{"title":"Imagery Rescripting induced transient forgetting of negative autobiographical memories.","authors":"Zekai Du, Chen Cheng, Mingfan Liu, Juan Niu","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2026.2645634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) is a promising intervention for treating emotional disorders associated with distressing autobiographical memories, but its impact on memory recall requires further investigation. This study, based on the retrieval competition hypothesis, proposes a previously overlooked theoretical mechanism, that the process of creating and rehearsing therapeutic imagery in ImRs may require the inhibition of original negative memory representations, thereby reducing their availability. We therefore adapted the retrieval-practice paradigm and conducted two laboratory intervention studies. Experiment 1 (<i>n</i> = 60) examined the effects of ImRs and Imaginal Exposure (ImE) on the recall of original memories, while Experiment 2 (<i>n</i> = 32) explored the temporal boundary conditions of forgetting induced by ImRs intervention. Both experiments used negative autobiographical memories from healthy participants, collected phenomenological ratings (valence, vividness, arousal) before and after the intervention, and employed an extralist cuing strategy for recall testing to avoid the covert cuing strategy. Results indicated that in non-clinical samples, ImRs induced transient forgetting of intervened negative memories, but the recollection of these memories recovered after a 24-hour delay. Consequently, caution is warranted when extending this forgetting effect to clinical treatment protocols or forensic testimony settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"522-543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2645634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) is a promising intervention for treating emotional disorders associated with distressing autobiographical memories, but its impact on memory recall requires further investigation. This study, based on the retrieval competition hypothesis, proposes a previously overlooked theoretical mechanism, that the process of creating and rehearsing therapeutic imagery in ImRs may require the inhibition of original negative memory representations, thereby reducing their availability. We therefore adapted the retrieval-practice paradigm and conducted two laboratory intervention studies. Experiment 1 (n = 60) examined the effects of ImRs and Imaginal Exposure (ImE) on the recall of original memories, while Experiment 2 (n = 32) explored the temporal boundary conditions of forgetting induced by ImRs intervention. Both experiments used negative autobiographical memories from healthy participants, collected phenomenological ratings (valence, vividness, arousal) before and after the intervention, and employed an extralist cuing strategy for recall testing to avoid the covert cuing strategy. Results indicated that in non-clinical samples, ImRs induced transient forgetting of intervened negative memories, but the recollection of these memories recovered after a 24-hour delay. Consequently, caution is warranted when extending this forgetting effect to clinical treatment protocols or forensic testimony settings.
期刊介绍:
Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.