Re-Examination and Extension of Manual Dexterity Behavioral Data in M1 Lesioned Adult Macaque Monkeys: A Survey of Therapies Induced Enhancement of Functional Recovery.

IF 2.6 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroscience Insights Pub Date : 2026-03-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26331055261421348
Eric M Rouiller
{"title":"Re-Examination and Extension of Manual Dexterity Behavioral Data in M1 Lesioned Adult Macaque Monkeys: A Survey of Therapies Induced Enhancement of Functional Recovery.","authors":"Eric M Rouiller","doi":"10.1177/26331055261421348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present report offers a survey, with re-examination and extension of data, of previously published intermediate papers on the functional recovery of manual dexterity in non-human primates following primary motor cortex (M1) lesion, either spontaneous or enhanced with 2 distinct therapies. For each monkey, the M1 lesion volume was derived from histological sections. As a result of data extension, spontaneous recovery is represented here by individual data points derived from 14 monkeys, while data points from 8 monkeys represent therapy enhanced recovery. One therapy consisted of the administration immediately post-lesion of an anti-Nogo-A antibody (n = 4); the other treatment was a delayed autologous cellular therapy (ANCE; n = 4). The manual dexterity performance was longitudinally assessed during several years with the modified Brinkman Board task, testing the ability to grasp small food pellets from horizontal or vertical slots, using the precision grip. After M1 lesion, the grasping score dropped to zero, followed by a spontaneous, incomplete recovery in untreated monkeys, characterized by a unique plateau of recovery. In the majority of treated monkeys (n = 6), there was an additional second plateau of recovery, reflecting the effect of the treatment. Statistical non-parametric comparisons between the 14 untreated versus the 8 treated data points showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 subpopulations, based both on univariate statistics and bivariate statistics taking into account the lesion volume. This was true for recovery expressed as a degree of recuperation expressed in percent (post-lesion score/pre-lesion score × 100) as well as for the post-lesion scores only. The difference between the 2 subpopulations was more pronounced for the most difficult horizontal slots than for the less challenging vertical slots. In conclusion, the treatments appear to be efficient to promote functional motor recovery, even when considering post-lesion behavioral readouts only, as this would be the case in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":36527,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Insights","volume":"21 ","pages":"26331055261421348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13009617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055261421348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present report offers a survey, with re-examination and extension of data, of previously published intermediate papers on the functional recovery of manual dexterity in non-human primates following primary motor cortex (M1) lesion, either spontaneous or enhanced with 2 distinct therapies. For each monkey, the M1 lesion volume was derived from histological sections. As a result of data extension, spontaneous recovery is represented here by individual data points derived from 14 monkeys, while data points from 8 monkeys represent therapy enhanced recovery. One therapy consisted of the administration immediately post-lesion of an anti-Nogo-A antibody (n = 4); the other treatment was a delayed autologous cellular therapy (ANCE; n = 4). The manual dexterity performance was longitudinally assessed during several years with the modified Brinkman Board task, testing the ability to grasp small food pellets from horizontal or vertical slots, using the precision grip. After M1 lesion, the grasping score dropped to zero, followed by a spontaneous, incomplete recovery in untreated monkeys, characterized by a unique plateau of recovery. In the majority of treated monkeys (n = 6), there was an additional second plateau of recovery, reflecting the effect of the treatment. Statistical non-parametric comparisons between the 14 untreated versus the 8 treated data points showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 subpopulations, based both on univariate statistics and bivariate statistics taking into account the lesion volume. This was true for recovery expressed as a degree of recuperation expressed in percent (post-lesion score/pre-lesion score × 100) as well as for the post-lesion scores only. The difference between the 2 subpopulations was more pronounced for the most difficult horizontal slots than for the less challenging vertical slots. In conclusion, the treatments appear to be efficient to promote functional motor recovery, even when considering post-lesion behavioral readouts only, as this would be the case in clinical trials.

成年猕猴M1损伤手灵巧行为数据的重新检查和扩展:功能恢复增强疗法的调查。
本报告提供了一项调查,重新检查和扩展数据,先前发表的关于非人灵长类动物原发性运动皮层(M1)损伤后手工灵巧功能恢复的中间论文,无论是自发的还是通过两种不同的治疗方法增强的。每只猴子的M1病变体积来源于组织学切片。作为数据扩展的结果,这里的自发恢复由来自14只猴子的单个数据点表示,而来自8只猴子的数据点表示治疗增强的恢复。一种治疗包括在病变后立即给予抗nogo - a抗体(n = 4);另一组为延迟自体细胞治疗(ANCE; n = 4)。在几年的时间里,通过改进的Brinkman Board任务,对手的灵巧性进行了纵向评估,测试了使用精确握把从水平或垂直槽中抓取小食物颗粒的能力。M1损伤后,抓握得分降至零,随后未经治疗的猴子自发不完全恢复,具有独特的恢复平台期。在大多数接受治疗的猴子(n = 6)中,有额外的第二次恢复平台,反映了治疗的效果。在考虑病变体积的单变量统计和双变量统计的基础上,14个未治疗的数据点与8个治疗的数据点之间的统计非参数比较显示,两个亚群之间存在统计学上的显著差异。对于以百分比表示的恢复程度(病变后评分/病变前评分× 100)和仅病变后评分表示的恢复也是如此。两个亚种群之间的差异在最困难的水平槽中比在较不具挑战性的垂直槽中更为明显。总之,即使只考虑损伤后的行为读数,这些治疗似乎对促进功能性运动恢复是有效的,因为这将是临床试验的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience Insights
Neuroscience Insights Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书