Neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of the simple view of reading in clinically evaluated children with and without ADHD.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1037/neu0001078
Alissa M Cole-Olsen, Fatou Gaye, Julia O Obi, Christian J Padron, Michael J Kofler
{"title":"Neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of the simple view of reading in clinically evaluated children with and without ADHD.","authors":"Alissa M Cole-Olsen, Fatou Gaye, Julia O Obi, Christian J Padron, Michael J Kofler","doi":"10.1037/neu0001078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often exhibit difficulties across multiple reading domains. The \"simple view of reading\" model posits that reading comprehension skills-both for children with and without ADHD-can be understood by skills in two components: decoding and language comprehension. At the same time, research suggests that weaknesses in neurocognitive abilities, along with behavioral symptoms of ADHD, are closely linked to reading difficulties in this population. However, the most parsimonious set of neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of reading comprehension, and the pathways through which associations are conveyed, remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present study employed structural equation modeling to comprehensively examine neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of reading skills in a clinically evaluated sample of 396 children with and without ADHD (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 10.26, <i>SD</i> = 1.39; 172 girls; 68.9% White not Hispanic or Latino).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that working memory and fluid intelligence were the strongest neurocognitive predictors of reading skills and inattention and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms each predicted reading in the behavioral model. Consistent with the simple view of reading, associations between neurocognitive or behavioral predictors and reading comprehension were conveyed via decoding and language comprehension. When examining neurocognitive and behavioral predictors together, working memory and fluid intelligence predicted ADHD symptoms and reading skills, whereas ADHD symptoms no longer predicted reading skills, suggesting that neurocognitive weaknesses may help explain the link between inattention and reading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the role of neurocognitive weaknesses for comprehensively understanding reading difficulties in clinically evaluated children with and without ADHD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13023043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often exhibit difficulties across multiple reading domains. The "simple view of reading" model posits that reading comprehension skills-both for children with and without ADHD-can be understood by skills in two components: decoding and language comprehension. At the same time, research suggests that weaknesses in neurocognitive abilities, along with behavioral symptoms of ADHD, are closely linked to reading difficulties in this population. However, the most parsimonious set of neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of reading comprehension, and the pathways through which associations are conveyed, remains unclear.

Method: The present study employed structural equation modeling to comprehensively examine neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of reading skills in a clinically evaluated sample of 396 children with and without ADHD (Mage = 10.26, SD = 1.39; 172 girls; 68.9% White not Hispanic or Latino).

Results: Results revealed that working memory and fluid intelligence were the strongest neurocognitive predictors of reading skills and inattention and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms each predicted reading in the behavioral model. Consistent with the simple view of reading, associations between neurocognitive or behavioral predictors and reading comprehension were conveyed via decoding and language comprehension. When examining neurocognitive and behavioral predictors together, working memory and fluid intelligence predicted ADHD symptoms and reading skills, whereas ADHD symptoms no longer predicted reading skills, suggesting that neurocognitive weaknesses may help explain the link between inattention and reading.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the role of neurocognitive weaknesses for comprehensively understanding reading difficulties in clinically evaluated children with and without ADHD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

临床评估有或无ADHD儿童简单阅读观的神经认知和行为预测因子。
目的:患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童经常表现出跨多个阅读域的困难。“简单阅读观”模型认为,阅读理解技能——无论对患有或没有多动症的儿童——都可以通过两个部分的技能来理解:解码和语言理解。与此同时,研究表明,神经认知能力的弱点,以及多动症的行为症状,与这一人群的阅读困难密切相关。然而,阅读理解的最简单的神经认知和行为预测因素,以及传递关联的途径,仍不清楚。方法:本研究采用结构方程模型对396名有或无多动症儿童(Mage = 10.26, SD = 1.39; 172名女孩;68.9%白人,非西班牙裔或拉丁裔)的临床评估样本进行阅读技能的神经认知和行为预测。结果:结果显示,工作记忆和流体智力是阅读技能的最强神经认知预测因子,而注意力不集中和多动/冲动症状在行为模型中分别预测阅读能力。与阅读的简单观点一致,神经认知或行为预测因子与阅读理解之间的关联通过解码和语言理解来传达。当研究神经认知和行为预测因素时,工作记忆和流体智力预测ADHD症状和阅读能力,而ADHD症状不再预测阅读能力,这表明神经认知缺陷可能有助于解释注意力不集中和阅读能力之间的联系。结论:这些发现强调了神经认知缺陷在全面理解临床评估的有或无ADHD儿童阅读困难中的作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书