Comparative Effectiveness of Ivabradine Versus Digoxin in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study.
Jheng-Yan Wu, Keng-Wei Lee, Sheng-Chi Huang, Hsuan-Yuan Chang, Yu-Min Lin
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Ivabradine Versus Digoxin in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Jheng-Yan Wu, Keng-Wei Lee, Sheng-Chi Huang, Hsuan-Yuan Chang, Yu-Min Lin","doi":"10.1159/000551617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD), conferring a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ivabradine and digoxin are both used for heart rate control in HFrEF, but their comparative effectiveness in patients with CKD remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart failure exacerbation (HFE) and all-cause mortality, between ivabradine and digoxin in patients with concomitant HFrEF and CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with HFrEF and CKD between 2015 and 2025. Patients prescribed ivabradine were propensity-score-matched 1:1 to those receiving digoxin based on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and medication variables. The primary outcome was MACE (composite of HFE or all-cause mortality). Secondary outcomes included each component separately. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 3,140 patients were included (1,570 per group). Ivabradine use was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared with digoxin (26.8% vs 31.6%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90; p<0.001). Ivabradine also reduced the risk of HFE (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97; p=0.015) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85; p<0.001). Subgroup and negative-control analyses yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort of patients with HFrEF and CKD, ivabradine was associated with lower risks of MACE, HFE, and all-cause mortality compared with digoxin. Ivabradine may represent a safer and more effective heart-rate-lowering option for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9584,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorenal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorenal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD), conferring a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ivabradine and digoxin are both used for heart rate control in HFrEF, but their comparative effectiveness in patients with CKD remains uncertain.
Objectives: To compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart failure exacerbation (HFE) and all-cause mortality, between ivabradine and digoxin in patients with concomitant HFrEF and CKD.
Methods: Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with HFrEF and CKD between 2015 and 2025. Patients prescribed ivabradine were propensity-score-matched 1:1 to those receiving digoxin based on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and medication variables. The primary outcome was MACE (composite of HFE or all-cause mortality). Secondary outcomes included each component separately. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: After matching, 3,140 patients were included (1,570 per group). Ivabradine use was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared with digoxin (26.8% vs 31.6%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90; p<0.001). Ivabradine also reduced the risk of HFE (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97; p=0.015) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85; p<0.001). Subgroup and negative-control analyses yielded consistent results.
Conclusions: In this large, real-world cohort of patients with HFrEF and CKD, ivabradine was associated with lower risks of MACE, HFE, and all-cause mortality compared with digoxin. Ivabradine may represent a safer and more effective heart-rate-lowering option for this high-risk population.
背景:心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)通常与慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)共存,其不良后果的风险明显增加。伊伐布雷定和地高辛均用于HFrEF患者的心率控制,但其在CKD患者中的相对有效性仍不确定。目的:比较伊伐布雷定和地高辛在合并HFrEF和CKD患者中的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险,包括心力衰竭加重(HFE)和全因死亡率。方法:使用TriNetX全球研究网络,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2015年至2025年间患有HFrEF和CKD的成年人。根据人口统计学、临床、实验室和药物变量,处方伊伐布雷定的患者与接受地高辛的患者的倾向评分匹配为1:1。主要终点是MACE(综合HFE或全因死亡率)。次要结局分别包括每个成分。Cox比例风险模型以95%置信区间(ci)估计风险比(hr)。结果:匹配后,纳入3140例患者(每组1570例)。与地高辛相比,伊瓦布雷定的使用与MACE的风险显著降低相关(26.8% vs 31.6%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90)结论:在这个大型的、现实世界的HFrEF和CKD患者队列中,与地高辛相比,伊瓦布雷定与MACE、HFE和全因死亡率的风险更低相关。伊伐布雷定对这类高危人群可能是一种更安全、更有效的降心率选择。
期刊介绍:
The journal ''Cardiorenal Medicine'' explores the mechanisms by which obesity and other metabolic abnormalities promote the pathogenesis and progression of heart and kidney disease (cardiorenal metabolic syndrome). It provides an interdisciplinary platform for the advancement of research and clinical practice, focussing on translational issues.