Standards of Medical Judgment as a Vehicle for State Encroachment on the Practice of Medicine.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-25 DOI:10.1017/jme.2025.10214
Melissa Morgan, Carmel Shachar
{"title":"Standards of Medical Judgment as a Vehicle for State Encroachment on the Practice of Medicine.","authors":"Melissa Morgan, Carmel Shachar","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In their article <i>Objective Standards of Medical Judgment: A Myth of Abortion Law</i>, Graber et al. explore the different legal standards for evaluating if a physician properly offered abortion care under a medical exception to states' abortion restrictions. While this piece focuses tightly on the use of legal standards to limit access to abortion care, it should be understood in the broader context of a legal and political environment that is increasingly shifting the locus of medical decision-making power from the medical profession to state actors. We agree with Graber et al. that physicians should use their voices to speak out and educate the community on the medical decision-making process. But we are concerned that some state and legal actors are intentionally looking to improperly encroach upon the practice of medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":"54 1","pages":"44-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their article Objective Standards of Medical Judgment: A Myth of Abortion Law, Graber et al. explore the different legal standards for evaluating if a physician properly offered abortion care under a medical exception to states' abortion restrictions. While this piece focuses tightly on the use of legal standards to limit access to abortion care, it should be understood in the broader context of a legal and political environment that is increasingly shifting the locus of medical decision-making power from the medical profession to state actors. We agree with Graber et al. that physicians should use their voices to speak out and educate the community on the medical decision-making process. But we are concerned that some state and legal actors are intentionally looking to improperly encroach upon the practice of medicine.

医学判断标准作为国家干预医学实践的工具。
在他们的文章《医学判断的客观标准:堕胎法的神话》中,Graber等人探讨了不同的法律标准,以评估医生是否在国家堕胎限制的医疗例外情况下适当地提供堕胎护理。虽然这篇文章的重点是使用法律标准来限制获得堕胎护理的机会,但应该在更广泛的法律和政治环境背景下理解这篇文章,这种法律和政治环境正日益将医疗决策权的中心从医疗专业转向国家行为体。我们同意Graber等人的观点,即医生应该用他们的声音来发声,并在医疗决策过程中教育社区。但我们担心的是,一些国家和法律行为者有意寻求不恰当地侵犯医学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书