Mental Health Predictors of Adolescents' Social Media Engagement and Digital Addiction: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution Model Approach.

IF 4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Catalina Maria Popoviciu,Cezar Giosan
{"title":"Mental Health Predictors of Adolescents' Social Media Engagement and Digital Addiction: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution Model Approach.","authors":"Catalina Maria Popoviciu,Cezar Giosan","doi":"10.1177/21522715261434383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescents' pervasive social media use raises growing concerns about its complex links with mental health, yet predictors distinguishing normative engagement from maladaptive digital addiction remain insufficiently understood. Guided by the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model, this study examined whether mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, ADHD, post-traumatic stress symptoms, eating disorder symptoms) and social factors (bullying, help-seeking attitudes, stigma, social support) differentially predicted social media engagement and digital addiction. In a cross-sectional sample of 524 adolescents (51.0 percent female; aged 15-19 years, M = 17.95, SD = 0.91), hierarchical regression analyses with multiple imputation indicated that the full models explained 12.53 percent of the variance in social media engagement (R2 = 0.125) and 26.08 percent of the variance in digital addiction (R2 = 0.261). For social media engagement, higher general anxiety (β = 0.24, p = 0.040) and greater perceived social support (β = 0.13, p = 0.008) were significant positive predictors, while more favorable help-seeking attitudes were negatively associated with engagement (β = -0.10, p = 0.039). For digital addiction, perceived social support was a significant positive predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.002), while PTSS (β = 0.14, p = 0.058), bullying (β = 0.11, p = 0.055), and ADHD symptoms (β = 0.15, p = 0.092) showed trend-level associations; depressive symptoms were not significant in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.10, p = 0.317). Overall, findings provide partial support for the I-PACE model and suggest that trauma-related symptoms may warrant further investigation as a subclinical vulnerability associated with problematic digital behaviors.","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":"13 1","pages":"21522715261434383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21522715261434383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescents' pervasive social media use raises growing concerns about its complex links with mental health, yet predictors distinguishing normative engagement from maladaptive digital addiction remain insufficiently understood. Guided by the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model, this study examined whether mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, ADHD, post-traumatic stress symptoms, eating disorder symptoms) and social factors (bullying, help-seeking attitudes, stigma, social support) differentially predicted social media engagement and digital addiction. In a cross-sectional sample of 524 adolescents (51.0 percent female; aged 15-19 years, M = 17.95, SD = 0.91), hierarchical regression analyses with multiple imputation indicated that the full models explained 12.53 percent of the variance in social media engagement (R2 = 0.125) and 26.08 percent of the variance in digital addiction (R2 = 0.261). For social media engagement, higher general anxiety (β = 0.24, p = 0.040) and greater perceived social support (β = 0.13, p = 0.008) were significant positive predictors, while more favorable help-seeking attitudes were negatively associated with engagement (β = -0.10, p = 0.039). For digital addiction, perceived social support was a significant positive predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.002), while PTSS (β = 0.14, p = 0.058), bullying (β = 0.11, p = 0.055), and ADHD symptoms (β = 0.15, p = 0.092) showed trend-level associations; depressive symptoms were not significant in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.10, p = 0.317). Overall, findings provide partial support for the I-PACE model and suggest that trauma-related symptoms may warrant further investigation as a subclinical vulnerability associated with problematic digital behaviors.
青少年社交媒体参与和数字成瘾的心理健康预测因素:一个人-情感-认知-执行模型方法的相互作用。
青少年普遍使用社交媒体引发了人们对其与心理健康之间复杂联系的担忧,然而,区分规范参与和不适应数字成瘾的预测因素仍未得到充分理解。在人-情感-认知-执行互动(I-PACE)模型的指导下,本研究考察了心理健康症状(焦虑、抑郁、ADHD、创伤后应激症状、饮食失调症状)和社会因素(欺凌、寻求帮助的态度、污名化、社会支持)对社交媒体参与和数字成瘾的差异预测。在524名青少年(51.0%为女性,15-19岁,M = 17.95, SD = 0.91)的横截面样本中,多重归因的层次回归分析表明,完整的模型解释了12.53%的社交媒体参与方差(R2 = 0.125)和26.08%的数字成瘾方差(R2 = 0.261)。对于社交媒体参与,较高的总体焦虑(β = 0.24, p = 0.040)和较高的感知社会支持(β = 0.13, p = 0.008)是显著的正向预测因子,而更有利的求助态度与社交媒体参与呈负相关(β = -0.10, p = 0.039)。对于数字成瘾,感知到的社会支持是显著的正预测因子(β = 0.14, p = 0.002),而ptsd (β = 0.14, p = 0.058)、欺凌(β = 0.11, p = 0.055)和ADHD症状(β = 0.15, p = 0.092)呈趋势水平相关;在完全调整模型中,抑郁症状无显著性差异(β = 0.10, p = 0.317)。总的来说,研究结果为I-PACE模型提供了部分支持,并表明创伤相关症状可能值得进一步研究,因为它是与有问题的数字行为相关的亚临床脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书