A structured analysis of the concept of brain death.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s11017-026-09748-3
Rainer J Beckmann
{"title":"A structured analysis of the concept of brain death.","authors":"Rainer J Beckmann","doi":"10.1007/s11017-026-09748-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The tests and procedures used to determine death must be consistent with a coherent concept of death. This concept includes the subject of death, the definition of death, the sign/criterion of death, and the methods used to diagnose death. All four levels must logically build on one another. Additionally, any concept of death must align with the generally accepted meaning of the term \"death\" in everyday language. Judged by these standards, the current guidelines for determining death based on neurological criteria are not convincing: brain death does not indicate the disintegration of the human organism, and intensive care keeps patients alive and does not 'mask' death. Furthermore, 'permanent' loss of organ function can never reliably indicate death. Thus, the criterion and the definition of death do not match.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"231-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13102739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-026-09748-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tests and procedures used to determine death must be consistent with a coherent concept of death. This concept includes the subject of death, the definition of death, the sign/criterion of death, and the methods used to diagnose death. All four levels must logically build on one another. Additionally, any concept of death must align with the generally accepted meaning of the term "death" in everyday language. Judged by these standards, the current guidelines for determining death based on neurological criteria are not convincing: brain death does not indicate the disintegration of the human organism, and intensive care keeps patients alive and does not 'mask' death. Furthermore, 'permanent' loss of organ function can never reliably indicate death. Thus, the criterion and the definition of death do not match.

对脑死亡概念的结构化分析。
用于确定死亡的测试和程序必须符合连贯的死亡概念。这一概念包括死亡的主题、死亡的定义、死亡的标志/标准以及用于诊断死亡的方法。所有四个层次都必须在逻辑上相互建立。此外,任何关于死亡的概念都必须与日常语言中“死亡”一词的普遍含义保持一致。根据这些标准判断,目前根据神经学标准确定死亡的指导方针并不令人信服:脑死亡并不表明人体有机体的解体,重症监护使患者存活,而不是“掩盖”死亡。此外,器官功能的“永久性”丧失永远不能可靠地表明死亡。因此,这一标准与死亡的定义并不相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书