Mental Health Predictors of Adolescents' Social Media Engagement and Digital Addiction: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution Model Approach.
{"title":"Mental Health Predictors of Adolescents' Social Media Engagement and Digital Addiction: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution Model Approach.","authors":"Catalina Maria Popoviciu,Cezar Giosan","doi":"10.1177/21522715261434383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescents' pervasive social media use raises growing concerns about its complex links with mental health, yet predictors distinguishing normative engagement from maladaptive digital addiction remain insufficiently understood. Guided by the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model, this study examined whether mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, ADHD, post-traumatic stress symptoms, eating disorder symptoms) and social factors (bullying, help-seeking attitudes, stigma, social support) differentially predicted social media engagement and digital addiction. In a cross-sectional sample of 524 adolescents (51.0 percent female; aged 15-19 years, M = 17.95, SD = 0.91), hierarchical regression analyses with multiple imputation indicated that the full models explained 12.53 percent of the variance in social media engagement (R2 = 0.125) and 26.08 percent of the variance in digital addiction (R2 = 0.261). For social media engagement, higher general anxiety (β = 0.24, p = 0.040) and greater perceived social support (β = 0.13, p = 0.008) were significant positive predictors, while more favorable help-seeking attitudes were negatively associated with engagement (β = -0.10, p = 0.039). For digital addiction, perceived social support was a significant positive predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.002), while PTSS (β = 0.14, p = 0.058), bullying (β = 0.11, p = 0.055), and ADHD symptoms (β = 0.15, p = 0.092) showed trend-level associations; depressive symptoms were not significant in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.10, p = 0.317). Overall, findings provide partial support for the I-PACE model and suggest that trauma-related symptoms may warrant further investigation as a subclinical vulnerability associated with problematic digital behaviors.","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":"13 1","pages":"21522715261434383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21522715261434383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adolescents' pervasive social media use raises growing concerns about its complex links with mental health, yet predictors distinguishing normative engagement from maladaptive digital addiction remain insufficiently understood. Guided by the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model, this study examined whether mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, ADHD, post-traumatic stress symptoms, eating disorder symptoms) and social factors (bullying, help-seeking attitudes, stigma, social support) differentially predicted social media engagement and digital addiction. In a cross-sectional sample of 524 adolescents (51.0 percent female; aged 15-19 years, M = 17.95, SD = 0.91), hierarchical regression analyses with multiple imputation indicated that the full models explained 12.53 percent of the variance in social media engagement (R2 = 0.125) and 26.08 percent of the variance in digital addiction (R2 = 0.261). For social media engagement, higher general anxiety (β = 0.24, p = 0.040) and greater perceived social support (β = 0.13, p = 0.008) were significant positive predictors, while more favorable help-seeking attitudes were negatively associated with engagement (β = -0.10, p = 0.039). For digital addiction, perceived social support was a significant positive predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.002), while PTSS (β = 0.14, p = 0.058), bullying (β = 0.11, p = 0.055), and ADHD symptoms (β = 0.15, p = 0.092) showed trend-level associations; depressive symptoms were not significant in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.10, p = 0.317). Overall, findings provide partial support for the I-PACE model and suggest that trauma-related symptoms may warrant further investigation as a subclinical vulnerability associated with problematic digital behaviors.
期刊介绍:
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms.
For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends.
The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.