The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Asbjørn Risom, Malene Schwarz Dyreholt, Natacha Blauenfeldt Kyster, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Birte Smidt, Ulla Knorr, Kim Brøndmark, Anja Mathiesen, Denis Cululejevic, Rene Sjaelland, Henrik Nørbak-Emig, Lotte Linnemann Sponsor, Darius Mardosas, Jens Drachmann Bukh, Trine Vøgg Heller, Nanna Iversen, Maj Vinberg, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, Lars Vedel Kessing
{"title":"The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial.","authors":"Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Asbjørn Risom, Malene Schwarz Dyreholt, Natacha Blauenfeldt Kyster, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Birte Smidt, Ulla Knorr, Kim Brøndmark, Anja Mathiesen, Denis Cululejevic, Rene Sjaelland, Henrik Nørbak-Emig, Lotte Linnemann Sponsor, Darius Mardosas, Jens Drachmann Bukh, Trine Vøgg Heller, Nanna Iversen, Maj Vinberg, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, Lars Vedel Kessing","doi":"10.1186/s40345-026-00418-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder experience daily variability in mood that seems associated with poor prognostic factors, including impaired functioning, and increased risk of hospitalisation and relapse. The present SmartBipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether group (1) daily smartphone-based outpatient monitoring and treatment including CBT elements with clinical feedback (intervention group) versus group (2) daily smartphone-based monitoring and treatment with CBT elements without clinical feedback (content was the same as intervention group but without clinical feedback) (control group) or group (3) daily smartphone-based mood monitoring only without CBT elements or other smartphone content (control group), improved mood instability and other clinically relevant patient-related outcomes in patients who have had a bipolar disorder for more than two years, and typically many years. METHODS: This study was a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up period of 6 months. The outcomes were (1) mood instability (primary), (2) questionnaire-based evaluations of quality of life, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, perceived stress, as well as smartphone-based measures of mood, activity, stress, anxiety, irritability, and sleep. Group differences were quantified using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients with progressed bipolar disorder were included as part of their specialised outpatient treatment in the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. The trial began in March 2021 with last patient follow-up in July 2025. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no differences in the primary outcome mood instability (difference: 0, 95%CI: -0.16; 0.16, p = 0.98). In addition, there were no differences in other patient-reported outcome measures. LIMITATIONS: This was an unblinded trial. CONCLUSION: There was no positive or negative effects of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on primary or secondary outcomes in the present trial. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04230421. Registered January, 2020. </p>","PeriodicalId":13944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13129000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-026-00418-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder experience daily variability in mood that seems associated with poor prognostic factors, including impaired functioning, and increased risk of hospitalisation and relapse. The present SmartBipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether group (1) daily smartphone-based outpatient monitoring and treatment including CBT elements with clinical feedback (intervention group) versus group (2) daily smartphone-based monitoring and treatment with CBT elements without clinical feedback (content was the same as intervention group but without clinical feedback) (control group) or group (3) daily smartphone-based mood monitoring only without CBT elements or other smartphone content (control group), improved mood instability and other clinically relevant patient-related outcomes in patients who have had a bipolar disorder for more than two years, and typically many years. METHODS: This study was a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up period of 6 months. The outcomes were (1) mood instability (primary), (2) questionnaire-based evaluations of quality of life, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, perceived stress, as well as smartphone-based measures of mood, activity, stress, anxiety, irritability, and sleep. Group differences were quantified using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients with progressed bipolar disorder were included as part of their specialised outpatient treatment in the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. The trial began in March 2021 with last patient follow-up in July 2025. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no differences in the primary outcome mood instability (difference: 0, 95%CI: -0.16; 0.16, p = 0.98). In addition, there were no differences in other patient-reported outcome measures. LIMITATIONS: This was an unblinded trial. CONCLUSION: There was no positive or negative effects of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on primary or secondary outcomes in the present trial. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04230421. Registered January, 2020.

基于智能手机的监测和治疗(包括临床反馈)对进展性双相情感障碍的影响:SmartBipolar试验随机对照平行组试验。
导读:相当比例的双相情感障碍患者经历每日情绪变化,这似乎与不良预后因素相关,包括功能受损、住院和复发风险增加。目前的SmartBipolar随机对照试验(RCT)调查了组(1)每天基于智能手机的门诊监测和治疗包括CBT元素并有临床反馈(干预组),组(2)每天基于智能手机的监测和治疗包括CBT元素但没有临床反馈(内容与干预组相同,但没有临床反馈)(对照组)或组(3)每天基于智能手机的情绪监测仅没有CBT元素或其他智能手机内容(对照组),改善情绪不稳定和其他临床相关的患者相关结果,这些患者患有双相情感障碍超过两年,通常是多年。方法:本研究是一项实用的随机对照试验,随访期为6个月。结果为:(1)情绪不稳定(主要);(2)基于问卷的生活质量评估、抑郁症状、躁狂症状、感知压力,以及基于智能手机的情绪、活动、压力、焦虑、易怒和睡眠测量。采用线性混合模型量化组间差异。结果:共有201名进展性双相情感障碍患者被纳入丹麦首都地区精神卫生服务机构的专业门诊治疗。该试验于2021年3月开始,最后一次患者随访于2025年7月进行。意向治疗分析显示,主要结局情绪不稳定无差异(差异:0,95%CI: -0.16; 0.16, p = 0.98)。此外,在其他患者报告的结果测量中也没有差异。局限性:这是一项非盲法试验。结论:在本试验中,基于智能手机的监测和治疗对主要或次要结局没有正面或负面影响。临床试验注册:nct04230421。2020年1月注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bipolar Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It publishes contributions from the broad range of clinical, psychological and biological research in bipolar disorders. It is the official journal of the ECNP-ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centres ) Bipolar Disorders Network, the International Group for the study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLi) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) and invites clinicians and researchers from around the globe to submit original research papers, short research communications, reviews, guidelines, case reports and letters to the editor that help to enhance understanding of bipolar disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书