Biomaterial used to counteract ridge reduction following the removal of adjacent teeth: A randomized controlled multicenter study

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of periodontology Pub Date : 2026-07-18 Epub Date: 2026-03-23 DOI:10.1002/jper.70084
Denis Cecchinato, Enrico Corrà, Eriberto Bressan, Marika Gervasi, Marco Menoncin, Enrico Savio, Marco Toia
{"title":"Biomaterial used to counteract ridge reduction following the removal of adjacent teeth: A randomized controlled multicenter study","authors":"Denis Cecchinato,&nbsp;Enrico Corrà,&nbsp;Eriberto Bressan,&nbsp;Marika Gervasi,&nbsp;Marco Menoncin,&nbsp;Enrico Savio,&nbsp;Marco Toia","doi":"10.1002/jper.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Alveolar ridge resorption (ARP) is a well-recognized consequence of tooth extraction, and multiple adjacent extractions may lead to greater ridge reduction than single-tooth extractions. This multicenter randomized controlled trial aimed to assess ridge remodeling after removing 2 adjacent teeth and whether socket grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral with collagen (DBBM-C) plus a collagen membrane could counteract the ridge reduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-two patients requiring 2 adjacent tooth extractions were randomly assigned to either Test (DBBM-C graft + collagen membrane) or Control (natural healing). Impressions were taken immediately after extraction and at 6 months, and models were analyzed to measure changes in horizontal ridge width (bucco-lingual at 3 mm below the crest) and vertical ridge height (buccal and lingual).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At 6 months, grafted sites had significantly less ridge reduction than controls. Horizontal ridge width reduction averaged 57.7% in Control versus 23.0% in Test (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Vertical height loss was also greater in controls (buccal 3.0 mm vs. 1.5 mm; lingual 2.2 mm vs. 1.3 mm; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Both mesial and distal sockets benefited similarly from grafting, with comparable preservation at each site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Filling adjacent extraction sockets with DBBM-C and covering with a collagen membrane significantly reduced horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge resorption compared to unassisted healing. This approach effectively preserves bone volume after multiple tooth extractions, which may facilitate later implant placement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain language summary</h3>\n \n <p>When 2 neighboring teeth are removed, the area tends to shrink in width and height as it heals. This bone loss can make it more difficult to place dental implants later. In this study, we tested a method to help maintain the bone after removing 2 adjacent teeth. In the Test group, the empty tooth sockets were filled with a bone graft material (deproteinized bovine bone mineral and collagen) and covered with a collagen membrane. In the Control group, the sites were left to heal physiologically. A total of 42 patients participated, each needing 2 side-by-side teeth removed. After 6 months of healing, we compared models of the patients from right after the extractions to those taken 6 months later. The results showed that the group with the bone graft and membrane had much less bone shrinkage than the group without them. The 2 extraction sites in the graft group maintained their bone height and width similarly. In summary, using a bone substitute material and membrane immediately after multiple tooth extractions helped preserve the jawbone, which could make future treatments like dental implants more successful.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"97 7","pages":"1481-1490"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jper.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jper.70084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Alveolar ridge resorption (ARP) is a well-recognized consequence of tooth extraction, and multiple adjacent extractions may lead to greater ridge reduction than single-tooth extractions. This multicenter randomized controlled trial aimed to assess ridge remodeling after removing 2 adjacent teeth and whether socket grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral with collagen (DBBM-C) plus a collagen membrane could counteract the ridge reduction.

Methods

Forty-two patients requiring 2 adjacent tooth extractions were randomly assigned to either Test (DBBM-C graft + collagen membrane) or Control (natural healing). Impressions were taken immediately after extraction and at 6 months, and models were analyzed to measure changes in horizontal ridge width (bucco-lingual at 3 mm below the crest) and vertical ridge height (buccal and lingual).

Results

At 6 months, grafted sites had significantly less ridge reduction than controls. Horizontal ridge width reduction averaged 57.7% in Control versus 23.0% in Test (p < 0.001). Vertical height loss was also greater in controls (buccal 3.0 mm vs. 1.5 mm; lingual 2.2 mm vs. 1.3 mm; p < 0.001). Both mesial and distal sockets benefited similarly from grafting, with comparable preservation at each site.

Conclusion

Filling adjacent extraction sockets with DBBM-C and covering with a collagen membrane significantly reduced horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge resorption compared to unassisted healing. This approach effectively preserves bone volume after multiple tooth extractions, which may facilitate later implant placement.

Plain language summary

When 2 neighboring teeth are removed, the area tends to shrink in width and height as it heals. This bone loss can make it more difficult to place dental implants later. In this study, we tested a method to help maintain the bone after removing 2 adjacent teeth. In the Test group, the empty tooth sockets were filled with a bone graft material (deproteinized bovine bone mineral and collagen) and covered with a collagen membrane. In the Control group, the sites were left to heal physiologically. A total of 42 patients participated, each needing 2 side-by-side teeth removed. After 6 months of healing, we compared models of the patients from right after the extractions to those taken 6 months later. The results showed that the group with the bone graft and membrane had much less bone shrinkage than the group without them. The 2 extraction sites in the graft group maintained their bone height and width similarly. In summary, using a bone substitute material and membrane immediately after multiple tooth extractions helped preserve the jawbone, which could make future treatments like dental implants more successful.

Abstract Image

生物材料用于抵消邻牙拔除后牙脊缩小:一项随机对照多中心研究。
牙槽嵴吸收(ARP)是拔牙的一个公认的结果,相邻的多次拔牙可能比单牙拔牙导致更大的牙槽嵴减少。本多中心随机对照试验旨在评估2颗相邻牙齿去除后牙脊重塑,以及用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质与胶原蛋白(DBBM-C)加胶原膜进行牙槽移植是否可以抵消牙脊缩小。方法将42例需要2次相邻拔牙的患者随机分为实验组(DBBM-C移植物+胶原膜)和对照组(自然愈合)。拔牙后和6个月时立即取印模,分析模型以测量水平脊宽(牙冠以下3mm处的颊-舌)和垂直脊高(颊和舌)的变化。结果6个月时,移植部位的嵴复位明显低于对照组。对照组水平脊宽平均减少57.7%,实验组平均减少23.0% (p < 0.001)。对照组的垂直高度损失也更大(颊部3.0 mm vs. 1.5 mm;舌部2.2 mm vs. 1.3 mm; p < 0.001)。近端和远端骨臼从移植中获益相似,在每个部位都有相当的保存。结论用DBBM-C填充邻近拔牙槽并覆盖胶原膜可显著减少水平和垂直牙槽嵴吸收。这种方法有效地保留了多次拔牙后的骨体积,有利于以后种植体的放置。当两颗相邻的牙齿被拔掉时,随着愈合,该区域的宽度和高度往往会缩小。这种骨质流失会使以后植入牙体变得更加困难。在这项研究中,我们测试了一种方法,以帮助维持两颗相邻的牙齿后的骨头。实验组用骨移植材料(脱蛋白牛骨矿物质和胶原蛋白)填充空牙槽,并覆盖胶原蛋白膜。在对照组中,留下这些部位进行生理愈合。共有42名患者参与,每人需要并排拔除2颗牙齿。愈合6个月后,我们比较了拔牙后和6个月后患者的模型。结果表明,植骨膜组骨收缩明显小于未植骨膜组。移植组2个拔牙部位骨高度和骨宽度保持相似。总之,在多次拔牙后立即使用骨替代材料和膜有助于保存颌骨,这可能使未来的治疗如植牙更成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书