Hematuria-related readmission after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy.

IF 1.3 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1177/03915603261430487
Abdullah Ilktac, Bayram Dogan, Fatih Gevher, Muzaffer Akcay, Habib Akbulut, Yusuf O Ilbey
{"title":"Hematuria-related readmission after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy.","authors":"Abdullah Ilktac, Bayram Dogan, Fatih Gevher, Muzaffer Akcay, Habib Akbulut, Yusuf O Ilbey","doi":"10.1177/03915603261430487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Managing patients on antiplatelet (AP) therapy undergoing transurethral resection of bladder cancer (TURBT) is challenging due to bleeding and thromboembolic risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent TURBT between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients were divided into an AP group and a control group without AP therapy. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative parameters, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging, were evaluated. The primary endpoint was readmission due to hematuria within 30 days; secondary outcomes included rehospitalization, clot retention, and reoperation. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were included, with 40 in the AP group and 63 in the control group. Readmission with hematuria occurred in 10% of AP patients versus 6.3% of controls (<i>p</i> = 0.707). All readmissions in the AP group involved clopidogrel users, alone or with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), while none occurred in ASA-only users (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Rehospitalization was observed only in the AP group (7.5% vs 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.055). LMWH bridging (OR = 18.40, 95%CI = 2.93-115.40, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and clopidogrel use (OR = 10.88, 95% CI = 2.2851.94, <i>p</i> = 0.003) predicted readmission in univariable analysis but not multivariable models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative ASA monotherapy appears safe, while clopidogrel use may increase the risk of hematuria-related readmission and warrants closer monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"370-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603261430487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Managing patients on antiplatelet (AP) therapy undergoing transurethral resection of bladder cancer (TURBT) is challenging due to bleeding and thromboembolic risks.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent TURBT between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients were divided into an AP group and a control group without AP therapy. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative parameters, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging, were evaluated. The primary endpoint was readmission due to hematuria within 30 days; secondary outcomes included rehospitalization, clot retention, and reoperation. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of readmission.

Results: A total of 103 patients were included, with 40 in the AP group and 63 in the control group. Readmission with hematuria occurred in 10% of AP patients versus 6.3% of controls (p = 0.707). All readmissions in the AP group involved clopidogrel users, alone or with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), while none occurred in ASA-only users (p = 0.004). Rehospitalization was observed only in the AP group (7.5% vs 0%, p = 0.055). LMWH bridging (OR = 18.40, 95%CI = 2.93-115.40, p = 0.002) and clopidogrel use (OR = 10.88, 95% CI = 2.2851.94, p = 0.003) predicted readmission in univariable analysis but not multivariable models.

Conclusion: Perioperative ASA monotherapy appears safe, while clopidogrel use may increase the risk of hematuria-related readmission and warrants closer monitoring.

经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术后接受抗血小板治疗患者血尿相关再入院。
导言:由于出血和血栓栓塞风险,管理接受抗血小板(AP)治疗的经尿道膀胱癌切除术(TURBT)患者具有挑战性。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2024年12月期间接受TURBT治疗的患者。患者分为AP组和未进行AP治疗的对照组。评估人口统计学、围手术期和术后参数,包括低分子肝素(LMWH)桥接。主要终点是30天内因血尿再入院;次要结局包括再住院、血块保留和再手术。逻辑回归分析确定了再入院的预测因素。结果:共纳入103例患者,AP组40例,对照组63例。10%的AP患者再入院时伴有血尿,对照组为6.3% (p = 0.707)。AP组所有再入院患者均为氯吡格雷单独使用或与乙酰水杨酸(ASA)联合使用,而仅使用ASA的患者无再入院(p = 0.004)。只有AP组再次住院(7.5% vs 0%, p = 0.055)。低分子肝素桥接(OR = 18.40, 95%CI = 2.93-115.40, p = 0.002)和氯吡格雷使用(OR = 10.88, 95%CI = 2.2851.94, p = 0.003)在单变量分析中预测再入院,但在多变量模型中没有预测再入院。结论:围手术期ASA单药治疗是安全的,而氯吡格雷可能会增加血尿相关再入院的风险,需要更密切的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书