A Novel Quantitative Analysis in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: How does it compare to the “Golden Eye”?

IF 4.7 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.03.009
Yue Guo, Juncheng Ni, Esteban Lucas Solari, Alberto Villagran Asiares, Stephan G. Nekolla
{"title":"A Novel Quantitative Analysis in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: How does it compare to the “Golden Eye”?","authors":"Yue Guo,&nbsp;Juncheng Ni,&nbsp;Esteban Lucas Solari,&nbsp;Alberto Villagran Asiares,&nbsp;Stephan G. Nekolla","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Myocardial Perfusion Imaging is widely used to evaluate left ventricular perfusion in patients with ischemic heart disease. Semi-quantitative scores, such as Total Perfusion Deficit (TPD), are frequently used for the assessment of extent and severity of disease. TPD scores are based on a frequentist analysis of tracer distribution in perfusion polar maps, which are 2D polar representations of radiopharmaceutical tracer uptake in the left ventricular cardiac wall. In this paper, we propose a novel quantification method for MPI examinations. Our method approaches the problem from an inverse perspective to TPD, allowing the assessment of the severity and extension of abnormal perfusion from the synergetic contribution of all the left ventricular tracer uptake in a polar map. We analytically demonstrate that TPD can be viewed as a specific instance of a broader approach. Furthermore, we explore how to establish the quantitative analysis in a general approach. To test our new method, we leveraged a standard deep learning architecture for the prediction of abnormal perfusion and used gradient-based class activation maps as a measure of the abnormal perfusion territory, which facilitated the quantification of both the severity and extent of the perfusion deficit. In the absence of ground-truth data such as survival rates or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) criteria, our results demonstrate both statistical and visual consistency with the conventional TPD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 390-398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093938892600022X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging is widely used to evaluate left ventricular perfusion in patients with ischemic heart disease. Semi-quantitative scores, such as Total Perfusion Deficit (TPD), are frequently used for the assessment of extent and severity of disease. TPD scores are based on a frequentist analysis of tracer distribution in perfusion polar maps, which are 2D polar representations of radiopharmaceutical tracer uptake in the left ventricular cardiac wall. In this paper, we propose a novel quantification method for MPI examinations. Our method approaches the problem from an inverse perspective to TPD, allowing the assessment of the severity and extension of abnormal perfusion from the synergetic contribution of all the left ventricular tracer uptake in a polar map. We analytically demonstrate that TPD can be viewed as a specific instance of a broader approach. Furthermore, we explore how to establish the quantitative analysis in a general approach. To test our new method, we leveraged a standard deep learning architecture for the prediction of abnormal perfusion and used gradient-based class activation maps as a measure of the abnormal perfusion territory, which facilitated the quantification of both the severity and extent of the perfusion deficit. In the absence of ground-truth data such as survival rates or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) criteria, our results demonstrate both statistical and visual consistency with the conventional TPD.
一种新的心肌灌注成像定量分析方法:与“黄金眼”相比如何?
心肌灌注显像被广泛用于评价缺血性心脏病患者左心室灌注。半定量评分,如总灌注不足(TPD),经常用于评估疾病的程度和严重程度。TPD评分基于灌注极性图中示踪剂分布的频率分析,这是左心室心壁放射性药物示踪剂摄取的二维极性表示。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的量化方法的MPI检查。我们的方法从与TPD相反的角度来解决这个问题,允许通过极坐标图中所有左心室示踪剂摄取的协同作用来评估异常灌注的严重程度和扩展。我们分析表明,TPD可以被视为一个更广泛的方法的具体实例。此外,我们还探讨了如何在一般方法中建立定量分析。为了测试我们的新方法,我们利用标准的深度学习架构来预测异常灌注,并使用基于梯度的类激活图作为异常灌注区域的测量,这有助于量化灌注缺陷的严重程度和程度。在缺乏诸如生存率或主要心血管不良事件(MACE)标准等基本事实数据的情况下,我们的研究结果显示了与传统TPD的统计和视觉一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书