Monitoring and evaluation of health disparities for people with disability in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah Walmsley, Marie Huska, Zoe Aitken, Manjula Marella, Anne Kavanagh, Kaloyan Kamenov, Darryl Barrett, Alexandra Devine
{"title":"Monitoring and evaluation of health disparities for people with disability in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.","authors":"Sarah Walmsley, Marie Huska, Zoe Aitken, Manjula Marella, Anne Kavanagh, Kaloyan Kamenov, Darryl Barrett, Alexandra Devine","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with disability experience health inequities and mostly live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), as this is where most of the world's population resides. Despite this, existing evidence on health equity for people with disability mostly comes from high-income settings. Monitoring and evaluation of health equity is crucial for countries to address and track progress towards goals, such as the highest attainable standard of health for people with disability. This scoping review aimed to summarise the available literature on approaches and indicators used in LMIC to compare health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We included peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2024 that compared health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We identified 59 eligible studies, from a broad range of LMIC. Disability indicators varied, with most studies using one of multiple Washington Group (WG) sets to enable disaggregation of data by disability status. Survey data was most frequently used, with only two studies using administrative data. A wide range of health-related outcomes were explored, with themes of maternal and child health, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related outcomes emerging as key areas of focus. Disparities were consistently found, with almost all included studies finding poorer outcomes for people with compared to people without disability. There was a noticeable lack of action taken to improve future policy or monitoring and evaluation or to enact real and meaningful change in health equity for people with disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with disability experience health inequities and mostly live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), as this is where most of the world's population resides. Despite this, existing evidence on health equity for people with disability mostly comes from high-income settings. Monitoring and evaluation of health equity is crucial for countries to address and track progress towards goals, such as the highest attainable standard of health for people with disability. This scoping review aimed to summarise the available literature on approaches and indicators used in LMIC to compare health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We included peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2024 that compared health-related outcomes between people with and without disability. We identified 59 eligible studies, from a broad range of LMIC. Disability indicators varied, with most studies using one of multiple Washington Group (WG) sets to enable disaggregation of data by disability status. Survey data was most frequently used, with only two studies using administrative data. A wide range of health-related outcomes were explored, with themes of maternal and child health, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related outcomes emerging as key areas of focus. Disparities were consistently found, with almost all included studies finding poorer outcomes for people with compared to people without disability. There was a noticeable lack of action taken to improve future policy or monitoring and evaluation or to enact real and meaningful change in health equity for people with disability.

监测和评价低收入和中等收入国家残疾人的健康差距:范围审查。
残疾人面临卫生不公平待遇,他们大多生活在低收入和中等收入国家,因为世界上大多数人口居住在这些国家。尽管如此,关于残疾人卫生公平的现有证据大多来自高收入环境。对卫生公平的监测和评价对于各国处理和跟踪实现残疾人可达到的最高健康标准等目标的进展至关重要。这项范围审查的目的是总结关于低收入和中等收入国家用于比较残疾人和非残疾人之间健康相关结果的方法和指标的现有文献。我们纳入了2008年至2024年间发表的同行评议文章,这些文章比较了残疾人和非残疾人之间的健康相关结果。我们从广泛的LMIC中确定了59项符合条件的研究。残疾指标各不相同,大多数研究使用多个Washington Group (WG)集合中的一个,以便按残疾状况分列数据。最常使用的是调查数据,只有两项研究使用了行政数据。探讨了范围广泛的与健康有关的成果,妇幼保健主题以及与人体免疫缺陷病毒(艾滋病毒)有关的成果成为重点领域。差异一直被发现,几乎所有纳入的研究都发现,与没有残疾的人相比,残疾人的结果更差。显然没有采取行动改进今后的政策或监测和评价,也没有在残疾人保健公平方面作出真正和有意义的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Reviews
Epidemiologic Reviews 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书