{"title":"Factors Associated With Nurses' Use of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine for Constipation to Promote Bowel Health.","authors":"Chia-Ling Huang, Hui-Ling Lai","doi":"10.1177/08980101261434770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To examine registered nurses' gastrointestinal health and their use of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) for constipation, and to explore demographic and professional correlates of CAIM adoption. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire to assess demographics, professional background, gastrointestinal health, and CAIM use. Items also captured knowledge sources, perceived barriers, and facilitators related to the use of CAIM. <b>Results:</b> Constipation was reported by approximately one-quarter of the nurses. About 70% of nurses used CAIM for constipation. The most frequently used modalities were probiotics, dietary fiber, lifestyle modification, and abdominal massage. Nurses primarily acquired knowledge from informal sources rather than evidence-based literature. The primary barrier to CAIM use was limited familiarity, and the main facilitator was fewer side effects. CAIM use was more likely among nurses who met recommended physical activity thresholds. It was not significantly associated with other demographic or professional characteristics. <b>Conclusion:</b> Nurses use CAIM for bowel health, yet reliance on informal sources reveals an evidence-literacy gap. Education, better access to high-quality syntheses, and organizational support may advance evidence-informed integration. Future work should expand modality coverage, include psychosocial and occupational measures, and use longitudinal or model-based designs to clarify mechanisms and causality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101261434770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101261434770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To examine registered nurses' gastrointestinal health and their use of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) for constipation, and to explore demographic and professional correlates of CAIM adoption. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire to assess demographics, professional background, gastrointestinal health, and CAIM use. Items also captured knowledge sources, perceived barriers, and facilitators related to the use of CAIM. Results: Constipation was reported by approximately one-quarter of the nurses. About 70% of nurses used CAIM for constipation. The most frequently used modalities were probiotics, dietary fiber, lifestyle modification, and abdominal massage. Nurses primarily acquired knowledge from informal sources rather than evidence-based literature. The primary barrier to CAIM use was limited familiarity, and the main facilitator was fewer side effects. CAIM use was more likely among nurses who met recommended physical activity thresholds. It was not significantly associated with other demographic or professional characteristics. Conclusion: Nurses use CAIM for bowel health, yet reliance on informal sources reveals an evidence-literacy gap. Education, better access to high-quality syntheses, and organizational support may advance evidence-informed integration. Future work should expand modality coverage, include psychosocial and occupational measures, and use longitudinal or model-based designs to clarify mechanisms and causality.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.