Longitudinal Subphenotyping of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Implications in Prognostic Prediction and Clinical Intervention.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-22 DOI:10.1002/resp.70239
Yanan Zhou, Ying Wang, Linlin Wang, Jing Bi, Yanping Yang, Wenyu Xing, Yuanlin Song, Weibing Wang, Dongni Hou
{"title":"Longitudinal Subphenotyping of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Implications in Prognostic Prediction and Clinical Intervention.","authors":"Yanan Zhou, Ying Wang, Linlin Wang, Jing Bi, Yanping Yang, Wenyu Xing, Yuanlin Song, Weibing Wang, Dongni Hou","doi":"10.1002/resp.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To identify the longitudinal subphenotypes (LSPs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and their transitions, and to evaluate their potential for prognostic prediction and guiding interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicohort study derived its cohort from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China. Feature selection was performed using univariate analysis, recursive feature elimination, and correlation analysis, followed by longitudinal latent profile analysis. Cox regression model was used to compare differences in mortality and responses to interventions. A predictive model was developed through selection from nine candidate machine learning algorithms followed by grid search optimization and subsequently applied to an independent validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred ninety seven patients were included in the derivation dataset. Utilizing the 20 most prognostically relevant variables, three distinct LSPs were identified. Based on Day 1, the LSPs accounted for 36.41%, 36.71%, and 26.88%, respectively. LSP 1 (HR 5.119; 95% CI: 3.657-7.165) and LSP 2 (HR 2.922; 95% CI: 2.063-4.139) were associated with higher mortality. Both high-dose corticosteroids and invasive mechanical ventilation failed to elicit a treatment response in LSP 2 and LSP 3. Conversely, prone positioning proved to be an effective intervention for LSP 2. An early shift from LSP 1 to LSP 2 was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.679; 95% CI: 1.051-2.683). Furthermore, the optimized random forest model demonstrated superior performance in differentiating the three LSPs and could identify consistent subphenotypes in validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating temporal subphenotype evolution into prognostic stratification and personalized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":"578-589"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/resp.70239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: To identify the longitudinal subphenotypes (LSPs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and their transitions, and to evaluate their potential for prognostic prediction and guiding interventions.

Methods: This retrospective multicohort study derived its cohort from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China. Feature selection was performed using univariate analysis, recursive feature elimination, and correlation analysis, followed by longitudinal latent profile analysis. Cox regression model was used to compare differences in mortality and responses to interventions. A predictive model was developed through selection from nine candidate machine learning algorithms followed by grid search optimization and subsequently applied to an independent validation cohort.

Results: Nine hundred ninety seven patients were included in the derivation dataset. Utilizing the 20 most prognostically relevant variables, three distinct LSPs were identified. Based on Day 1, the LSPs accounted for 36.41%, 36.71%, and 26.88%, respectively. LSP 1 (HR 5.119; 95% CI: 3.657-7.165) and LSP 2 (HR 2.922; 95% CI: 2.063-4.139) were associated with higher mortality. Both high-dose corticosteroids and invasive mechanical ventilation failed to elicit a treatment response in LSP 2 and LSP 3. Conversely, prone positioning proved to be an effective intervention for LSP 2. An early shift from LSP 1 to LSP 2 was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.679; 95% CI: 1.051-2.683). Furthermore, the optimized random forest model demonstrated superior performance in differentiating the three LSPs and could identify consistent subphenotypes in validation cohort.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating temporal subphenotype evolution into prognostic stratification and personalized treatment.

急性呼吸窘迫综合征的纵向亚表型:在预后预测和临床干预中的意义。
背景与目的:确定急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的纵向亚表型(LSPs)及其转变,并评估其预后预测和指导干预的潜力。方法:本回顾性多队列研究来源于中国复旦大学中山医院。采用单变量分析、递归特征消除和相关分析进行特征选择,然后进行纵向潜在剖面分析。采用Cox回归模型比较死亡率和干预反应的差异。通过从九种候选机器学习算法中进行选择,然后进行网格搜索优化,建立了预测模型,随后将其应用于独立验证队列。结果:997例患者被纳入衍生数据集。利用20个与预后最相关的变量,确定了三个不同的lsp。从第1天开始,lsp占比分别为36.41%、36.71%和26.88%。LSP 1 (HR 5.119; 95% CI: 3.657-7.165)和LSP 2 (HR 2.922; 95% CI: 2.063-4.139)与较高的死亡率相关。在LSP 2和LSP 3中,大剂量皮质类固醇和有创机械通气均未能引起治疗反应。相反,俯卧定位被证明是对LSP 2的有效干预。早期从LSP 1转移到LSP 2与死亡率增加相关(HR 1.679; 95% CI: 1.051-2.683)。此外,优化后的随机森林模型在区分三种lsp方面表现出优越的性能,并能在验证队列中识别一致的亚表型。结论:我们的研究结果强调了将时间亚表型进化纳入预后分层和个性化治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书