An Investigation of Family Functioning Among Caregiver-Adolescent Dyads Seeking Emergency Department Care for Adolescent Suicide Risk.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amanda Jiang, Nadia Al-Dajani, Valerie J Micol, Alejandra Arango, Cheryl A King, Cynthia Ewell Foster, Victor Hong, Ewa K Czyz
{"title":"An Investigation of Family Functioning Among Caregiver-Adolescent Dyads Seeking Emergency Department Care for Adolescent Suicide Risk.","authors":"Amanda Jiang, Nadia Al-Dajani, Valerie J Micol, Alejandra Arango, Cheryl A King, Cynthia Ewell Foster, Victor Hong, Ewa K Czyz","doi":"10.1007/s10802-026-01448-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rising adolescent suicide rates in the United States call for the identification of relevant risk and protective factors. Family dysfunction (FD) is consistently linked to adolescent mental health. Prior literature suggests that discrepancies in FD reports (e.g., caregivers vs. adolescents) could be a clinical indicator of adolescent mental health. However, there has been limited research examining multi-informant perspectives on FD within adolescent suicide literature, and no research has examined which contextual factors may be associated with discrepant reports of FD between adolescents at elevated suicide risk and their caregivers. This study addresses these gaps by examining FD among 116 caregiver-adolescent dyads (Mage = 15.29 (SDage =1.46); 65.5% female; 75.9% White) who sought emergency department (ED) services related to adolescent suicide risk. Cross-sectional findings revealed that caregiver-adolescent FD discrepancy was associated with greater adolescent self-rated suicide risk, depression, and anxiety. Similarly, adolescent-reported FD was associated with higher anxiety and depression, whereas caregiver-reported FD was not associated with adolescent mental health outcomes. Contextual factors such as lower caregiver stress, higher caregiver emotional support, and lower adolescent-perceived family relationship quality were associated with greater caregiver-adolescent FD discrepancies. It is possible that parents who receive additional emotional support and experience lower stress in their lives may perceive all areas of their lives, including their relationship with their teen, as improved – thereby amplifying discrepancies between parent and youth reports. Findings highlight the importance of understanding FD from multi-informant perspectives and suggest that improving family processes for adolescents at high-risk is an important treatment target.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-026-01448-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising adolescent suicide rates in the United States call for the identification of relevant risk and protective factors. Family dysfunction (FD) is consistently linked to adolescent mental health. Prior literature suggests that discrepancies in FD reports (e.g., caregivers vs. adolescents) could be a clinical indicator of adolescent mental health. However, there has been limited research examining multi-informant perspectives on FD within adolescent suicide literature, and no research has examined which contextual factors may be associated with discrepant reports of FD between adolescents at elevated suicide risk and their caregivers. This study addresses these gaps by examining FD among 116 caregiver-adolescent dyads (Mage = 15.29 (SDage =1.46); 65.5% female; 75.9% White) who sought emergency department (ED) services related to adolescent suicide risk. Cross-sectional findings revealed that caregiver-adolescent FD discrepancy was associated with greater adolescent self-rated suicide risk, depression, and anxiety. Similarly, adolescent-reported FD was associated with higher anxiety and depression, whereas caregiver-reported FD was not associated with adolescent mental health outcomes. Contextual factors such as lower caregiver stress, higher caregiver emotional support, and lower adolescent-perceived family relationship quality were associated with greater caregiver-adolescent FD discrepancies. It is possible that parents who receive additional emotional support and experience lower stress in their lives may perceive all areas of their lives, including their relationship with their teen, as improved – thereby amplifying discrepancies between parent and youth reports. Findings highlight the importance of understanding FD from multi-informant perspectives and suggest that improving family processes for adolescents at high-risk is an important treatment target.

因青少年自杀风险而寻求急诊科护理的照顾者-青少年夫妇的家庭功能调查。
美国不断上升的青少年自杀率要求识别相关的风险和保护因素。家庭功能障碍(FD)一直与青少年心理健康有关。先前的文献表明,FD报告的差异(例如,照顾者与青少年)可能是青少年心理健康的临床指标。然而,在青少年自杀文献中,关于FD的多信息者视角的研究有限,并且没有研究检查哪些背景因素可能与自杀风险高的青少年及其照顾者之间FD的差异报告相关。本研究通过检查116对照顾者-青少年的FD来解决这些差距(Mage = 15.29 (SDage =1.46);65.5%的女性;75.9%白人)寻求与青少年自杀风险相关的急诊部门(ED)服务。横断面研究结果显示,照顾者-青少年FD差异与较高的青少年自评自杀风险、抑郁和焦虑有关。同样,青少年报告的FD与较高的焦虑和抑郁有关,而照顾者报告的FD与青少年心理健康结果无关。环境因素,如较低的照顾者压力、较高的照顾者情感支持和较低的青少年感知的家庭关系质量与较大的照顾者-青少年FD差异有关。有可能那些在生活中获得额外情感支持和经历更少压力的父母会认为他们生活的各个方面,包括他们与孩子的关系,都得到了改善——从而放大了父母和孩子报告之间的差异。研究结果强调了从多信息提供者角度理解FD的重要性,并表明改善高危青少年的家庭流程是一个重要的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书