Evolution of tracheostomy practices after the COVID-19 pandemic: The fast lane in the post-COVID era.

Stephens Griner, Sabrina Elliott, Dimitrios Giannis, Camille Mai-Phuong Tran Quang, Kellyann Inniss, Andrew Miele, Martine A Louis, Nageswara R Mandava
{"title":"Evolution of tracheostomy practices after the COVID-19 pandemic: The fast lane in the post-COVID era.","authors":"Stephens Griner, Sabrina Elliott, Dimitrios Giannis, Camille Mai-Phuong Tran Quang, Kellyann Inniss, Andrew Miele, Martine A Louis, Nageswara R Mandava","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of tracheostomy in critically ill patients remains controversial. While early tracheostomy has been associated with reduced ventilator days and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), survival benefits remain inconsistent. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed intensive care unit workflows, airway management strategies, and interdisciplinary decision-making, potentially affecting tracheostomy practices even beyond the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate differences in tracheostomy timing, interdisciplinary consultation patterns, and clinical outcomes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in critically ill patients without active COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing tracheostomy at a community hospital in New York during two periods, pre-COVID (October 2012 to February 2020) and post-COVID (June 2022 to July 2024). Patients with active COVID-19 were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, time-based outcomes (including time to palliative care and surgical consultation, intubation-to-tracheostomy interval, and hospital LOS), and mortality at 2 months and 6 months were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 6-month mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 314 patients were included (246 pre-COVID, 68 post-COVID). Compared with the pre-COVID cohort, post-COVID patients had a significantly shorter time to palliative care consultation (3 days <i>vs</i> 7 days, <i>P</i> = 0.001), surgical consultation (9.5 days <i>vs</i> 15.0 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001), intubation-to-tracheostomy interval (11.0 days <i>vs</i> 15.5 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and hospital LOS (29.5 days <i>vs</i> 34.0 days, <i>P</i> = 0.033). Mortality at 2 months and 6 months did not differ significantly between cohorts. In multivariable analyses, age was the only factor independently associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The post-COVID era was associated with earlier interdisciplinary engagement and tracheostomy placement without improvement in short- or long-term mortality. These findings suggest a pandemic-driven change in airway management practices. The COVID-19 pandemic may have sensitized healthcare providers, leading to earlier involvement in tracheostomy decision-making, but long-term effects are yet to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"15 1","pages":"118274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13010894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of tracheostomy in critically ill patients remains controversial. While early tracheostomy has been associated with reduced ventilator days and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), survival benefits remain inconsistent. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed intensive care unit workflows, airway management strategies, and interdisciplinary decision-making, potentially affecting tracheostomy practices even beyond the pandemic.

Aim: To evaluate differences in tracheostomy timing, interdisciplinary consultation patterns, and clinical outcomes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in critically ill patients without active COVID-19.

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing tracheostomy at a community hospital in New York during two periods, pre-COVID (October 2012 to February 2020) and post-COVID (June 2022 to July 2024). Patients with active COVID-19 were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, time-based outcomes (including time to palliative care and surgical consultation, intubation-to-tracheostomy interval, and hospital LOS), and mortality at 2 months and 6 months were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 6-month mortality.

Results: A total of 314 patients were included (246 pre-COVID, 68 post-COVID). Compared with the pre-COVID cohort, post-COVID patients had a significantly shorter time to palliative care consultation (3 days vs 7 days, P = 0.001), surgical consultation (9.5 days vs 15.0 days, P < 0.001), intubation-to-tracheostomy interval (11.0 days vs 15.5 days, P < 0.001), and hospital LOS (29.5 days vs 34.0 days, P = 0.033). Mortality at 2 months and 6 months did not differ significantly between cohorts. In multivariable analyses, age was the only factor independently associated with mortality.

Conclusion: The post-COVID era was associated with earlier interdisciplinary engagement and tracheostomy placement without improvement in short- or long-term mortality. These findings suggest a pandemic-driven change in airway management practices. The COVID-19 pandemic may have sensitized healthcare providers, leading to earlier involvement in tracheostomy decision-making, but long-term effects are yet to be determined.

COVID-19大流行后气管切开术实践的演变:后covid时代的快车道。
背景:危重患者气管切开术的最佳时机仍然存在争议。虽然早期气管切开术与减少呼吸机天数和重症监护病房住院时间(LOS)有关,但生存益处仍不一致。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行改变了重症监护病房的工作流程、气道管理策略和跨学科决策,甚至可能在大流行之后影响气管切开术实践。目的:评价无活动性COVID-19的危重患者在COVID-19大流行前后气管切开术时机、跨学科会诊模式和临床结局的差异。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在纽约一家社区医院接受气管切开术的成年患者,他们分别在covid前(2012年10月至2020年2月)和covid后(2022年6月至2024年7月)两个时期。排除活性COVID-19患者。分析了人口统计学、合并症、基于时间的结果(包括到姑息治疗和手术会诊的时间、插管到气管切开的间隔时间和医院LOS)以及2个月和6个月的死亡率。采用多变量logistic回归确定与6个月死亡率相关的因素。结果:共纳入314例患者,其中冠前患者246例,冠后患者68例。与冠状病毒感染前相比,冠状病毒感染后患者进行缓和护理咨询的时间(3天比7天,P = 0.001)、手术咨询的时间(9.5天比15.0天,P < 0.001)、插管至气管造口间隔时间(11.0天比15.5天,P < 0.001)和医院LOS(29.5天比34.0天,P = 0.033)均显著缩短。2个月和6个月的死亡率在队列之间没有显著差异。在多变量分析中,年龄是唯一与死亡率独立相关的因素。结论:后covid时代与早期的跨学科参与和气管切开术放置有关,但短期或长期死亡率没有改善。这些发现表明,大流行导致气道管理实践发生了变化。COVID-19大流行可能使医疗保健提供者变得敏感,导致更早地参与气管切开术决策,但长期影响尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书