What is the prevalence of extra-articular and intra-articular magnetic resonance imaging findings in football players with and without hip and/or groin pain? A cross-sectional study of 166 football players.
Emma Buckthorpe, Joshua J Heerey, Tom Entwistle, Kay M Crossley, Alex Davies, Matthew G King, Mark J Scholes, Joanne L Kemp
{"title":"What is the prevalence of extra-articular and intra-articular magnetic resonance imaging findings in football players with and without hip and/or groin pain? A cross-sectional study of 166 football players.","authors":"Emma Buckthorpe, Joshua J Heerey, Tom Entwistle, Kay M Crossley, Alex Davies, Matthew G King, Mark J Scholes, Joanne L Kemp","doi":"10.1177/11207000261416847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of MRI findings in football players with and without hip and/or groin pain (HGP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We described the prevalence of extra-articular findings (including gluteal, hamstring, iliopsoas, rectus femoris; pubic) and intra-articular (including labral, cartilage, bone marrow oedema, subchondral and paralabral cysts, ligamentum teres) findings on MRI for 215 eligible hips with HGP (132 participants) and 68 eligible asymptomatic hips (34 participants). Imaging of the hip joint included radiographs and a non-contrast 3.0 Tesla MRI, performed at a single imaging centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between groups for prevalence of any extra-articular or intra-articular findings. Pubic (75-85%), labral (70-78%) and chondral (54-60%) findings were most common. ⅓ of hips demonstrated all 3 findings regardless of symptoms (33.5% in HGP group and 35.5% in control group). 96.7% of HGP participants and 95.6% of control participants had at least 1 finding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that prevalence of extra- and intra-articular hip MRI findings did not differ between football players with and without HGP. Football players with and without pain were likely to have multiple imaging findings in 1 hip. A thorough history and clinical examination should be used to contextualise any imaging findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000261416847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000261416847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The primary aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of MRI findings in football players with and without hip and/or groin pain (HGP).
Methods: We described the prevalence of extra-articular findings (including gluteal, hamstring, iliopsoas, rectus femoris; pubic) and intra-articular (including labral, cartilage, bone marrow oedema, subchondral and paralabral cysts, ligamentum teres) findings on MRI for 215 eligible hips with HGP (132 participants) and 68 eligible asymptomatic hips (34 participants). Imaging of the hip joint included radiographs and a non-contrast 3.0 Tesla MRI, performed at a single imaging centre.
Results: There was no difference between groups for prevalence of any extra-articular or intra-articular findings. Pubic (75-85%), labral (70-78%) and chondral (54-60%) findings were most common. ⅓ of hips demonstrated all 3 findings regardless of symptoms (33.5% in HGP group and 35.5% in control group). 96.7% of HGP participants and 95.6% of control participants had at least 1 finding.
Conclusions: Our study found that prevalence of extra- and intra-articular hip MRI findings did not differ between football players with and without HGP. Football players with and without pain were likely to have multiple imaging findings in 1 hip. A thorough history and clinical examination should be used to contextualise any imaging findings.
期刊介绍:
HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice.
The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit.
HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are:
• Biomaterials
• Biomechanics
• Conservative Hip Surgery
• Paediatrics
• Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty
• Traumatology