From Control to Care: Reframing Medication Access Policies Through Public Health Ethics.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-25 DOI:10.1017/jme.2025.10220
Kaitlyn Jaffe, Elizabeth A Evans
{"title":"From Control to Care: Reframing Medication Access Policies Through Public Health Ethics.","authors":"Kaitlyn Jaffe, Elizabeth A Evans","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dantuluri examines the ongoing prescription stimulant shortage driven by the Drug Enforcement Administration's quota restrictions and an ineffective and fragmented system of drug governance. We extend this analysis to carceral health systems, which operate under similar logics of control in managing risks, diversion, and liability around medications for opioid use disorder. In drawing these parallels, we explore how perceptions of risk, suspicion, and restrictive oversight can produce scarcity, reinforce stigma, and elicit judgments around \"deservingness\" that may ultimately widen treatment gaps. We conclude with actionable recommendations that align with public health ethics to promote equitable access to evidence-based treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":"54 1","pages":"95-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13054131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dantuluri examines the ongoing prescription stimulant shortage driven by the Drug Enforcement Administration's quota restrictions and an ineffective and fragmented system of drug governance. We extend this analysis to carceral health systems, which operate under similar logics of control in managing risks, diversion, and liability around medications for opioid use disorder. In drawing these parallels, we explore how perceptions of risk, suspicion, and restrictive oversight can produce scarcity, reinforce stigma, and elicit judgments around "deservingness" that may ultimately widen treatment gaps. We conclude with actionable recommendations that align with public health ethics to promote equitable access to evidence-based treatment.

从控制到护理:通过公共卫生伦理重新构建药物获取政策。
丹图鲁里研究了由美国缉毒局的配额限制和无效和分散的药物治理系统造成的处方兴奋剂短缺问题。我们将这一分析扩展到医疗卫生系统,该系统在管理阿片类药物使用障碍药物的风险、转移和责任方面,在类似的控制逻辑下运作。在绘制这些相似之处时,我们探讨了对风险、怀疑和限制性监督的认知如何产生稀缺,强化耻辱,并引发对“值得”的判断,最终可能扩大治疗差距。最后,我们提出了符合公共卫生伦理的可行建议,以促进公平获得循证治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书