Factors Associated With Nurses' Use of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine for Constipation to Promote Bowel Health.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING
Chia-Ling Huang, Hui-Ling Lai
{"title":"Factors Associated With Nurses' Use of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine for Constipation to Promote Bowel Health.","authors":"Chia-Ling Huang, Hui-Ling Lai","doi":"10.1177/08980101261434770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To examine registered nurses' gastrointestinal health and their use of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) for constipation, and to explore demographic and professional correlates of CAIM adoption. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire to assess demographics, professional background, gastrointestinal health, and CAIM use. Items also captured knowledge sources, perceived barriers, and facilitators related to the use of CAIM. <b>Results:</b> Constipation was reported by approximately one-quarter of the nurses. About 70% of nurses used CAIM for constipation. The most frequently used modalities were probiotics, dietary fiber, lifestyle modification, and abdominal massage. Nurses primarily acquired knowledge from informal sources rather than evidence-based literature. The primary barrier to CAIM use was limited familiarity, and the main facilitator was fewer side effects. CAIM use was more likely among nurses who met recommended physical activity thresholds. It was not significantly associated with other demographic or professional characteristics. <b>Conclusion:</b> Nurses use CAIM for bowel health, yet reliance on informal sources reveals an evidence-literacy gap. Education, better access to high-quality syntheses, and organizational support may advance evidence-informed integration. Future work should expand modality coverage, include psychosocial and occupational measures, and use longitudinal or model-based designs to clarify mechanisms and causality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101261434770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101261434770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine registered nurses' gastrointestinal health and their use of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) for constipation, and to explore demographic and professional correlates of CAIM adoption. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire to assess demographics, professional background, gastrointestinal health, and CAIM use. Items also captured knowledge sources, perceived barriers, and facilitators related to the use of CAIM. Results: Constipation was reported by approximately one-quarter of the nurses. About 70% of nurses used CAIM for constipation. The most frequently used modalities were probiotics, dietary fiber, lifestyle modification, and abdominal massage. Nurses primarily acquired knowledge from informal sources rather than evidence-based literature. The primary barrier to CAIM use was limited familiarity, and the main facilitator was fewer side effects. CAIM use was more likely among nurses who met recommended physical activity thresholds. It was not significantly associated with other demographic or professional characteristics. Conclusion: Nurses use CAIM for bowel health, yet reliance on informal sources reveals an evidence-literacy gap. Education, better access to high-quality syntheses, and organizational support may advance evidence-informed integration. Future work should expand modality coverage, include psychosocial and occupational measures, and use longitudinal or model-based designs to clarify mechanisms and causality.

护士使用补充、替代和综合治疗便秘促进肠道健康的相关因素。
目的:调查注册护士的胃肠健康状况及其使用补充、替代和结合医学(CAIM)治疗便秘的情况,并探讨采用CAIM的人口统计学和专业相关性。方法:采用在线问卷进行横断面调查,评估人口统计学、专业背景、胃肠道健康和CAIM使用情况。项目还捕获了与使用CAIM相关的知识来源、感知到的障碍和促进因素。结果:约四分之一的护士报告便秘。约70%的护士使用CAIM治疗便秘。最常用的治疗方式是益生菌、膳食纤维、生活方式改变和腹部按摩。护士主要从非正式来源获得知识,而不是基于证据的文献。使用CAIM的主要障碍是熟悉程度有限,主要的促进因素是副作用较少。达到推荐体力活动阈值的护士更可能使用CAIM。它与其他人口统计学或职业特征没有显著关联。结论:护士使用CAIM进行肠道健康,但对非正式来源的依赖揭示了证据素养的差距。教育、更好地获得高质量综合和组织支持可能会推进循证整合。未来的工作应扩大模式覆盖范围,包括社会心理和职业措施,并使用纵向或基于模型的设计来阐明机制和因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书