[Structure and challenges of meal provision systems by residential type in Japanese children's homes].

Hiroko Yoshida, Hiromi Ishida, Nobuko Murayama
{"title":"[Structure and challenges of meal provision systems by residential type in Japanese children's homes].","authors":"Hiroko Yoshida, Hiromi Ishida, Nobuko Murayama","doi":"10.11236/jph.25-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Children's homes provide a stable living environment for children without guardians or those who have experienced abuse. In Japan, there is a movement toward smaller-scale residential care facilities to realize \"a more homelike environment.\" This study considered meal provision within children's daily living spaces as a component of the home environment, aimed to classify children's homes into four residential types and examined the characteristics and challenges of their meal provision systems.Methods In January 2022, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted in 606 children's homes (500 responses, 82.5%). The analysis focused on directly operated facilities in which in-house staff were responsible for meal provision. Facilities were categorized into four residential types based on their configuration;(a) no unit,(b) large unit (>8 children), (c) small unit (≤8 children), and(d) branch-type small-scale group care (located outside the main facility).The classification considered meal preparation location and method (\"centralized cooking in one kitchen\" or \"unit-based cooking\") and occupations involved in meal provision. In facilities with unit kitchens, their use was categorized (\"cooked from all raw ingredients\" or \"partially cooked such as only rice\"), and compared by cooking style.Results Data from 420 directly operated facilities, (680 residential units; 99 no-units, 78 large units, 296 small units, and 207 branch-type units) were analyzed. Facilities that used centralized cooking were common in no-unit (100.0%) and large unit (83.3%) types, but less common in branch-type units (23.2%). Contrastingly, unit-based cooking was most prevalent in branch-type units (74.9%). Facilities using unit kitchens to cook all meals from raw ingredients were significantly more common among those using unit-based cooking than among those using centralized cooking (P < .001). Childcare workers and nursery teachers were significantly more involved in meal provision in branch-type units, whereas registered dietitians/dietitians were significantly less involved (P < .001).Conclusion Meal provision systems differed by residential type. Branch-type small-scale group care units, which provide a more home-like environment, relied heavily on childcare workers and nursery teachers for meal provision, whereas the involvement of dietitians is limited. These findings highlight the need for meal support systems that balance homelike environments with trained professional support.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.25-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Children's homes provide a stable living environment for children without guardians or those who have experienced abuse. In Japan, there is a movement toward smaller-scale residential care facilities to realize "a more homelike environment." This study considered meal provision within children's daily living spaces as a component of the home environment, aimed to classify children's homes into four residential types and examined the characteristics and challenges of their meal provision systems.Methods In January 2022, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted in 606 children's homes (500 responses, 82.5%). The analysis focused on directly operated facilities in which in-house staff were responsible for meal provision. Facilities were categorized into four residential types based on their configuration;(a) no unit,(b) large unit (>8 children), (c) small unit (≤8 children), and(d) branch-type small-scale group care (located outside the main facility).The classification considered meal preparation location and method ("centralized cooking in one kitchen" or "unit-based cooking") and occupations involved in meal provision. In facilities with unit kitchens, their use was categorized ("cooked from all raw ingredients" or "partially cooked such as only rice"), and compared by cooking style.Results Data from 420 directly operated facilities, (680 residential units; 99 no-units, 78 large units, 296 small units, and 207 branch-type units) were analyzed. Facilities that used centralized cooking were common in no-unit (100.0%) and large unit (83.3%) types, but less common in branch-type units (23.2%). Contrastingly, unit-based cooking was most prevalent in branch-type units (74.9%). Facilities using unit kitchens to cook all meals from raw ingredients were significantly more common among those using unit-based cooking than among those using centralized cooking (P < .001). Childcare workers and nursery teachers were significantly more involved in meal provision in branch-type units, whereas registered dietitians/dietitians were significantly less involved (P < .001).Conclusion Meal provision systems differed by residential type. Branch-type small-scale group care units, which provide a more home-like environment, relied heavily on childcare workers and nursery teachers for meal provision, whereas the involvement of dietitians is limited. These findings highlight the need for meal support systems that balance homelike environments with trained professional support.

[日本儿童之家按住宅类型的膳食供应系统的结构和挑战]。
目的儿童之家为没有监护人或遭受虐待的儿童提供稳定的生活环境。在日本,有一种倾向于小型住宿护理机构的运动,以实现“更像家的环境”。本研究将儿童日常生活空间中的膳食供应视为家庭环境的一个组成部分,旨在将儿童之家分为四种居住类型,并研究其膳食供应系统的特点和挑战。方法于2022年1月,在全国606个儿童之家进行问卷调查(500份,占82.5%)。分析的重点是由内部工作人员负责提供膳食的直接经营设施。设施根据其配置分为四种住宅类型;(a)无单位,(b)大单位(8名儿童以下),(c)小单位(≤8名儿童),(d)分院式小规模团体护理(位于主设施外)。分类考虑了膳食准备的地点和方法(“在一个厨房集中烹饪”或“以单位为单位烹饪”)以及提供膳食的职业。在有单位厨房的设施中,它们的用途被分类(“用所有原料煮熟”或“部分煮熟,如只煮米饭”),并按烹饪方式进行比较。结果分析了420个直营单位(住宅单位680个,无住宅单位99个,大型单位78个,小型单位296个,分支单位207个)的数据。使用集中烹饪的设施在无单元(100.0%)和大单元(83.3%)类型中很常见,但在分支型单元中较少(23.2%)。相比之下,以单位为基础的烹饪在分支型单位中最为普遍(74.9%)。使用单元厨房用原料烹饪所有食物的设施在使用单元烹饪的人中比使用集中烹饪的人中明显更常见(P < .001)。在分支单位,保育员和保育员对膳食供应的参与程度显著高于注册营养师/营养师(P < 0.001)。结论不同住宅类型的供餐制度存在差异。分支型小型团体护理单位提供更像家的环境,严重依赖托儿工作者和托儿所教师提供膳食,而营养师的参与有限。这些发现强调了膳食支持系统的必要性,它可以平衡家庭般的环境和训练有素的专业支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书