Evaluation of Microwave Thermotherapy Versus Intralesional Antimonial in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-23 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000437
Masoud Maleki, Naeemeh Ebrahimabadi, Vahid Mashayekhi Goyonlo, Bita Kiafar, Masoumeh Hosseininezhad, Negar Morovatdar, Hossein Hasanabadi, Seyedeh Zahra Ghasemi
{"title":"Evaluation of Microwave Thermotherapy Versus Intralesional Antimonial in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Masoud Maleki, Naeemeh Ebrahimabadi, Vahid Mashayekhi Goyonlo, Bita Kiafar, Masoumeh Hosseininezhad, Negar Morovatdar, Hossein Hasanabadi, Seyedeh Zahra Ghasemi","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a need for safer and more efficient therapies for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). This study evaluates the effectiveness of thermotherapy using microwave in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis alongside intralesional meglumine antimoniate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study was conducted among 40 patients with CL using a randomized controlled methodology. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either microwave thermotherapy (intervention; N=20) twice a week or intralesional meglumine antimoniate therapy weekly (control; N=20). The size of the induration of lesions was assessed at the starting point and at 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. A significance level of P <.05 was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of lesions was 55. The rate of complete recovery after 1 year was 55.2% in the intervention group and 76.9% in the control group. There was no statistically significant variation in the remission distribution comparing either of the groups ( P =.155). The complications in the intervention group were markedly reduced compared with the control group ( P =.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microwave thermotherapy is an efficient and innovative treatment for CL that does not have any adverse effects. This method can be used as an alternative therapy in certain areas and with certain patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"216-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is a need for safer and more efficient therapies for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). This study evaluates the effectiveness of thermotherapy using microwave in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis alongside intralesional meglumine antimoniate.

Methods: This pilot study was conducted among 40 patients with CL using a randomized controlled methodology. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either microwave thermotherapy (intervention; N=20) twice a week or intralesional meglumine antimoniate therapy weekly (control; N=20). The size of the induration of lesions was assessed at the starting point and at 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. A significance level of P <.05 was determined.

Results: The total number of lesions was 55. The rate of complete recovery after 1 year was 55.2% in the intervention group and 76.9% in the control group. There was no statistically significant variation in the remission distribution comparing either of the groups ( P =.155). The complications in the intervention group were markedly reduced compared with the control group ( P =.027).

Conclusions: Microwave thermotherapy is an efficient and innovative treatment for CL that does not have any adverse effects. This method can be used as an alternative therapy in certain areas and with certain patients.

评价微波热疗法与局灶内注射锑治疗皮肤利什曼病:一项随机临床试验。
目的:寻找更安全、更有效的治疗皮肤利什曼病的方法。本研究评估了微波热疗法在皮肤利什曼病治疗中的效果。方法:本初步研究采用随机对照方法,在40例CL患者中进行。参与者被随机分配接受每周一次的微波热疗法(干预,N=20)或每周一次的局部注射锑酸镁治疗(对照组,N=20)。在治疗起始点和治疗后2、3、6和12个月评估病变硬化的大小。结果:病变总数为55个。干预组1年后完全康复率为55.2%,对照组为76.9%。两组患者的缓解分布差异无统计学意义(P= 0.155)。干预组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P= 0.027)。结论:微波热疗是治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病的一种有效、创新的治疗方法,无不良反应。这种方法可以作为一种替代疗法,在某些地区和某些患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书