Real-World Evaluation of Allergic Reactions to Two Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Formulations in Children with Egg and/or Cow's Milk Allergy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Demet Tekcan, Ilknur Kulhas Celik, Hasibe Artac
{"title":"Real-World Evaluation of Allergic Reactions to Two Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Formulations in Children with Egg and/or Cow's Milk Allergy.","authors":"Demet Tekcan, Ilknur Kulhas Celik, Hasibe Artac","doi":"10.1159/000551656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cow's milk allergy (CMA) and egg allergy (EA) are among the most common food allergies in childhood. Although measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination is generally considered safe in food-allergic children, uncertainty persists among clinicians and families regarding the clinical relevance of residual food proteins in different MMR vaccine formulations. This study aimed to evaluate adverse reactions following administration of two different MMR vaccines in children with confirmed CMA and/or EA and to explore implications for safe immunization practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 140 children with diagnosed CMA and/or EA who received the MMR vaccine at our pediatric allergy clinic between September 2022 and May 2025. Demographic data, allergen-specific IgE levels, skin prick test results, MMR vaccine type and postvaccination reactions, were recorded. Two formulations were used: the Serum Institute of India vaccine (α-lactalbumin-containing) and Priorix® (α-lactalbumin-free).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients, EA was observed in 60%, CMA in 17.1%, and both in 22.9%. Atopic dermatitis was present in 56.4%, urticaria in 31.4%, and a history of anaphylaxis in 12.1%. Overall, 57.9% (n = 81) received the α-lactalbumin-containing vaccine, while 42.1% (n = 59) received Priorix®. Only 1 (0.7%) patient experienced anaphylaxis after vaccination with the α-lactalbumin-containing formulation. No other serious adverse reactions were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMR vaccination was generally well tolerated in children with egg and/or CMA. While rare immediate reactions may occur with vaccines containing milk-derived proteins, these findings support continued adherence to current vaccination recommendations, with awareness of vaccine composition and appropriate vaccination settings rather than vaccine avoidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cow's milk allergy (CMA) and egg allergy (EA) are among the most common food allergies in childhood. Although measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination is generally considered safe in food-allergic children, uncertainty persists among clinicians and families regarding the clinical relevance of residual food proteins in different MMR vaccine formulations. This study aimed to evaluate adverse reactions following administration of two different MMR vaccines in children with confirmed CMA and/or EA and to explore implications for safe immunization practices.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 140 children with diagnosed CMA and/or EA who received the MMR vaccine at our pediatric allergy clinic between September 2022 and May 2025. Demographic data, allergen-specific IgE levels, skin prick test results, MMR vaccine type and postvaccination reactions, were recorded. Two formulations were used: the Serum Institute of India vaccine (α-lactalbumin-containing) and Priorix® (α-lactalbumin-free).

Results: Among the patients, EA was observed in 60%, CMA in 17.1%, and both in 22.9%. Atopic dermatitis was present in 56.4%, urticaria in 31.4%, and a history of anaphylaxis in 12.1%. Overall, 57.9% (n = 81) received the α-lactalbumin-containing vaccine, while 42.1% (n = 59) received Priorix®. Only 1 (0.7%) patient experienced anaphylaxis after vaccination with the α-lactalbumin-containing formulation. No other serious adverse reactions were recorded.

Conclusion: MMR vaccination was generally well tolerated in children with egg and/or CMA. While rare immediate reactions may occur with vaccines containing milk-derived proteins, these findings support continued adherence to current vaccination recommendations, with awareness of vaccine composition and appropriate vaccination settings rather than vaccine avoidance.

对鸡蛋和/或牛奶过敏的儿童对两种MMR疫苗配方的过敏反应的实际评估。
背景:牛奶过敏(CMA)和鸡蛋过敏(EA)是儿童时期最常见的食物过敏。尽管对食物过敏的儿童接种MMR疫苗通常被认为是安全的,但临床医生和家庭对不同MMR疫苗配方中残留食物蛋白的临床相关性仍然存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估确诊CMA和/或EA儿童接种两种不同MMR疫苗后的不良反应,并探讨安全免疫实践的意义。方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年9月至2025年5月期间在我们的儿科过敏诊所接受MMR疫苗接种的140名确诊为CMA和/或EA的儿童。记录人口统计数据、过敏原特异性IgE水平、皮肤点刺试验结果、MMR疫苗类型和接种后反应。使用了两种配方:印度血清研究所的疫苗(含α-乳清蛋白)和priority®(不含α-乳清蛋白)。结果:患者中EA占60%,CMA占17.1%,两者占22.9%。特应性皮炎占56.4%,荨麻疹占31.4%,过敏史占12.1%。总体而言,57.9% (n=81)接种了含α-乳清蛋白疫苗,42.1% (n=59)接种了priority®疫苗。只有1名患者(0.7%)在接种含α-乳清蛋白制剂后出现过敏反应。无其他严重不良反应记录。结论:对鸡蛋和/或牛奶过敏的儿童普遍耐受MMR疫苗接种。虽然含有乳源性蛋白质的疫苗可能发生罕见的立即反应,但这些发现支持继续遵守目前的疫苗接种建议,了解疫苗组成和适当的疫苗接种设置,而不是避免疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书