Imagery Rescripting induced transient forgetting of negative autobiographical memories.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Memory Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2026.2645634
Zekai Du, Chen Cheng, Mingfan Liu, Juan Niu
{"title":"Imagery Rescripting induced transient forgetting of negative autobiographical memories.","authors":"Zekai Du, Chen Cheng, Mingfan Liu, Juan Niu","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2026.2645634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) is a promising intervention for treating emotional disorders associated with distressing autobiographical memories, but its impact on memory recall requires further investigation. This study, based on the retrieval competition hypothesis, proposes a previously overlooked theoretical mechanism, that the process of creating and rehearsing therapeutic imagery in ImRs may require the inhibition of original negative memory representations, thereby reducing their availability. We therefore adapted the retrieval-practice paradigm and conducted two laboratory intervention studies. Experiment 1 (<i>n</i> = 60) examined the effects of ImRs and Imaginal Exposure (ImE) on the recall of original memories, while Experiment 2 (<i>n</i> = 32) explored the temporal boundary conditions of forgetting induced by ImRs intervention. Both experiments used negative autobiographical memories from healthy participants, collected phenomenological ratings (valence, vividness, arousal) before and after the intervention, and employed an extralist cuing strategy for recall testing to avoid the covert cuing strategy. Results indicated that in non-clinical samples, ImRs induced transient forgetting of intervened negative memories, but the recollection of these memories recovered after a 24-hour delay. Consequently, caution is warranted when extending this forgetting effect to clinical treatment protocols or forensic testimony settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"522-543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2645634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) is a promising intervention for treating emotional disorders associated with distressing autobiographical memories, but its impact on memory recall requires further investigation. This study, based on the retrieval competition hypothesis, proposes a previously overlooked theoretical mechanism, that the process of creating and rehearsing therapeutic imagery in ImRs may require the inhibition of original negative memory representations, thereby reducing their availability. We therefore adapted the retrieval-practice paradigm and conducted two laboratory intervention studies. Experiment 1 (n = 60) examined the effects of ImRs and Imaginal Exposure (ImE) on the recall of original memories, while Experiment 2 (n = 32) explored the temporal boundary conditions of forgetting induced by ImRs intervention. Both experiments used negative autobiographical memories from healthy participants, collected phenomenological ratings (valence, vividness, arousal) before and after the intervention, and employed an extralist cuing strategy for recall testing to avoid the covert cuing strategy. Results indicated that in non-clinical samples, ImRs induced transient forgetting of intervened negative memories, but the recollection of these memories recovered after a 24-hour delay. Consequently, caution is warranted when extending this forgetting effect to clinical treatment protocols or forensic testimony settings.

意象重写诱发消极自传体记忆的短暂遗忘。
意象重塑(ImRs)是治疗痛苦自传体记忆相关情绪障碍的一种有前景的干预手段,但其对记忆回忆的影响有待进一步研究。本研究基于检索竞争假说,提出了一个之前被忽视的理论机制,即在imr中创造和排演治疗意象的过程可能需要抑制原始负面记忆表征,从而降低其可用性。因此,我们采用了检索-实践范式,并进行了两项实验室干预研究。实验1 (n = 60)考察了ImRs和imme对原始记忆回忆的影响,实验2 (n = 32)考察了ImRs干预诱导遗忘的时间边界条件。两个实验均使用健康参与者的负面自传体记忆,收集干预前后的现象学评分(效价、生动度、唤醒),并采用外显提示策略进行回忆测试,以避免隐蔽提示策略。结果表明,在非临床样本中,ImRs诱导了被干预的负面记忆的短暂遗忘,但这些记忆的回忆在24小时后恢复。因此,在将这种遗忘效应扩展到临床治疗方案或法医证词设置时,需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书