Endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of gastric subepithelial lesions originating from the muscle layer: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 2.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-26 DOI:10.20524/aog.2026.1035
Stavros Dimitriadis, Stamatina Vogli, Gianluca Adrisani, George Tribonias, Domenico Galasso, Shaimaa Elkholy, Shivam Khare, Juliette Leroux, Harold Eduardo Benites Goñi, Stefan Seewald, Khanh Do-Cong Pham, Pedro Rosón Rodriguez, Ahmad Madkour, Sandro Sferrazza, Hany Shehab, Sridhar Sundaram, Mihai Ciocîrlan, Amr Fouly, Luis Marín Calderón, Paulo Bardalez Cruz, Hany Hagag, Mohamed El-Sherbiny, Kareem Essam, Rossella Maresca, Jijo Varghese, Federico Barbaro, Cristiano Spada, Matteo Marasco, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Maria Zachou, Georgios Mavrogenis
{"title":"Endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of gastric subepithelial lesions originating from the muscle layer: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Stavros Dimitriadis, Stamatina Vogli, Gianluca Adrisani, George Tribonias, Domenico Galasso, Shaimaa Elkholy, Shivam Khare, Juliette Leroux, Harold Eduardo Benites Goñi, Stefan Seewald, Khanh Do-Cong Pham, Pedro Rosón Rodriguez, Ahmad Madkour, Sandro Sferrazza, Hany Shehab, Sridhar Sundaram, Mihai Ciocîrlan, Amr Fouly, Luis Marín Calderón, Paulo Bardalez Cruz, Hany Hagag, Mohamed El-Sherbiny, Kareem Essam, Rossella Maresca, Jijo Varghese, Federico Barbaro, Cristiano Spada, Matteo Marasco, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Maria Zachou, Georgios Mavrogenis","doi":"10.20524/aog.2026.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) from the <i>muscularis propria</i> are usually managed surgically or with surveillance. Advances in endoscopic techniques now permit safe <i>en bloc</i> resection, even for lesions with extraluminal growth, but data from outside East Asia are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter retrospective study across 18 centers in Europe, the Middle East, South America and South Asia, including patients with gastric SELs from the <i>muscularis propria</i> resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) between 2017 and 2024. Outcomes included <i>en bloc</i> resection, safety, complications, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients (62.2% women; median age 59 years) were included. Median lesion size was 2cm (range 0.6-8). Lesions were located in the cardia (18.3%), fundus (18.3%), body (40.2%), and antrum (23.2%). Histology showed gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 78.0%, leiomyomas in 19.5%, and schwannomas in 2.5%. Most were endoluminal (80.5%), 19.5% were extraluminal, and 7.3% extended beyond the serosa. ESD was performed in 65.9% and STER in 34.1%. Median procedure time was 120 min. Deliberate perforation was performed in 31.7%, while 92.3% were managed endoscopically. <i>En bloc</i> resection was achieved in 96.3%, with defect closure in 90.2%. Complications occurred in 7%, with no mortality. Local relapse occurred in 2.5% after a median 9-month follow up. One-third of procedures took place in non-academic centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESD and STER are safe and effective alternatives to surgery or surveillance for gastric SELs from the <i>muscularis propria</i>, including lesions with extraluminal growth. Long-term, comparative studies alongside laparoscopic surgery are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"39 2","pages":"254-261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13004812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2026.1035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) from the muscularis propria are usually managed surgically or with surveillance. Advances in endoscopic techniques now permit safe en bloc resection, even for lesions with extraluminal growth, but data from outside East Asia are scarce.

Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study across 18 centers in Europe, the Middle East, South America and South Asia, including patients with gastric SELs from the muscularis propria resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) between 2017 and 2024. Outcomes included en bloc resection, safety, complications, and recurrence.

Results: Eighty-two patients (62.2% women; median age 59 years) were included. Median lesion size was 2cm (range 0.6-8). Lesions were located in the cardia (18.3%), fundus (18.3%), body (40.2%), and antrum (23.2%). Histology showed gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 78.0%, leiomyomas in 19.5%, and schwannomas in 2.5%. Most were endoluminal (80.5%), 19.5% were extraluminal, and 7.3% extended beyond the serosa. ESD was performed in 65.9% and STER in 34.1%. Median procedure time was 120 min. Deliberate perforation was performed in 31.7%, while 92.3% were managed endoscopically. En bloc resection was achieved in 96.3%, with defect closure in 90.2%. Complications occurred in 7%, with no mortality. Local relapse occurred in 2.5% after a median 9-month follow up. One-third of procedures took place in non-academic centers.

Conclusions: ESD and STER are safe and effective alternatives to surgery or surveillance for gastric SELs from the muscularis propria, including lesions with extraluminal growth. Long-term, comparative studies alongside laparoscopic surgery are warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜下粘膜剥离和粘膜下隧道内镜切除胃上皮下病变起源于肌肉层:一项多中心回顾性研究。
背景:胃上皮下病变(SELs)来自固有肌层通常是手术或监测处理。内镜技术的进步现在允许安全的整体切除,即使是腔外生长的病变,但来自东亚以外的数据很少。方法:我们在欧洲、中东、南美和南亚的18个中心进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,包括2017年至2024年间通过内镜粘膜下剥离(ESD)或粘膜下隧道内镜切除术(STER)切除胃固有肌层sel的患者。结果包括整体切除、安全性、并发症和复发率。结果:纳入82例患者(62.2%为女性,中位年龄59岁)。中位病灶大小为2cm(范围0.6-8)。病变位于贲门(18.3%)、眼底(18.3%)、体(40.2%)和上颌窦(23.2%)。组织学显示胃肠道间质瘤占78.0%,平滑肌瘤占19.5%,神经鞘瘤占2.5%。大多数为腔内(80.5%),19.5%为腔外,7.3%扩展到浆膜以外。ESD占65.9%,STER占34.1%。中位手术时间为120分钟。31.7%为故意穿孔,92.3%为内镜下穿孔。整体切除率为96.3%,缺损闭合率为90.2%。并发症发生率为7%,无死亡。中位随访9个月后局部复发率为2.5%。三分之一的手术在非学术中心进行。结论:对于来自固有肌层(包括腔外生长病变)的胃sel, ESD和STER是安全有效的替代手术或监测的方法。与腹腔镜手术进行长期的比较研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书