Transanal TME Video Quality on YouTube Versus WebSurg and the Development of a Procedure-Specific TaTME StepScore: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Alp Omer Canturk, Bahaeddin Umur Aka, Murat Coskun, Erhan Eroz, Adem Senturk, Emre Gonullu
{"title":"Transanal TME Video Quality on YouTube Versus WebSurg and the Development of a Procedure-Specific TaTME StepScore: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study.","authors":"Alp Omer Canturk, Bahaeddin Umur Aka, Murat Coskun, Erhan Eroz, Adem Senturk, Emre Gonullu","doi":"10.1177/10926429261435688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video-based learning is a central tool in minimally invasive surgical training; however, the educational/reporting quality and reliability of online content must be evaluated using objective criteria. This study aimed to compare the educational quality of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) videos published on YouTube and WebSurg and to test the validity of the TaTME-specific StepScore scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional content analysis was performed across platforms (total <i>n</i> = 30; YouTube = 15, WebSurg = 15). Videos were scored using Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) (0-18), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) (0-4), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) (5-25), and total mesorectal excision (TME) StepScore (14 steps, 0-28). Correlations were examined using Spearman's ρ with false discovery rate adjustment. Logistic regression and ROC/AUC were used to predict LAP-VEGaS ≥ 11 adequacy; the optimal threshold was determined using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total scores and LAP-VEGaS ≥ 11 rates were similar across platforms (YouTube 66.7%; WebSurg 60.0%). StepScore showed a strong correlation with LAPVEGaS and mDISCERN and a moderate correlation with JAMA. Each +1 point increase in StepScore increased the odds of a LAP-VEGaS score ≥ 11. According to the Youden analysis, a StepScore ≥ 15 was found to be the best threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Popular TaTME videos on YouTube and WebSurg appear similar in terms of educational/reporting quality. The procedure-specific StepScore is consistent with general quality measures and can predict LAP-VEGaS ≥ 11 adequacy with a practical ≥15 point target. Using StepScore for video assessment and as a step-by-step instructional checklist may contribute to improving TaTME training standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"433-439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261435688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Video-based learning is a central tool in minimally invasive surgical training; however, the educational/reporting quality and reliability of online content must be evaluated using objective criteria. This study aimed to compare the educational quality of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) videos published on YouTube and WebSurg and to test the validity of the TaTME-specific StepScore scale.

Methods: A cross-sectional content analysis was performed across platforms (total n = 30; YouTube = 15, WebSurg = 15). Videos were scored using Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) (0-18), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) (0-4), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) (5-25), and total mesorectal excision (TME) StepScore (14 steps, 0-28). Correlations were examined using Spearman's ρ with false discovery rate adjustment. Logistic regression and ROC/AUC were used to predict LAP-VEGaS ≥ 11 adequacy; the optimal threshold was determined using the Youden index.

Results: Total scores and LAP-VEGaS ≥ 11 rates were similar across platforms (YouTube 66.7%; WebSurg 60.0%). StepScore showed a strong correlation with LAPVEGaS and mDISCERN and a moderate correlation with JAMA. Each +1 point increase in StepScore increased the odds of a LAP-VEGaS score ≥ 11. According to the Youden analysis, a StepScore ≥ 15 was found to be the best threshold.

Conclusion: Popular TaTME videos on YouTube and WebSurg appear similar in terms of educational/reporting quality. The procedure-specific StepScore is consistent with general quality measures and can predict LAP-VEGaS ≥ 11 adequacy with a practical ≥15 point target. Using StepScore for video assessment and as a step-by-step instructional checklist may contribute to improving TaTME training standards.

YouTube上的经肛门TME视频质量与WebSurg的比较以及特定手术的TME StepScore的发展:一项横断面验证研究。
背景:基于视频的学习是微创手术培训的核心工具;然而,在线内容的教育/报道质量和可靠性必须使用客观标准进行评估。本研究旨在比较YouTube和WebSurg上发布的经肛门全肠系膜切除术(TaTME)视频的教育质量,并测试TaTME特定的StepScore量表的有效性。方法:跨平台进行横断面内容分析(总n = 30; YouTube = 15, WebSurg = 15)。视频评分采用腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)(0-18)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)(0-4)、改良的DISCERN (mDISCERN)(5-25)和直肠系膜切除术(TME) StepScore(14步,0-28)评分。使用Spearman ρ和假发现率调整来检验相关性。采用Logistic回归和ROC/AUC预测LAP-VEGaS≥11的充分性;利用约登指数确定最佳阈值。结果:不同平台的总评分和LAP-VEGaS≥11率相似(YouTube 66.7%, WebSurg 60.0%)。StepScore与LAPVEGaS和mDISCERN有很强的相关性,与JAMA有中等的相关性。StepScore每增加+1分,LAP-VEGaS评分≥11分的几率增加。根据Youden分析,StepScore≥15为最佳阈值。结论:YouTube和WebSurg上流行的TaTME视频在教育/报道质量方面相似。特定程序的StepScore与一般质量测量相一致,可以预测LAP-VEGaS≥11充分性,实际目标≥15分。使用StepScore进行视频评估,并作为逐步教学清单,可能有助于提高TaTME培训标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书