Proximal hamstring reconstruction with a semitendinosus tendon allograft exhibits superior time-zero biomechanical properties compared to reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Haruki Nishimura, Shintaro Mukohara, Kiminari Kataoka, Justin F M Hollenbeck, Amelia H Drumm, Natalie Cortes, Wyatt H Buchalter, Soshi Uchida, Marc J Philippon
{"title":"Proximal hamstring reconstruction with a semitendinosus tendon allograft exhibits superior time-zero biomechanical properties compared to reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft.","authors":"Haruki Nishimura, Shintaro Mukohara, Kiminari Kataoka, Justin F M Hollenbeck, Amelia H Drumm, Natalie Cortes, Wyatt H Buchalter, Soshi Uchida, Marc J Philippon","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.153.BJR-2025-0231.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Chronic proximal hamstring tendon injuries sometimes require surgical reconstruction using a certain type of tendon graft. Although a distal hamstring and an Achilles tendon are the previously reported allograft options for this procedure, it remains unclear which allograft has superior biomechanical properties. The objective is to biomechanically compare the failure load, elongation at failure, and stiffness of proximal hamstring reconstruction techniques, using a semitendinosus tendon allograft and an Achilles tendon allograft. We hypothesized that the reconstruction, using a semitendinosus tendon allograft, would result in superior biomechanical properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric hemipelvises were obtained, along with Achilles tendon and semitendinosus allografts. Specimens first underwent non-destructive native-state testing to determine linear stiffness. Within each pair, specimens were randomly assigned to reconstruction with either an Achilles tendon or a semitendinosus allograft. Following repair, the specimens underwent uniaxial tension testing consisting of a preconditioning phase and pull-to-failure testing to determine failure load, elongation at failure, stiffness, and mode of failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Achilles tendon allograft group failed at a significantly lower mean load than the semitendinosus group (213 N (SD 48) vs 366 N (SD 85); p = 0.005). Failure in the Achilles group occurred exclusively via suture pullout at the proximal end of the graft. Repairs with semitendinosus grafts most often failed by the same mechanism. Mean percent difference of native stiffness was significantly higher in the Achilles group compared to the semitendinosus group (34.4% (SD 14.1%) vs 13.1% (SD 6.4%); p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proximal hamstring reconstruction with a semitendinosus tendon allograft showed higher failure load and better preservation of native stiffness compared to an Achilles tendon allograft using the techniques described in this study. While construct differences may contribute to this result, these findings support semitendinosus as the strongest allograft option for proximal hamstring reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"278-287"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13007266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.153.BJR-2025-0231.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Chronic proximal hamstring tendon injuries sometimes require surgical reconstruction using a certain type of tendon graft. Although a distal hamstring and an Achilles tendon are the previously reported allograft options for this procedure, it remains unclear which allograft has superior biomechanical properties. The objective is to biomechanically compare the failure load, elongation at failure, and stiffness of proximal hamstring reconstruction techniques, using a semitendinosus tendon allograft and an Achilles tendon allograft. We hypothesized that the reconstruction, using a semitendinosus tendon allograft, would result in superior biomechanical properties.

Methods: Eight pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric hemipelvises were obtained, along with Achilles tendon and semitendinosus allografts. Specimens first underwent non-destructive native-state testing to determine linear stiffness. Within each pair, specimens were randomly assigned to reconstruction with either an Achilles tendon or a semitendinosus allograft. Following repair, the specimens underwent uniaxial tension testing consisting of a preconditioning phase and pull-to-failure testing to determine failure load, elongation at failure, stiffness, and mode of failure.

Results: The Achilles tendon allograft group failed at a significantly lower mean load than the semitendinosus group (213 N (SD 48) vs 366 N (SD 85); p = 0.005). Failure in the Achilles group occurred exclusively via suture pullout at the proximal end of the graft. Repairs with semitendinosus grafts most often failed by the same mechanism. Mean percent difference of native stiffness was significantly higher in the Achilles group compared to the semitendinosus group (34.4% (SD 14.1%) vs 13.1% (SD 6.4%); p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Proximal hamstring reconstruction with a semitendinosus tendon allograft showed higher failure load and better preservation of native stiffness compared to an Achilles tendon allograft using the techniques described in this study. While construct differences may contribute to this result, these findings support semitendinosus as the strongest allograft option for proximal hamstring reconstruction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与跟腱异体移植重建相比,半腱肌腱异体移植重建近端腘绳肌表现出优越的零时间生物力学特性。
目的:慢性腘绳近端肌腱损伤有时需要使用某种类型的肌腱移植物进行手术重建。尽管先前报道的同种异体移植选择是远端腘绳肌和跟腱,但目前尚不清楚哪种同种异体移植具有更好的生物力学性能。目的是比较使用同种异体半腱肌腱和同种异体跟腱重建技术的失效负荷、失效伸长率和近端腘绳肌腱重建技术的刚度。我们假设使用同种异体半腱肌腱移植重建将产生优越的生物力学性能。方法:取8对新鲜冷冻的人尸体半骨盆,并移植跟腱和半腱。试样首先进行非破坏性的原生状态测试,以确定线性刚度。在每对标本中,随机分配用跟腱或半腱肌同种异体移植重建。修复后,试件进行单轴拉伸测试,包括预处理阶段和拉至失效测试,以确定失效载荷、失效伸长率、刚度和失效模式。结果:同种异体跟腱移植组失败的平均负荷明显低于半腱组(213 N (SD 48) vs 366 N (SD 85);P = 0.005)。跟腱组的失败只发生在移植物近端缝线拔出。半腱肌移植物的修复通常因相同的机制而失败。与半腱肌组相比,跟腱组天然僵硬度的平均百分比差异明显更高(34.4% (SD 14.1%) vs 13.1% (SD 6.4%);P = 0.003)。结论:与本研究中描述的同种异体跟腱移植相比,半腱肌腱同种异体跟腱移植重建近端腘绳肌具有更高的失效负荷和更好的原始刚度保存。虽然结构差异可能导致这一结果,但这些发现支持半腱肌作为近端腘绳肌重建的最强同种异体移植物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书