A network analysis of obsessive-compulsive patients in intensive outpatient treatment.

IF 6.7
Valerie S Swisher, Kate Rogers, Sandra Hadlock, Michelle G Newman
{"title":"A network analysis of obsessive-compulsive patients in intensive outpatient treatment.","authors":"Valerie S Swisher, Kate Rogers, Sandra Hadlock, Michelle G Newman","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2026.10184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The network theory of mental disorders posits that associations between symptoms activate other symptoms to maintain a disorder over time. Network analytic approaches therefore may inform treatment targets. In the present study, we compared baseline OCD symptom networks among treatment responders to non-responders and examined how network structure and connectivity changed from before to after exposure and response prevention (ERP) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community adults with OCD (<i>n</i> = 712) who underwent intensive outpatient treatment were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) at admission and discharge. Network comparison tests were used to (a) examine differences in baseline symptom network structures between treatment responders versus non-responders and (b) examine changes in network structures from pre- to post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-treatment network structures and global connectivity did not differ significantly between treatment responders and non-responders. However, post-treatment networks exhibited greater global strength (i.e., stronger associations between OCD symptoms) and significantly different network structure (i.e., different patterns of associations between OCD symptoms) relative to the pre-treatment network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings showed that network structure and connectivity in OCD may be more informative as a marker of therapeutic change than in discriminating treatment responders from nonresponders using baseline symptoms. After ERP treatment, associations between obsessions and compulsions demonstrated significantly greater global network strength and altered network structure, thus underscoring the potential for network approaches to identify mechanisms of change throughout OCD treatment. Future studies incorporating session-by-session data may clarify when and how these network shifts occur over the course of therapy to help identify treatment targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":520621,"journal":{"name":"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists","volume":" ","pages":"e46"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13122522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2026.10184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The network theory of mental disorders posits that associations between symptoms activate other symptoms to maintain a disorder over time. Network analytic approaches therefore may inform treatment targets. In the present study, we compared baseline OCD symptom networks among treatment responders to non-responders and examined how network structure and connectivity changed from before to after exposure and response prevention (ERP) treatment.

Methods: Community adults with OCD (n = 712) who underwent intensive outpatient treatment were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) at admission and discharge. Network comparison tests were used to (a) examine differences in baseline symptom network structures between treatment responders versus non-responders and (b) examine changes in network structures from pre- to post-treatment.

Results: Pre-treatment network structures and global connectivity did not differ significantly between treatment responders and non-responders. However, post-treatment networks exhibited greater global strength (i.e., stronger associations between OCD symptoms) and significantly different network structure (i.e., different patterns of associations between OCD symptoms) relative to the pre-treatment network.

Conclusions: Findings showed that network structure and connectivity in OCD may be more informative as a marker of therapeutic change than in discriminating treatment responders from nonresponders using baseline symptoms. After ERP treatment, associations between obsessions and compulsions demonstrated significantly greater global network strength and altered network structure, thus underscoring the potential for network approaches to identify mechanisms of change throughout OCD treatment. Future studies incorporating session-by-session data may clarify when and how these network shifts occur over the course of therapy to help identify treatment targets.

门诊重症强迫症患者的网络分析。
背景:精神障碍的网络理论认为,症状之间的关联会激活其他症状,从而长期维持一种疾病。因此,网络分析方法可以为治疗目标提供信息。在本研究中,我们比较了治疗反应者和无反应者的基线强迫症症状网络,并研究了暴露和反应预防(ERP)治疗前后网络结构和连通性的变化。方法:采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(YBOCS)在入院和出院时对社区成年强迫症患者(n = 712)进行评估。网络比较测试用于(a)检查治疗反应者与无反应者之间基线症状网络结构的差异,(b)检查治疗前到治疗后网络结构的变化。结果:治疗前网络结构和整体连通性在治疗反应者和无反应者之间无显著差异。然而,与治疗前网络相比,治疗后网络表现出更大的整体强度(即强迫症症状之间更强的关联)和显著不同的网络结构(即强迫症症状之间不同的关联模式)。结论:研究结果表明,强迫症的网络结构和连通性可能比用基线症状区分治疗反应者和无反应者更能作为治疗变化的标志。在ERP治疗后,强迫和强迫之间的关联显示出更大的全球网络强度和改变的网络结构,从而强调了网络方法在强迫症治疗过程中识别变化机制的潜力。未来的研究结合每个疗程的数据,可能会澄清这些网络在治疗过程中何时以及如何发生变化,以帮助确定治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书