Comparative Effectiveness of Ivabradine Versus Digoxin in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jheng-Yan Wu, Keng-Wei Lee, Sheng-Chi Huang, Hsuan-Yuan Chang, Yu-Min Lin
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Ivabradine Versus Digoxin in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Jheng-Yan Wu, Keng-Wei Lee, Sheng-Chi Huang, Hsuan-Yuan Chang, Yu-Min Lin","doi":"10.1159/000551617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD), conferring a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ivabradine and digoxin are both used for heart rate control in HFrEF, but their comparative effectiveness in patients with CKD remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart failure exacerbation (HFE) and all-cause mortality, between ivabradine and digoxin in patients with concomitant HFrEF and CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with HFrEF and CKD between 2015 and 2025. Patients prescribed ivabradine were propensity-score-matched 1:1 to those receiving digoxin based on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and medication variables. The primary outcome was MACE (composite of HFE or all-cause mortality). Secondary outcomes included each component separately. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 3,140 patients were included (1,570 per group). Ivabradine use was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared with digoxin (26.8% vs 31.6%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90; p<0.001). Ivabradine also reduced the risk of HFE (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97; p=0.015) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85; p<0.001). Subgroup and negative-control analyses yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort of patients with HFrEF and CKD, ivabradine was associated with lower risks of MACE, HFE, and all-cause mortality compared with digoxin. Ivabradine may represent a safer and more effective heart-rate-lowering option for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9584,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorenal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorenal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD), conferring a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ivabradine and digoxin are both used for heart rate control in HFrEF, but their comparative effectiveness in patients with CKD remains uncertain.

Objectives: To compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart failure exacerbation (HFE) and all-cause mortality, between ivabradine and digoxin in patients with concomitant HFrEF and CKD.

Methods: Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with HFrEF and CKD between 2015 and 2025. Patients prescribed ivabradine were propensity-score-matched 1:1 to those receiving digoxin based on demographic, clinical, laboratory, and medication variables. The primary outcome was MACE (composite of HFE or all-cause mortality). Secondary outcomes included each component separately. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: After matching, 3,140 patients were included (1,570 per group). Ivabradine use was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared with digoxin (26.8% vs 31.6%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90; p<0.001). Ivabradine also reduced the risk of HFE (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97; p=0.015) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85; p<0.001). Subgroup and negative-control analyses yielded consistent results.

Conclusions: In this large, real-world cohort of patients with HFrEF and CKD, ivabradine was associated with lower risks of MACE, HFE, and all-cause mortality compared with digoxin. Ivabradine may represent a safer and more effective heart-rate-lowering option for this high-risk population.

伊伐布雷定与地高辛在心力衰竭伴射血分数降低和慢性肾病患者中的比较疗效:一项真实世界多中心队列研究
背景:心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)通常与慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)共存,其不良后果的风险明显增加。伊伐布雷定和地高辛均用于HFrEF患者的心率控制,但其在CKD患者中的相对有效性仍不确定。目的:比较伊伐布雷定和地高辛在合并HFrEF和CKD患者中的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险,包括心力衰竭加重(HFE)和全因死亡率。方法:使用TriNetX全球研究网络,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2015年至2025年间患有HFrEF和CKD的成年人。根据人口统计学、临床、实验室和药物变量,处方伊伐布雷定的患者与接受地高辛的患者的倾向评分匹配为1:1。主要终点是MACE(综合HFE或全因死亡率)。次要结局分别包括每个成分。Cox比例风险模型以95%置信区间(ci)估计风险比(hr)。结果:匹配后,纳入3140例患者(每组1570例)。与地高辛相比,伊瓦布雷定的使用与MACE的风险显著降低相关(26.8% vs 31.6%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90)结论:在这个大型的、现实世界的HFrEF和CKD患者队列中,与地高辛相比,伊瓦布雷定与MACE、HFE和全因死亡率的风险更低相关。伊伐布雷定对这类高危人群可能是一种更安全、更有效的降心率选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiorenal Medicine
Cardiorenal Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal ''Cardiorenal Medicine'' explores the mechanisms by which obesity and other metabolic abnormalities promote the pathogenesis and progression of heart and kidney disease (cardiorenal metabolic syndrome). It provides an interdisciplinary platform for the advancement of research and clinical practice, focussing on translational issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书