Mapping Collaborative Practices Between Occupational Therapists and Peer Supporters in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Michio Maruta, Akira Nakashima, Kikuo Eguchi, Gwanghee Han, Daiki Yamazono, Tomofusa Kawano, Miki Yamashita, Yuri Onomichi, Akira Imamura, Suguru Shimokihara, Goro Tanaka
{"title":"Mapping Collaborative Practices Between Occupational Therapists and Peer Supporters in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Michio Maruta, Akira Nakashima, Kikuo Eguchi, Gwanghee Han, Daiki Yamazono, Tomofusa Kawano, Miki Yamashita, Yuri Onomichi, Akira Imamura, Suguru Shimokihara, Goro Tanaka","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2026.051394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational therapists and peer supporters share recovery-oriented values and increasingly collaborate in mental health settings. However, the structure and implementation of this collaboration remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map the literature on collaborative practices between occupational therapists and peer supporters in mental health, focusing on structures, roles, perceived benefits, and challenges.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were searched in January 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>This review followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). By using the Participants, Concept, and Context framework, the authors included studies that involved people with mental health conditions, described collaborative efforts between occupational therapists and peer supporters, and were situated in mental health settings. A brief stakeholder consultation was conducted to enhance the practical relevance of the findings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This study included 11 studies published between 2001 and 2023. Three collaboration models were identified: cofacilitated, peer supporter-led with occupational therapist support, and occupational therapist-led with peer supporter involvement. Occupational therapists contributed clinical, structural, and contextual expertise, whereas peer supporters provided lived experiences, emotional support, and recovery-oriented perspectives. The reported benefits included improved occupational engagement, quality of life, and peer supporter development. Challenges included role ambiguity, boundary issues, and limited organizational support. Stakeholders broadly agreed with these findings and highlighted their relevance to collaborative practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Occupational therapists play an important collaborative role in enabling peer supporters to apply experiential knowledge in recovery-oriented practice. Clarifying roles, fostering mutual understanding, and building supportive structures are essential. Plain-Language Summary: This study explored how occupational therapists and peer supporters collaborate in mental health services. Peer supporters are individuals with lived experiences of mental health challenges who support others on their recovery journeys. Occupational therapists are health professionals who help individuals participate in meaningful daily activities and regain structure and identity. When occupational therapists and peer supporters collaborate, they combine clinical and experiential knowledge to support recovery in complementary ways. In this review, we identified several collaboration models including coleading group sessions, peer supporter-led programs with occupational therapist support, and occupational therapist-led programs with peer supporter involvement. This review found that such partnerships can increase confidence, promote community participation, improve daily life, and foster personal growth for service users and peer supporters. Challenges including unclear roles, lack of supervision for peer supporters, and limited organizational support were also reported. Gaining a better understanding of these collaborations may help improve recovery-oriented mental health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2026.051394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Occupational therapists and peer supporters share recovery-oriented values and increasingly collaborate in mental health settings. However, the structure and implementation of this collaboration remain unclear.

Objective: To map the literature on collaborative practices between occupational therapists and peer supporters in mental health, focusing on structures, roles, perceived benefits, and challenges.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were searched in January 2025.

Study selection and data extraction: This review followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). By using the Participants, Concept, and Context framework, the authors included studies that involved people with mental health conditions, described collaborative efforts between occupational therapists and peer supporters, and were situated in mental health settings. A brief stakeholder consultation was conducted to enhance the practical relevance of the findings.

Findings: This study included 11 studies published between 2001 and 2023. Three collaboration models were identified: cofacilitated, peer supporter-led with occupational therapist support, and occupational therapist-led with peer supporter involvement. Occupational therapists contributed clinical, structural, and contextual expertise, whereas peer supporters provided lived experiences, emotional support, and recovery-oriented perspectives. The reported benefits included improved occupational engagement, quality of life, and peer supporter development. Challenges included role ambiguity, boundary issues, and limited organizational support. Stakeholders broadly agreed with these findings and highlighted their relevance to collaborative practice.

Conclusions and relevance: Occupational therapists play an important collaborative role in enabling peer supporters to apply experiential knowledge in recovery-oriented practice. Clarifying roles, fostering mutual understanding, and building supportive structures are essential. Plain-Language Summary: This study explored how occupational therapists and peer supporters collaborate in mental health services. Peer supporters are individuals with lived experiences of mental health challenges who support others on their recovery journeys. Occupational therapists are health professionals who help individuals participate in meaningful daily activities and regain structure and identity. When occupational therapists and peer supporters collaborate, they combine clinical and experiential knowledge to support recovery in complementary ways. In this review, we identified several collaboration models including coleading group sessions, peer supporter-led programs with occupational therapist support, and occupational therapist-led programs with peer supporter involvement. This review found that such partnerships can increase confidence, promote community participation, improve daily life, and foster personal growth for service users and peer supporters. Challenges including unclear roles, lack of supervision for peer supporters, and limited organizational support were also reported. Gaining a better understanding of these collaborations may help improve recovery-oriented mental health services.

心理健康中职业治疗师和同伴支持者之间的协作实践:范围审查。
重要性:职业治疗师和同伴支持者分享以康复为导向的价值观,并在心理健康环境中越来越多地合作。然而,这种合作的结构和实现仍然不清楚。目的:梳理职业治疗师和同伴支持者在心理健康领域的合作实践,重点关注其结构、角色、感知利益和挑战。数据来源:PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest数据库于2025年1月检索。研究选择和数据提取:本综述遵循Arksey和O'Malley(2005)的方法框架。通过使用参与者、概念和背景框架,作者纳入了涉及心理健康状况的人的研究,描述了职业治疗师和同伴支持者之间的合作努力,并位于心理健康环境中。进行了一次简短的利益相关者咨询,以加强调查结果的实际相关性。研究结果:该研究包括2001年至2023年间发表的11项研究。确定了三种协作模式:协同促进、同伴支持主导、职业治疗师支持和职业治疗师主导、同伴支持参与。职业治疗师贡献了临床、结构和情境方面的专业知识,而同伴支持者则提供了生活经历、情感支持和以康复为导向的观点。报告的好处包括提高职业参与度、生活质量和同伴支持者的发展。挑战包括角色模糊、边界问题和有限的组织支持。利益相关者广泛同意这些发现,并强调了它们与协作实践的相关性。结论和相关性:职业治疗师在使同伴支持者在以康复为导向的实践中应用经验知识方面发挥着重要的协作作用。明确角色、促进相互理解和建立支持性结构是必不可少的。摘要:本研究探讨职业治疗师和同伴支持者如何在心理健康服务中合作。同伴支持者是有精神健康挑战的生活经历的个人,他们支持其他人的康复之旅。职业治疗师是帮助个人参与有意义的日常活动并重新获得结构和身份的健康专业人士。当职业治疗师和同伴支持者合作时,他们将临床和经验知识结合起来,以互补的方式支持康复。在这篇综述中,我们确定了几种合作模式,包括领导小组会议、同伴支持主导的有职业治疗师支持的项目,以及职业治疗师主导的有同伴支持参与的项目。本综述发现,这种伙伴关系可以增强信心,促进社区参与,改善日常生活,促进服务使用者和同伴支持者的个人成长。挑战包括不明确的角色,缺乏对同伴支持者的监督,以及有限的组织支持也被报道。更好地了解这些合作可能有助于改善以康复为导向的精神卫生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书