Robert H Williamson, Jordan A Fong, Jewels Darrow, Logan Reeg, Nate Nelson, Alina Iuga, David Gerber, Michael B Sano
{"title":"Impact of Voltage on the Production on Spherical Ablations for Integrated Time Nanosecond Pulse Irreversible Electroporation.","authors":"Robert H Williamson, Jordan A Fong, Jewels Darrow, Logan Reeg, Nate Nelson, Alina Iuga, David Gerber, Michael B Sano","doi":"10.1177/25763113251381088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the safety and reproducibility of high-voltage integrated nanosecond pulse irreversible electroporation (INSPIRE) administered through a single applicator and grounding pad approach in a healthy liver model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A percutaneous approach to the liver was made under ultrasound guidance in female pigs weighing between 25 and 35 kg. INSPIRE treatments at 3000 V, 4500 V, and 6000 V using 1000 ns or 2000 ns waveforms, with a 0.02 s dose and a 45°C temperature set point were delivered using an actively cooled single applicator and distal grounding pad. Ablation size, muscle stimulation, and cardiac safety were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All INSPIRE treatments were completed successfully without cardiac synchronization or break-through muscle stimulation. Ablations were visible on ultrasound shortly after treatments were complete. Treatments were completed within approximately 2-8 minutes. The largest ablations, achieved with the 2000 ns waveform at 6000 V, measured 4.4 ± 0.7 cm by 2.9 ± 0.1 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>INSPIRE can be safely used to achieve significantly larger ablations significantly faster than current irreversible electroporation (IRE) technologies using a simplified single-applicator and grounding pad approach.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>INSPIRE overcomes technical and procedural challenges facing IRE including ablation size limitations, muscle stimulation, the need for cardiac synchronization, long procedure times, and the lack of visualization during procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":29923,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectricity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13001996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectricity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25763113251381088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To study the safety and reproducibility of high-voltage integrated nanosecond pulse irreversible electroporation (INSPIRE) administered through a single applicator and grounding pad approach in a healthy liver model.
Methods: A percutaneous approach to the liver was made under ultrasound guidance in female pigs weighing between 25 and 35 kg. INSPIRE treatments at 3000 V, 4500 V, and 6000 V using 1000 ns or 2000 ns waveforms, with a 0.02 s dose and a 45°C temperature set point were delivered using an actively cooled single applicator and distal grounding pad. Ablation size, muscle stimulation, and cardiac safety were evaluated.
Results: All INSPIRE treatments were completed successfully without cardiac synchronization or break-through muscle stimulation. Ablations were visible on ultrasound shortly after treatments were complete. Treatments were completed within approximately 2-8 minutes. The largest ablations, achieved with the 2000 ns waveform at 6000 V, measured 4.4 ± 0.7 cm by 2.9 ± 0.1 cm.
Conclusion: INSPIRE can be safely used to achieve significantly larger ablations significantly faster than current irreversible electroporation (IRE) technologies using a simplified single-applicator and grounding pad approach.
Significance: INSPIRE overcomes technical and procedural challenges facing IRE including ablation size limitations, muscle stimulation, the need for cardiac synchronization, long procedure times, and the lack of visualization during procedures.