripts were analyzed with a coding framework that characterized each experience by affective tone (positive, negative, neutral), role positioning (being a student or being a professional), and emergent experience type (curricular, co-curricular, extracurricular). Analysis revealed patterned differences in how participants described influential chemistry experiences across contexts, affective framings, and role positioning. Curricular experiences were more prominently described using frustration, challenge, or neutrality and were often framed through a student role, whereas co-curricular experiences, such as research and internships, were associated with mixed affective tones of uncertainty and empowerment and relatively more professional positioning. Extracurricular experiences were primarily described as sites of social connection and emotional support, particularly in early undergraduate stages, supporting persistence within coursework rather than disciplinary contribution. Taken together, these analyses trace how affective, contextual, and positional dimensions come together in the chemistry experiences participants interpreted as significant. By comparing participants within different academic stages, the study examines how chemistry-related experiences are framed as influential and highlight the importance of designing learning environments that account for differences in how participants engage with, frame, and prioritize chemistry-related experiences.

重要的化学经历:了解不同学术阶段自我认定的有影响力的经历
这项探索性质的研究考察了不同学术阶段的个人描述的对他们目前在化学领域的学术和专业定位有影响的化学相关经历。参与者被邀请分享他们认为重要的时刻、互动和背景,而不是引出预定义的体验类别,这些主要位于与化学相关的设置中。使用这些参与者选择的叙述作为主要数据源,使用编码框架对记录进行分析,该编码框架根据情感基调(积极,消极,中性),角色定位(作为学生或专业人员)以及突发体验类型(课程,联合课程,课外)来描述每种体验。分析揭示了参与者在不同情境、情感框架和角色定位中如何描述有影响的化学经历的模式差异。课程体验更多地使用挫折、挑战或中立来描述,并且通常通过学生角色来框架,而课外体验,如研究和实习,则与不确定和授权的混合情感色调以及相对更专业的定位有关。课外经历主要被描述为社会联系和情感支持的场所,特别是在本科早期阶段,支持课程的坚持而不是学科贡献。综上所述,这些分析追踪了情感、情境和位置维度是如何在参与者认为重要的化学体验中结合在一起的。通过比较不同学术阶段的参与者,该研究考察了与化学相关的经验是如何被构建为有影响力的,并强调了设计学习环境的重要性,该环境考虑了参与者如何参与、构建和优先考虑化学相关经验的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书