CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [18F]FDG-PET/MRI.

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging Pub Date : 2026-02-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/RSDQ2273
Shashi B Singh, Yashas Ullas Lokesha, Hongzhi Wang, Michael Joseph Barrow, Ricarda von Kruechten, Iryna Vasyliv, Amir Hossein Sarrami, Joy Tzung-Yu Wu, Lucia Baratto, Lisa Christine Adams, Hyun Gi Kim, Jason Wong, Tie Liang, Sergios Gatidis, Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood, Heike E Daldrup-Link
{"title":"CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/MRI.","authors":"Shashi B Singh, Yashas Ullas Lokesha, Hongzhi Wang, Michael Joseph Barrow, Ricarda von Kruechten, Iryna Vasyliv, Amir Hossein Sarrami, Joy Tzung-Yu Wu, Lucia Baratto, Lisa Christine Adams, Hyun Gi Kim, Jason Wong, Tie Liang, Sergios Gatidis, Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood, Heike E Daldrup-Link","doi":"10.62347/RSDQ2273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We assessed the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting pediatric lymphoma lesions on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/MRI. We evaluated CNN's sensitivity, specificity, percentage agreement, and processing time compared to the interpretations of a pediatric radiologist and a second-year radiology resident. In this retrospective study, a CNN was trained on annotated [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/MRI scans from 53 pediatric lymphoma patients and tested on 30 additional scans. The CNN and two human readers recorded the presence of lesions in five anatomical regions. An additional pediatric radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician determined the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the CNN were compared with those of human readers using the McNemar test, and the detection time of the CNN and human readers was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The CNN demonstrated higher sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (93.7%) than the radiology resident (69.2%, P=0.023; 81.5%, P<0.001), but lower than the pediatric radiologist (98.7%, P<0.001; 99.5%, P<0.001). The CNN achieved 83% agreement with the reference standard (95% CI: 79%-87%), higher than the resident's 63% (95% CI: 59%-69%) but lower than the pediatric radiologist's 94% (95% CI: 92%-97%). The median values and interquartile ranges for the time taken (in minutes) were 4 (3, 5) for the CNN, 8 (7, 10) for the pediatric radiologist, and 15 (9, 20) for the radiology resident. The sensitivity, specificity, and percentage agreement of the CNN were higher than those of a radiology resident but lower than those of a pediatric radiologist. The CNN readout was significantly faster compared to both human readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7572,"journal":{"name":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13003233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/RSDQ2273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assessed the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting pediatric lymphoma lesions on [18F]FDG-PET/MRI. We evaluated CNN's sensitivity, specificity, percentage agreement, and processing time compared to the interpretations of a pediatric radiologist and a second-year radiology resident. In this retrospective study, a CNN was trained on annotated [18F]FDG-PET/MRI scans from 53 pediatric lymphoma patients and tested on 30 additional scans. The CNN and two human readers recorded the presence of lesions in five anatomical regions. An additional pediatric radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician determined the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the CNN were compared with those of human readers using the McNemar test, and the detection time of the CNN and human readers was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The CNN demonstrated higher sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (93.7%) than the radiology resident (69.2%, P=0.023; 81.5%, P<0.001), but lower than the pediatric radiologist (98.7%, P<0.001; 99.5%, P<0.001). The CNN achieved 83% agreement with the reference standard (95% CI: 79%-87%), higher than the resident's 63% (95% CI: 59%-69%) but lower than the pediatric radiologist's 94% (95% CI: 92%-97%). The median values and interquartile ranges for the time taken (in minutes) were 4 (3, 5) for the CNN, 8 (7, 10) for the pediatric radiologist, and 15 (9, 20) for the radiology resident. The sensitivity, specificity, and percentage agreement of the CNN were higher than those of a radiology resident but lower than those of a pediatric radiologist. The CNN readout was significantly faster compared to both human readers.

基于cnn的小儿全身淋巴瘤检测[18F]FDG-PET/MRI。
我们评估了深度卷积神经网络(CNN)在[18F]FDG-PET/MRI上检测儿童淋巴瘤病变的性能。我们评估了CNN的敏感性、特异性、一致性百分比和处理时间,并将其与儿科放射科医生和二年级放射科住院医师的解释进行了比较。在这项回顾性研究中,CNN在53名儿童淋巴瘤患者的带注释的[18F]FDG-PET/MRI扫描上进行训练,并在另外30次扫描上进行测试。CNN和两名人类读者记录了五个解剖区域的病变存在。另外一名儿科放射科医生和一名核医学医生确定了参考标准。采用McNemar检验比较CNN与人类读者的敏感性和特异性,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较CNN与人类读者的检测时间。CNN的敏感性(84.6%)和特异性(93.7%)高于放射科住院医师(69.2%,P=0.023; 81.5%, P=0.023)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
4.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The scope of AJNMMI encompasses all areas of molecular imaging, including but not limited to: positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), molecular magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, optical bioluminescence, optical fluorescence, targeted ultrasound, photoacoustic imaging, etc. AJNMMI welcomes original and review articles on both clinical investigation and preclinical research. Occasionally, special topic issues, short communications, editorials, and invited perspectives will also be published. Manuscripts, including figures and tables, must be original and not under consideration by another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书