Sarah Walmsley, Marie Huska, Zoe Aitken, Manjula Marella, Anne Kavanagh, Kaloyan Kamenov, Darryl Barrett, Alexandra Devine
{"title":"Monitoring and evaluation of health disparities for people with disability in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.","authors":"Sarah Walmsley, Marie Huska, Zoe Aitken, Manjula Marella, Anne Kavanagh, Kaloyan Kamenov, Darryl Barrett, Alexandra Devine","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with disability experience health inequities and mostly live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), as this is where most of the world's population resides. Despite this, existing evidence on health equity for people with disability mostly comes from high-income settings. Monitoring and evaluation of health equity is crucial for countries to address and track progress towards goals, such as the highest attainable standard of health for people with disability. This scoping review aimed to summarise the available literature on approaches and indicators used in LMIC to compare health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We included peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2024 that compared health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We identified 59 eligible studies, from a broad range of LMIC. Disability indicators varied, with most studies using one of multiple Washington Group (WG) sets to enable disaggregation of data by disability status. Survey data was most frequently used, with only two studies using administrative data. A wide range of health-related outcomes were explored, with themes of maternal and child health, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related outcomes emerging as key areas of focus. Disparities were consistently found, with almost all included studies finding poorer outcomes for people with compared to people without disability. There was a noticeable lack of action taken to improve future policy or monitoring and evaluation or to enact real and meaningful change in health equity for people with disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People with disability experience health inequities and mostly live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), as this is where most of the world's population resides. Despite this, existing evidence on health equity for people with disability mostly comes from high-income settings. Monitoring and evaluation of health equity is crucial for countries to address and track progress towards goals, such as the highest attainable standard of health for people with disability. This scoping review aimed to summarise the available literature on approaches and indicators used in LMIC to compare health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We included peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2024 that compared health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We identified 59 eligible studies, from a broad range of LMIC. Disability indicators varied, with most studies using one of multiple Washington Group (WG) sets to enable disaggregation of data by disability status. Survey data was most frequently used, with only two studies using administrative data. A wide range of health-related outcomes were explored, with themes of maternal and child health, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related outcomes emerging as key areas of focus. Disparities were consistently found, with almost all included studies finding poorer outcomes for people with compared to people without disability. There was a noticeable lack of action taken to improve future policy or monitoring and evaluation or to enact real and meaningful change in health equity for people with disability.
残疾人面临卫生不公平待遇,他们大多生活在低收入和中等收入国家,因为世界上大多数人口居住在这些国家。尽管如此,关于残疾人卫生公平的现有证据大多来自高收入环境。对卫生公平的监测和评价对于各国处理和跟踪实现残疾人可达到的最高健康标准等目标的进展至关重要。这项范围审查的目的是总结关于低收入和中等收入国家用于比较残疾人和非残疾人之间健康相关结果的方法和指标的现有文献。我们纳入了2008年至2024年间发表的同行评议文章,这些文章比较了残疾人和非残疾人之间的健康相关结果。我们从广泛的LMIC中确定了59项符合条件的研究。残疾指标各不相同,大多数研究使用多个Washington Group (WG)集合中的一个,以便按残疾状况分列数据。最常使用的是调查数据,只有两项研究使用了行政数据。探讨了范围广泛的与健康有关的成果,妇幼保健主题以及与人体免疫缺陷病毒(艾滋病毒)有关的成果成为重点领域。差异一直被发现,几乎所有纳入的研究都发现,与没有残疾的人相比,残疾人的结果更差。显然没有采取行动改进今后的政策或监测和评价,也没有在残疾人保健公平方面作出真正和有意义的改变。
期刊介绍:
Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.