Machine learning in predicting treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.20524/aog.2026.1041
Sheza Malik, Renisha Redij, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Chengu Niu, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Machine learning in predicting treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Sheza Malik, Renisha Redij, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Chengu Niu, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.20524/aog.2026.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its unpredictable course have always been a challenge for gastroenterologists, with regard to predicting the disease response using endoscopic techniques. Machine learning (ML) models have shown some early promise in predicting treatment response in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating the application of ML to predict treatment response and remission in IBD patients. We used the CHARMS checklist for data extraction. Bias was assessed with the PROBAST tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included in our review 6 studies that evaluated numbers of IBD patients ranging from 67 to 3004. ML models demonstrated low to moderate predictive accuracy for treatment response and remission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.489-0.811; sensitivity: 0.46-0.96; specificity: 0.56-0.98). The studies that utilized ML models with more input variables performed better. Furthermore, only 2 studies performed external validation, and half of the studies demonstrated a substantial risk of bias due to missing data/overfitting, and variability in outcome definition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models show considerable promise in predicting treatment outcomes and remission in IBD. However, given the substantial bias in studies so far, future studies should use a standardized methodology, external validation, and an interpretable broader input variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"39 2","pages":"247-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13004820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2026.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The heterogeneity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its unpredictable course have always been a challenge for gastroenterologists, with regard to predicting the disease response using endoscopic techniques. Machine learning (ML) models have shown some early promise in predicting treatment response in IBD patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating the application of ML to predict treatment response and remission in IBD patients. We used the CHARMS checklist for data extraction. Bias was assessed with the PROBAST tool.

Results: We included in our review 6 studies that evaluated numbers of IBD patients ranging from 67 to 3004. ML models demonstrated low to moderate predictive accuracy for treatment response and remission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.489-0.811; sensitivity: 0.46-0.96; specificity: 0.56-0.98). The studies that utilized ML models with more input variables performed better. Furthermore, only 2 studies performed external validation, and half of the studies demonstrated a substantial risk of bias due to missing data/overfitting, and variability in outcome definition.

Conclusions: ML models show considerable promise in predicting treatment outcomes and remission in IBD. However, given the substantial bias in studies so far, future studies should use a standardized methodology, external validation, and an interpretable broader input variable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习预测炎症性肠病的治疗反应和缓解:系统综述。
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)的异质性及其不可预测的病程一直是胃肠病学家在使用内镜技术预测疾病反应方面面临的挑战。机器学习(ML)模型在预测IBD患者的治疗反应方面显示出一些早期的希望。方法:我们对应用ML预测IBD患者治疗反应和缓解的研究进行了系统回顾。我们使用了CHARMS检查表进行数据提取。使用PROBAST工具评估偏倚。结果:我们纳入了6项研究,评估了67至3004例IBD患者的数量。ML模型对治疗反应和缓解的预测准确度低至中等(受试者工作特征曲线下面积:0.489-0.811;敏感性:0.46-0.96;特异性:0.56-0.98)。使用具有更多输入变量的ML模型的研究表现更好。此外,只有2项研究进行了外部验证,其中一半的研究由于缺少数据/过拟合和结果定义的可变性而显示出很大的偏倚风险。结论:ML模型在预测IBD的治疗结果和缓解方面显示出相当大的希望。然而,鉴于到目前为止的研究存在大量偏差,未来的研究应该使用标准化的方法、外部验证和可解释的更广泛的输入变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书