Diffusion-weighted imaging increases the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing rectal cancer T stage and reduces intra- and interobserver variability.

IF 2.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.20524/aog.2026.1038
Alfredo Clemente, Fabrizio Urraro, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Filippo Carannante, Fiammetta Cappabianca, Alessandro Costa, Valerio Nardone, Gianluca Costa, Alfonso Reginelli
{"title":"Diffusion-weighted imaging increases the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing rectal cancer T stage and reduces intra- and interobserver variability.","authors":"Alfredo Clemente, Fabrizio Urraro, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Filippo Carannante, Fiammetta Cappabianca, Alessandro Costa, Valerio Nardone, Gianluca Costa, Alfonso Reginelli","doi":"10.20524/aog.2026.1038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate preoperative staging is pivotal in guiding rectal cancer treatment, and in particular for selecting appropriate neoadjuvant therapies and surgical approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard modality for local staging. However, it has some limitations, particularly in tumors at intermediate clinical stages. Recent evidence has shown that incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can improve diagnostic performance, although its role in T staging has not been completely elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The diagnostic performance of conventional MRI alone vs. MRI plus DWI in rectal cancer staging was retrospectively evaluated. The correlation between preoperative MRI findings and postoperative histopathological staging was examined. Intra- and interobserver agreement among radiologists with various levels of experience were assessed, both with and without DWI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DWI-MRI improved staging accuracy, particularly for T2 and T3 tumors. The sensitivity and specificity for T2 staging increased from 68% and 96% (MRI alone) to 91% and 98% (DWI-MRI), respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity for T3 staging improved from 91% to 97%, and from 78% to 92%, respectively. The intraobserver agreement increased from 90.60% to 94.02% in experienced readers, and from 81.2% to 87.18% in less experienced ones. The interobserver agreement for DWI-MRI increased from 83.76% to 88.03%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DWI-MRI can enhance the accuracy of rectal cancer T staging, particularly when assessing rectal wall invasion, and it reduces overstaging. Moreover, it improves diagnostic consistency among radiologists, regardless of experience. Hence, the routine integration of DWI into preoperative MRI protocols can optimize clinical decision-making and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"39 2","pages":"270-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13004817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2026.1038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate preoperative staging is pivotal in guiding rectal cancer treatment, and in particular for selecting appropriate neoadjuvant therapies and surgical approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard modality for local staging. However, it has some limitations, particularly in tumors at intermediate clinical stages. Recent evidence has shown that incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can improve diagnostic performance, although its role in T staging has not been completely elucidated.

Methods: The diagnostic performance of conventional MRI alone vs. MRI plus DWI in rectal cancer staging was retrospectively evaluated. The correlation between preoperative MRI findings and postoperative histopathological staging was examined. Intra- and interobserver agreement among radiologists with various levels of experience were assessed, both with and without DWI.

Results: DWI-MRI improved staging accuracy, particularly for T2 and T3 tumors. The sensitivity and specificity for T2 staging increased from 68% and 96% (MRI alone) to 91% and 98% (DWI-MRI), respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity for T3 staging improved from 91% to 97%, and from 78% to 92%, respectively. The intraobserver agreement increased from 90.60% to 94.02% in experienced readers, and from 81.2% to 87.18% in less experienced ones. The interobserver agreement for DWI-MRI increased from 83.76% to 88.03%.

Conclusions: DWI-MRI can enhance the accuracy of rectal cancer T staging, particularly when assessing rectal wall invasion, and it reduces overstaging. Moreover, it improves diagnostic consistency among radiologists, regardless of experience. Hence, the routine integration of DWI into preoperative MRI protocols can optimize clinical decision-making and treatment planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

扩散加权成像提高了磁共振成像在评估直肠癌T期的诊断性能,减少了观察者内部和观察者之间的差异。
背景:准确的术前分期是指导直肠癌治疗的关键,特别是选择合适的新辅助治疗和手术入路。磁共振成像(MRI)仍然是局部分期的标准方式。然而,它也有一定的局限性,特别是对处于中期临床阶段的肿瘤。最近的证据表明,结合弥散加权成像(DWI)可以提高诊断性能,尽管其在T分期中的作用尚未完全阐明。方法:回顾性评价常规MRI与MRI + DWI对直肠癌分期的诊断价值。检查术前MRI表现与术后组织病理学分期的相关性。在有或没有DWI的情况下,评估了具有不同经验水平的放射科医生之间的内部和观察员之间的协议。结果:DWI-MRI提高了分期准确性,特别是T2和T3肿瘤。T2分期的敏感性和特异性分别从单独MRI的68%和96%提高到DWI-MRI的91%和98%,T3分期的敏感性和特异性分别从91%和97%提高到78%和92%。在经验丰富的读者中,内部观察者的一致性从90.60%增加到94.02%,在经验不足的读者中,一致性从81.2%增加到87.18%。DWI-MRI的观察者间一致性从83.76%提高到88.03%。结论:DWI-MRI可提高直肠癌T分期的准确性,特别是在评估直肠壁侵犯时,并可减少过分期。此外,它提高了放射科医生的诊断一致性,无论经验如何。因此,常规将DWI纳入术前MRI方案可以优化临床决策和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书