{"title":"Personalized EMG preprocessing and normalization for musculoskeletal simulation.","authors":"Dovydas Cicėnas, Jurgita Žižienė, Kristina Daunoravičienė","doi":"10.1177/09287329261432854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAccurate interpretation of electromyography (EMG) signals is essential for reliable control of musculoskeletal (MS) models in biomechanics and rehabilitation applications. Conventional preprocessing methods may not account for subject-specific signal characteristics and task-related muscle function.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate an adaptive and personalized EMG preprocessing pipeline to enhance the physiological accuracy of EMG-driven musculoskeletal models during elbow flexion-extension tasks.MethodsEMG signals from six upper limb muscles were recorded using a Delsys system while participants performed elbow flexion-extension movements. The signals were preprocessed using individualized spectral filtering and a dual-stage normalization approach. First, dynamic maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) based min-max normalization was applied to standardize signal amplitudes. Second, functional weighting was used to scale each muscle's activation based on its biomechanical contribution to the movement. The processed signals were used as input to an OpenSim elbow model, and resulting joint kinematics were compared to reference motion data captured by an Xsens system.ResultsThe EMG-driven OpenSim model showed strong agreement with the Xsens data, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.98 and root mean square error (RMSE) values below 8°. While a minor systematic offset was observed, joint angle trajectories remained consistent and physiologically plausible across trials.ConclusionThe proposed subject-specific EMG preprocessing pipeline enhances the accuracy and interpretability of biomechanical models. Future research should explore adaptive signal alignment techniques and AI-based processing methods to improve model robustness in dynamic and wearable scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329261432854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329261432854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundAccurate interpretation of electromyography (EMG) signals is essential for reliable control of musculoskeletal (MS) models in biomechanics and rehabilitation applications. Conventional preprocessing methods may not account for subject-specific signal characteristics and task-related muscle function.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate an adaptive and personalized EMG preprocessing pipeline to enhance the physiological accuracy of EMG-driven musculoskeletal models during elbow flexion-extension tasks.MethodsEMG signals from six upper limb muscles were recorded using a Delsys system while participants performed elbow flexion-extension movements. The signals were preprocessed using individualized spectral filtering and a dual-stage normalization approach. First, dynamic maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) based min-max normalization was applied to standardize signal amplitudes. Second, functional weighting was used to scale each muscle's activation based on its biomechanical contribution to the movement. The processed signals were used as input to an OpenSim elbow model, and resulting joint kinematics were compared to reference motion data captured by an Xsens system.ResultsThe EMG-driven OpenSim model showed strong agreement with the Xsens data, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.98 and root mean square error (RMSE) values below 8°. While a minor systematic offset was observed, joint angle trajectories remained consistent and physiologically plausible across trials.ConclusionThe proposed subject-specific EMG preprocessing pipeline enhances the accuracy and interpretability of biomechanical models. Future research should explore adaptive signal alignment techniques and AI-based processing methods to improve model robustness in dynamic and wearable scenarios.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).