Minimally Invasive Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Early Experience With Endoscopic and Robotic Techniques.

IF 1.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Sandip M Bipte, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Revathi G, Jayanti Thumsi, Sadashiv Choudhari
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Early Experience With Endoscopic and Robotic Techniques.","authors":"Sandip M Bipte, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Revathi G, Jayanti Thumsi, Sadashiv Choudhari","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2026.2025-9-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), performed via endoscopic or robotic-assisted approaches, has been developed to improve cosmetic and psychosocial outcomes without compromising oncologic safety. While international experience is growing, data from low- and middle-income countries remain limited.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case series of five consecutive patients (six breasts) who underwent minimally invasive NSM between January 2024 and June 2025 in an Indian center. Three patients underwent conventional endoscopic NSM and two underwent robotic-assisted NSM (one unilateral and one bilateral). Data collected included demographic and genetic status, tumor biology, operative details, reconstruction method, perioperative complications, pathology, and short-term follow-up. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety; secondary endpoints were margin status, early oncologic outcomes, and cosmetic satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were completed successfully without conversion to open surgery. Median (range) operative time was 210 (180-300) minutes, with robotic procedures requiring longer duration. No intraoperative complications, nipple-areolar necrosis, or implant losses were observed. Two patients developed minor seromas that resolved with aspiration. Pathological margins were negative in all cases. At a median follow-up of six (4-18) months, all patients were alive, disease-free, and reported good-to-excellent cosmetic satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our early experience demonstrates that both endoscopic and robotic-assisted NSM are feasible and safe in carefully selected patients, providing satisfactory oncologic and esthetic outcomes. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the very small sample size, short follow-up, and absence of a comparator group. Larger prospective multicenter studies with long-term outcomes are required to confirm oncologic safety and define the role of minimally invasive NSM India.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"22 2","pages":"165-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13011157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2026.2025-9-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), performed via endoscopic or robotic-assisted approaches, has been developed to improve cosmetic and psychosocial outcomes without compromising oncologic safety. While international experience is growing, data from low- and middle-income countries remain limited.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of five consecutive patients (six breasts) who underwent minimally invasive NSM between January 2024 and June 2025 in an Indian center. Three patients underwent conventional endoscopic NSM and two underwent robotic-assisted NSM (one unilateral and one bilateral). Data collected included demographic and genetic status, tumor biology, operative details, reconstruction method, perioperative complications, pathology, and short-term follow-up. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety; secondary endpoints were margin status, early oncologic outcomes, and cosmetic satisfaction.

Results: All procedures were completed successfully without conversion to open surgery. Median (range) operative time was 210 (180-300) minutes, with robotic procedures requiring longer duration. No intraoperative complications, nipple-areolar necrosis, or implant losses were observed. Two patients developed minor seromas that resolved with aspiration. Pathological margins were negative in all cases. At a median follow-up of six (4-18) months, all patients were alive, disease-free, and reported good-to-excellent cosmetic satisfaction.

Conclusion: Our early experience demonstrates that both endoscopic and robotic-assisted NSM are feasible and safe in carefully selected patients, providing satisfactory oncologic and esthetic outcomes. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the very small sample size, short follow-up, and absence of a comparator group. Larger prospective multicenter studies with long-term outcomes are required to confirm oncologic safety and define the role of minimally invasive NSM India.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

微创保留乳头乳房切除术:内镜和机器人技术的早期经验。
目的:微创保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM),通过内镜或机器人辅助的方法,已经发展到改善美容和社会心理结果,而不影响肿瘤安全性。虽然国际经验不断增加,但来自低收入和中等收入国家的数据仍然有限。材料和方法:我们对2024年1月至2025年6月在印度一家中心连续接受微创NSM的5例患者(6个乳房)进行了回顾性病例系列研究。3例患者接受了传统的内窥镜NSM, 2例接受了机器人辅助的NSM(单侧和双侧)。收集的资料包括人口统计学和遗传状况、肿瘤生物学、手术细节、重建方法、围手术期并发症、病理和短期随访。主要终点为可行性和安全性;次要终点是边缘状态、早期肿瘤预后和美容满意度。结果:所有手术均顺利完成,未转开腹手术。中位(范围)手术时间为210(180-300)分钟,机器人手术需要更长的时间。无术中并发症、乳头乳晕坏死或种植体丢失。2例患者出现轻微血清肿,经抽吸后消退。所有病例病理边缘均为阴性。在中位随访6(4-18)个月时,所有患者均存活,无疾病,并报告良好至极好的美容满意度。结论:我们的早期经验表明,在精心挑选的患者中,内镜和机器人辅助的NSM都是可行和安全的,可以提供令人满意的肿瘤和美学结果。然而,由于样本量很小,随访时间短,并且没有比较组,这些结果应该谨慎解释。需要更大的前瞻性多中心长期结果研究来确认肿瘤安全性并确定微创NSM在印度的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书