A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Isabelle Munyangaju, Lucía Carratalà-Castro, Dulce Osório, Jacob Bigio, Kondwelani John Mateyo, Bryan J Vonasek, Danilo Buonsenso, Quique Bassat, Xavier Serres-Créixams, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Alberto Garcia-Basteiro, Madhukar Pai, Elisa Lopez-Varela
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis.","authors":"Isabelle Munyangaju, Lucía Carratalà-Castro, Dulce Osório, Jacob Bigio, Kondwelani John Mateyo, Bryan J Vonasek, Danilo Buonsenso, Quique Bassat, Xavier Serres-Créixams, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Alberto Garcia-Basteiro, Madhukar Pai, Elisa Lopez-Varela","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmag021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) in children is challenging due to non-specific symptoms, paucibacillary disease, and difficulty producing sputum. Chest X-rays (CXRs), though widely used, are often inaccessible in low-resource settings and involve radiation. Ultrasound (US) is a radiation-free, portable, and potentially low-cost alternative that can detect pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB features. However, its diagnostic accuracy in paediatric TB remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed US diagnostic performance for paediatric TB across anatomical sites. Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we searched five databases through May 2025. Studies were included if they involved children under 15 with presumptive TB and reported US diagnostic accuracy data. Data extraction, quality assessment (QUADAS-2), and meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model were conducted. Graham's TB classification served as the reference standard. CXR was used as a comparator where available, with agreement assessed via Cohen's kappa. Of 17 019 records, 7 studies involving 945 children met inclusion criteria. Pooled US sensitivity was 52% (95% CI: 46-58%), and specificity was 76% (95% CI: 67-83%). US showed high specificity but low sensitivity across most features, including abdominal lymphadenopathy and pericardial effusion; pleural effusion had slightly higher sensitivity (18%). Agreement with CXR was moderate (kappa 0.24-0.42). Variability in US protocols, operator skills, and reference standards limited generalizability. Only one study had low risk of bias across all QUADAS-2 domains. US is a promising adjunct for paediatric TB diagnosis in resource-limited settings, but standardization and validation are needed to improve its standalone utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmag021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) in children is challenging due to non-specific symptoms, paucibacillary disease, and difficulty producing sputum. Chest X-rays (CXRs), though widely used, are often inaccessible in low-resource settings and involve radiation. Ultrasound (US) is a radiation-free, portable, and potentially low-cost alternative that can detect pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB features. However, its diagnostic accuracy in paediatric TB remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed US diagnostic performance for paediatric TB across anatomical sites. Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we searched five databases through May 2025. Studies were included if they involved children under 15 with presumptive TB and reported US diagnostic accuracy data. Data extraction, quality assessment (QUADAS-2), and meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model were conducted. Graham's TB classification served as the reference standard. CXR was used as a comparator where available, with agreement assessed via Cohen's kappa. Of 17 019 records, 7 studies involving 945 children met inclusion criteria. Pooled US sensitivity was 52% (95% CI: 46-58%), and specificity was 76% (95% CI: 67-83%). US showed high specificity but low sensitivity across most features, including abdominal lymphadenopathy and pericardial effusion; pleural effusion had slightly higher sensitivity (18%). Agreement with CXR was moderate (kappa 0.24-0.42). Variability in US protocols, operator skills, and reference standards limited generalizability. Only one study had low risk of bias across all QUADAS-2 domains. US is a promising adjunct for paediatric TB diagnosis in resource-limited settings, but standardization and validation are needed to improve its standalone utility.

超声诊断小儿结核诊断准确性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
由于非特异性症状、少菌性疾病和产痰困难,儿童结核病的诊断具有挑战性。胸部x光(cxr)虽然被广泛使用,但在资源匮乏的环境中往往无法获得,并且涉及辐射。超声(US)是一种无辐射、便携、潜在低成本的替代方法,可以检测肺部和肺外结核的特征。然而,其在儿科结核病诊断中的准确性仍不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了美国对跨解剖部位儿科结核病的诊断表现。根据PRISMA-DTA指南,我们检索了截至2025年5月的5个数据库。如果研究涉及15岁以下推定患有结核病的儿童,并报告了美国诊断准确性数据,则纳入研究。采用双变量随机效应模型进行数据提取、质量评估(QUADAS-2)和荟萃分析。Graham的结核病分类作为参考标准。在可用的情况下,使用CXR作为比较指标,并通过Cohen's kappa评估一致性。在17019份记录中,7项涉及945名儿童的研究符合纳入标准。合并美国敏感性为52% (95% CI: 46-58%),特异性为76% (95% CI: 67-83%)。US对大多数特征显示高特异性但低敏感性,包括腹部淋巴结病和心包积液;胸腔积液的敏感性略高(18%)。与CXR的一致性中等(kappa 0.24-0.42)。美国协议、操作人员技能和参考标准的可变性限制了通用性。只有一项研究在所有QUADAS-2领域具有低偏倚风险。在资源有限的情况下,US是一种很有前途的儿科结核病诊断辅助手段,但需要标准化和验证以提高其独立效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书